January 10, 2007 10:00 AM PST
YouTube rivals look for answers
It increasingly looks like they were right.
Revver, a Los Angeles video-sharing company noted for being among the first to share advertising revenue with videographers, announced last month that two of the company's three co-founders and an undisclosed number of "support staff" were no longer with the company. Among those who left were Rob Maigret, Revver's chief technology officer, and David Tenzer, the head of media partnerships.
Industry insiders say Revver and other smaller video-sharing sites are in turmoil because of the sheer domination of their nascent market by YouTube. Named recently by Time magazine as "Invention of the Year," YouTube, which was acquired by Google last year, has so taken control of the video-sharing market that many rivals now are switching business models to avoid going head-to-head with the YouTube juggernaut, shaking up their executive ranks, or selling out.
"I think we can all acknowledge that YouTube has won the big prize," Thomas McInerney, the former CEO of Guba, said in an interview with CNET News.com two weeks ago.
and Revver co-founder Oliver Luckett,
who left the company last month.
Headquartered in San Bruno, Calif., YouTube's traffic grew from a few thousand to 30 million visitors in a year. The company's success is based largely on having a video player that didn't require any software downloads and by providing users with an easy way to upload clips. Another important factor was the decision by YouTube executives not to prescreen videos before they were posted--a controversial policy that allowed people to share snippets from popular TV shows, music videos and movies without the copyright holder's permission.
Said Revver co-founder Oliver Luckett in an interview Thursday: "YouTube has won round one. It has absorbed everything."
A Revver spokeswoman said Maigret and Tenzer have "transitioned to consulting positions." But Tenzer's departure was particularly startling to some observers. He was wooed away from the Creative Artists Agency, one of Hollywood's most powerful talent agencies, only seven months ago. In his nearly 25 years at CAA, Tenzer earned a reputation for packaging major entertainment deals and was brought to Revver to help the start-up form partnerships with Hollywood studios.
Tenzer declined to be interviewed. Maigret has left to collaborate with Luckett, who left Revver for a video project. Luckett said Revver, founded in 2004, is healthy and that he believes the company will succeed. He declined to give specifics on why he walked away.
"Let's just say I see a different opportunity," he said last week.
Sources close to Revver say it will now focus on improving the core businesses: video sharing and ad distribution, and is less concerned with big studio deals.
San Francisco-based Guba saw three executives leave the company last month, including CEO McInerney. Guba has recently hired banker Blake Warner of Thomas Weisel Partners to help find a buyer, according to a report in the blog
Operations at both Guba and Revver continue unimpeded by the upheaval, say sources within the companies. But the competitive landscape, which features more than 200 start-ups with few that have reported a profit, is sure to see more shakeups in the coming year, said Josh Martin, an analyst at Yankee Group Research.
"I'd be very surprised if some of these companies don't go out of business this year," Martin said. "Too many of (them) are distributing the same kind of content."
Former Revver CTO
Throughout YouTube's meteoric rise, none of its competitors has mounted a serious challenge. A check of Alexa.com, an Internet tracking system, shows that YouTube is now one of the Internet's top 10 most trafficked sites on the Web, while none of the company's top competitors has cracked the top 100.
According to Hitwise, another traffic-measuring company, YouTube was the No.1 most visited video-sharing site in December, with 45.9 percent of all visits by U.S. Web users. Revver was 27th with 0.08 percent of visits, and Guba came in 32nd with 0.05 percent.
Google paid $1.65 billion in October to acquire YouTube, and some thought that would fire interest in at least some of the video-sharing site's competitors. Yet the market hasn't seen another blockbuster deal since. McInerney offered a bleak assessment of the situation when he said the "billion-dollar opportunity" has come and gone.
1 commentJoin the conversation! Add your comment