March 14, 2005 11:00 AM PST
U.K. gets tough on music swappers
- Related Stories
-
RIAA sues 717 file-swappers
January 27, 2005 -
Music downloads get U.K. pop chart
June 29, 2004 -
File-sharing lawsuits go abroad
March 30, 2004
The British Phonographic Industry (BPI) is likely to bring further legal action against U.K. citizens accused of sharing copyright-protected files over the Internet.
Late last week the BPI won a court ruling that will force six ISPs to name 31 subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music.
Speaking on Monday, a BPI spokesman suggested that last Friday's legal success--which followed a similar court action in October--will prove to be just one part of a long-term process of changing people's behavior online through legal action.
"In terms of behavioral change, the U.K. government has broadcast the dangers of drunk driving, but people still drunk drive," said the BPI spokesman.
The ISPs involved in the case now have 14 days to provide the names sought by the BPI. The individuals named will then be invited to settle the charges, probably by paying a fine of around $3,820 (2,000 pounds).
The BPI hopes that the amount of publicity generated by last week's court success will deter Internet users from uploading copyright material to file-swapping networks.
But despite the group's tough stance, the spokesman recognized that the BPI is still facing an uphill struggle to convince file-swappers that they are in the wrong.
"We're reluctant to say, 'OK, the job's done. Let's spend money on making records,'" the BPI spokesman said. "I suspect that the problem won't go away just because we've launched two rounds of litigation."
Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK reported from London.
5 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
This would be laughable if these people were not serious. What is next - Martial Law??? Who voted in the people in who make (and enforce) our laws? It is getting to the point that govenment is not answerable to anyone!!!!
If you could buy a new CD or DVD for £5 you wouldn't bother with a pirate copy, would you?
The amount of money the industry spends on anti-piracy lawsuits, macrovision protection, etc could easily cover the price reduction per disc and the increased volume of sales would be proof.
When you see unknown musicians on MTV cribs in their big mansions, film stars getting $20 per movie and Bill Gates still the world's richest man, how can they seriously tell us that piracy is harming their businesses!
No doubt when the next CD and DVD formats come out we will be expected to bin our existing discs and re-purchase our entire collection just to line the pockets of these greedy companies.
Yes, piracy is rife in the music, film and software industry, but the pirates belong to the industry itself!
If you could buy a new CD or DVD for £5 you wouldn't bother with a pirate copy, would you?
The amount of money the industry spends on anti-piracy lawsuits, macrovision protection, etc could easily cover the price reduction per disc and the increased volume of sales would be proof.
When you see unknown musicians on MTV cribs in their big mansions, film stars getting $20 million per movie and Bill Gates still the world's richest man, how can they seriously tell us that piracy is harming their businesses!
No doubt when the next CD and DVD formats come out we will be expected to bin our existing discs and re-purchase our entire collection just to line the pockets of these greedy companies.
Yes, piracy is rife in the music, film and software industry, but the pirates belong to the industry itself!