July 19, 2005 3:12 PM PDT

Time for lawmakers to act on Grokster?

WASHINGTON--Does Congress need to lay down new laws after last month's landmark Supreme Court decision on file swapping? Depends on whom you ask.

A spectrum of outlooks came from lawyers who squared off at a panel discussion hosted Tuesday by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee.

The debate focused on the unanimous Supreme Court ruling last month that file-swapping companies that actively promote their products' copyright infringement capabilities (in legal terms, "active inducement") can be held liable for their users' illicit activities. The case now heads back to lower courts for another look.

Justice Stephen Breyer in his concurring opinion on the MGM v. Grokster case noted that "the legislative option remains available." But so far, members of Congress have applauded the court's unanimous opinion and indicated they plan to leave rule-making to the lower courts for now.

And that's the way it should be, said Don Verrilli, who argued the high court case on behalf of the entertainment industry.

"This is not the time for intervention by Congress," Verrilli said, because the Supreme Court set a "common sense standard" that gives the lower courts sufficient fodder to tackle illicit behavior. "I think (the) court has done a good job in striking the balance with the standard of inducement that it has set forth here."

Not so, countered Fred von Lohmann, a senior intellectual property attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation who represented StreamCast Networks in the suit. The Supreme Court left too many unanswered questions, von Lohmann said, adding, "I don't believe that uncertainty is balance."

"We need clear, bright-line rules so that technology companies can know in advance what they are and are not allowed to build," von Lohmann said.

He suggested two possible legislative routes: First, Congress should implement a "collective licensing" system for peer-to-peer file sharing, wherein users would pay a "reasonable fee," which would in turn be passed on to the copyright holders. Second, lawmakers should scrap the idea of statutory damages--that is, money awarded to copyright owners because of provisions in the law--but leave open the option of awarding actual damages and injunctions through the court action.

"We shouldn't have a remedial system where, if Microsoft or Apple or Slingbox bet wrong, they go out of business," von Lohmann said.

But he acknowledged that the legislative route would not be easy, as the "technology and content industries are still rather far apart" on the issues in question.

Patent lawyer Andrew Greenberg echoed those sentiments at the panel, saying, "The technology industry and the music industry have both been absolutely incapable of working together to articulate credibly, clearly and understandably what the rules of the road are."

As for legislation, Greenberg took a more moderate stance. Before deciding whether to take action, "Congress should monitor carefully" what the lower courts do, Greenberg said, adding, "I think it's time to wait and see."

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Yeah, Try to Regulate
And it simply gets developed overseas and downloaded here.

Anyone ever hear of the P2P service called Earthstation 5, its based in the Palestinian territories.

Maybe some white, rich, American lawyer will be willing to serve the lawsuit to them from over here.
Posted by bweir13 (20 comments )
Reply Link Flag
It doesn't matter where the program comes from,...
the problem it that consumers are fed up being taken advantage of by the music and movie industries and are looking for any way to get out from under their thumb.

I, for one, will not BUY any new format of music and movies, because I have spent so much money already. I already BOUGHT Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon" on vinyl, cassette, and CD. I promise to pirate the next format of that album, because I feel cheated, while the music industry profits. I am pretty sure that David gilmour and Roger Waters don't see the profits they deserve from each format change.
Posted by dam7ri (67 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.