Internet telephone provider Vonage on Thursday set out to clear up confusion about a contract it struck with network wholesaler VoIP Inc., emphasizing that the deal has nothing to do with developing a work-around to help Vonage avoid using patents held by Verizon Communications.
Schultz explained that Vonage is using the VoiceOne network, which is owned by VoIP Inc., to transport voice over Internet Protocol calls.
"VoIP Inc. is not providing technology to Vonage," Schultz said. "We're simply dumping minutes onto their network. It's no different than any other carrier partnerships that Vonage has with companies such as Level 3 or XO Communications. We've had dozens of these partnerships for years."
In March, a jury found that Vonage's IP telephony service had infringed on three patents owned by Verizon. While the jury found that Vonage did not willfully infringe on Verizon's patents, it did award Verizon $58 million in damages. On March 23, U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton said he would issue an injunction barring Vonage from using the technology included in the three patents. But he said he would not issue the injunction until friday.
Now Vonage and its 2 million-plus subscribers are waiting to see if the judge will grant a stay at the same time he issues the injunction to give Vonage more time to either appeal the case, work out a deal with Verizon, or come up with a work-around.
Vonage maintains that it is not infringing on any of Verizon's patents. The company has said repeatedly since the verdict was announced that it plans to file an appeal. And since the judge announced he would issue an injunction against Vonage, the company has filed motions with the court for a new trial and for an alteration or amendment of the judgment. In response, Verizon has also filed documents opposing each of Vonage's motions.
As for the fate of its service, Vonage is adamant that its customers have nothing to fear.
"We are focused on getting a stay from Judge Hilton or from the appellate court," Schultz said. "And we believe we will continue to provide telephone service, just as we've stated in several press releases."
Verizon attacks the one name-brand company that is competing for voip customers, to try to shut them down. All these internet technical patents are broadly written mumbo-jumbo. Vonage had licensed and bought patents that cover their operation, so they aren't trying to get something for nothing. But because they are a fierce competitor with a better price, Verizon is trying to smack them down by saying Vonage's patents aren't enough -- that Verizon's patents also cover some of the same voip stuff. Somehow they convinced a clueless jury -- and now the judge has to go by what the jury decided.
But you notice Verizon is NOT suing Packet 8 and the countless other small time voip companies who use the exact same technology? They are only suing Vonage, hoping to crush them. Then, they can sell their over-price voip to their broadband customers as a "bundle" deal.
I am not a Vonage customer, I live in Comcast territory. Comcast is selling their "digital voice" (voip) at only about a 15% discount off BellSouth's prices -- but with free long distance thrown in, of course (since it's voip). Whereas Vonage is giving a 50% to 66% discount off Bellsouth's prices, plus free long distance and many free international calls. I'm sure the discrepancy is the same in Verizon territory -- so they've decided Vonage must die.
Because in software you could sue anyone for a comperable MINOR hardware innovation like Call Fowarding etc. It is so minor that any software designer would have to pay Verizon money based on basic software operations.
I have a hard time believing Verizon's claims or at least a work around needs to happen for such basic technologies. Verzion seems likes it want to own the software industry.
Vonage needs to prove that Verizon's claims are intgral to basic software practices.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
Verizon can go stuff themselves in either case with such blatant patent trolling.
/P
But you notice Verizon is NOT suing Packet 8 and the countless other small time voip companies who use the exact same technology? They are only suing Vonage, hoping to crush them. Then, they can sell their over-price voip to their broadband customers as a "bundle" deal.
I am not a Vonage customer, I live in Comcast territory. Comcast is selling their "digital voice" (voip) at only about a 15% discount off BellSouth's prices -- but with free long distance thrown in, of course (since it's voip). Whereas Vonage is giving a 50% to 66% discount off Bellsouth's prices, plus free long distance and many free international calls. I'm sure the discrepancy is the same in Verizon territory -- so they've decided Vonage must die.
I have a hard time believing Verizon's claims or at least a work around needs to happen for such basic technologies. Verzion seems likes it want to own the software industry.
Vonage needs to prove that Verizon's claims are intgral to basic software practices.