September 8, 2006 7:40 AM PDT

Xanga fined $1 million under child privacy act, a social-networking and blog site, has been ordered to pay $1 million in a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission for violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

The FTC said in a statement Thursday that Xanga, which has been in operation since 1999, had been letting people create accounts even if the dates of birth they entered indicated that they were under the age of 13. The terms of the child privacy act, enacted in 1998, stipulate that parental notification and consent are required for a commercial Web site, including a social-networking service, to collect personal information from children under the age of 13.

In addition, the FTC alleged that Xanga's policies regarding children were not sufficiently clear on its site and that parents were not provided a means to access and control their children's information. It is estimated that over the past five years, a total of 1.7 million Xanga accounts had been registered with a birth date that implied the person was under 13. Overall, privately held Xanga has 25 million registered users.

The $1 million penalty is the largest fine ever imposed for a violation under the child privacy act, the FTC said. Mitchell Katz, an FTC spokesman, said the highest fine previously was $400,000, collected in 2004 from UMG Recordings. In that situation, personal information was similarly collected from people who registered with birth dates that indicated they were under 13, and no parental notification was given.

In response to the settlement, Xanga CEO John Hiler said in a statement that many of the 1.7 million "under 13" birth dates may have actually referred to pet birthdays, engagement dates and "born-again" dates for religious bloggers. Nevertheless, Hiler's statement also announced that Xanga is initiating new rules and standards to make the site better attuned to child safety.

See more CNET content tagged:
Xanga, online privacy, birth, children


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
...that's one really expensive [i]if[/i] loop.

Posted by Penguinisto (5042 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Just sue everyone.
Why don't they just sue myspace now. Or are you friends at News Corp. paying for your friends at the capital's ads.
Posted by nintendo812 (10 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Contempt for the law
I have nothing but contempt for this kind of law. It's just an encouragement to lie (to a computer) about our age... Gosh I claimed to be 106 to sign up here! Why don't parents assume responsibility for monitoring their children's activities?
Posted by mykid2 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.