August 26, 2005 8:28 AM PDT

Three indicted in major spam case

A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted three people accused of sending pornographic bulk e-mail in a major international spam case, the U.S. Department of Justice announced.

The case centered on allegations that the three distributed bulk e-mail advertising pornographic Web sites and containing explicit images of adults having sex. The unsolicited e-mails may have numbered in the tens of millions, the Justice Department said.

The grand jury issued indictments against former Arizona resident Jennifer R. Clason, 32; Jeffrey A. Kilbride, 39, of California; and James R. Schaffer, 39, of Arizona.

A fourth person involved in the case, Andrew Ellifson, 31, pleaded guilty last February to one count under the Can-Spam Act and one count of criminal conspiracy. His conviction marked the first related to the distribution of obscene spam e-mails, the department said.

The defendants allegedly sent the spam to earn commissions and configured the e-mails to make it difficult to ascertain the identity of the sender by falsifying the "from" line in e-mails and sending the spam from Internet Protocol addresses registered in the Netherlands while the domain names were registered in Mauritius.

Federal investigators noted that from January through June of 2004, America Online received more than 600,000 complaints regarding obscene e-mail that allegedly had been sent by the defendants. Investigators also pointed to data collected by Spamhaus, a nonprofit agency, that they say shows the defendants' operation to be among the 200 largest in the world and one that may have generated tens of millions of unsolicited bulk e-mails.

A nine-count indictment was issued to the three defendants. Each was indicted on two counts of fraud under the Can-Spam Act and one count of criminal conspiracy. Under the Can-Spam Act, it is illegal to distribute unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail.

Two of the defendants, Kilbride and Schaffer, also were indicted on two counts of interstate transportation of obscene material using a computer service, two counts of interstate transportation of obscene material and one count of money laundering.

"The Internet is both a blessing and a curse. Unwanted e-mail and pornography in our houses represents a kind of home invasion," Paul Charlton, U.S. Attorney of the Arizona District, said in a statement.

8 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
I despise spammers
Throw the book at them. Creeps. They deserve hard labor in a small cell with Bubba the Dominator.
Posted by R. U. Sirius (745 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I despise spammers
Throw the book at them. Creeps. They deserve hard labor in a small cell with Bubba the Dominator.
Posted by R. U. Sirius (745 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Waste of time.
If you want to make a dent, prosecute the businesses
that benefit from the bulk advertising. Stupid.
Posted by Johnny Mnemonic (376 comments )
Reply Link Flag
In this case they did get the perps
These spammers were promoting their own.
Posted by aabcdefghij987654321 (1722 comments )
Link Flag
Waste of time.
If you want to make a dent, prosecute the businesses
that benefit from the bulk advertising. Stupid.
Posted by Johnny Mnemonic (376 comments )
Reply Link Flag
In this case they did get the perps
These spammers were promoting their own.
Posted by aabcdefghij987654321 (1722 comments )
Link Flag
Good 1st Step But...
sadly the prevelance of spam isn't at all confined to porn site re-directors. Targetting porn was a good first step to keep kids away from stuff they shouldn't be exposed to. But the fact is that the lion's share of spam starts with advertizing servers using AI algorithms to target what they presume are a person's interests with the result that if for example you go to a sports website to check the football standings, you wind up with a ton of gambling spam in your inbox. Idiot AI programs dished out by fully legal advertising servers are the major culprit that needs attacking. And this will not be an easy challenge for government to address.
Posted by malabrm1 (36 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Good 1st Step But...
sadly the prevelance of spam isn't at all confined to porn site re-directors. Targetting porn was a good first step to keep kids away from stuff they shouldn't be exposed to. But the fact is that the lion's share of spam starts with advertizing servers using AI algorithms to target what they presume are a person's interests with the result that if for example you go to a sports website to check the football standings, you wind up with a ton of gambling spam in your inbox. Idiot AI programs dished out by fully legal advertising servers are the major culprit that needs attacking. And this will not be an easy challenge for government to address.
Posted by malabrm1 (36 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

ie8 fix

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

ie8 fix
  • Recently Viewed Products
  • My Lists
  • My Software Updates
  • Promo
  • Log In | Join CNET