March 13, 2007 4:00 AM PDT

The Web smiley's motto: Grin and bear it

Author Vladimir Nabokov said in a 1969 New York Times interview that "there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile--some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket."

Now, nearly four decades later, there is just such a typographical symbol-- :-), or :) for the minimalists, and it'd be tough to find a tech-savvy person who hasn't leaned on it. There's also a special typographical symbol for a frown-- :-( -- and one for a cool dude in sunglasses -- B-) -- and one for a wink -- ;-). There's even a typographical sign for wearing a baseball cap-- d=D.

These are emoticons (or emotive icons), the arrangements of letters and symbols that have been inserted into e-mails, message board posts, and instant messages since the fledgling days of the Internet. "Fledgling days," in this case, refers not to the mid-'90s when people were beginning to learn what AOL was, but to the early '80s, when accessing the Internet was largely limited to research universities and defense contractors.

"Originally, people were using these because it was some cool thing and it showed that you were a real expert user of the Internet, that you knew the secret language."
--Scott Fahlman, professor, Carnegie Mellon University

But the Internet is changing, and typing is no longer the only way to communicate online. With the onset of new technologies that facilitate, for example, a more graphic representation of moods, tone and inference, it's arguable that there could be frowns in the emoticon's future.

After all, the phenomenon is about to turn 25--a dinosaur in Web years. The origin of the ASCII smiley face is typically traced to September 1982, when Scott Fahlman, a research professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Department of Computer Science, suggested that the :-) symbol be used in the subject line of an online bulletin board post to denote a humorous or non-serious topic.

"Nobody ever guessed that this would catch on. I certainly didn't," said Fahlman, who is still on the faculty at Carnegie Mellon. But as he recounted, the trend spread, initially to other Internet-pioneering universities like Stanford University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and then beyond.

"As the Internet grew, it escaped this little closed community of computer scientists and made it into first other universities, a much larger group, and then out into the general public," Fahlman said. "It's been interesting to see (smiley faces) trickle from place to place, and now it's showing up in postings from Russia and China and all over the world. It's been fun to watch that."

Essentially, the emoticon proliferated along with the Internet itself.

"For people who first get into it, it's like they know the password to the secret club," Fahlman said. But now that emoticons have spread into every niche of Net culture and morphed into myriad (arguably irritating) spinoffs, that sense of exclusivity has lost some of its luster. "It's kind of pathetic when the 'in group' is sort of half the world," Fahlman observed. "But originally, people were using these because it was some cool thing and it showed that you were a real expert user of the Internet, that you knew the secret language."

Of course, the vicissitudes of human taste have it that there's almost guaranteed to be a backlash against any trend, and emoticons were no exception. "I tried to fight (using emoticons) for a long time," confessed C.C. Chapman, vice president of new marketing at the new-media marketing agency Crayon.

Emoticon gallery

"Then I just realized it was easier to showcase emotion (with emoticons)...Sometimes tone, and sarcasm especially, can be taken completely wrong in e-mail depending on who's reading it," he said.

Nevertheless, Chapman acknowledged the presence of emoticon overkill. "I'm glad the super-customization of them went away," he said, referring to the extensive lexicon of representations for hangovers, black eyes or Elvis haircuts. You don't see those used a whole lot these days, Chapman said. "It's reverted back to the simple smiles and frowns."

While simple frowns, winks and smiles have proven to have lasting power beyond their more complex counterparts, emoticons have nevertheless evolved. Most message board and instant-messaging client features now automatically convert them into cartoons or animated faces. AOL, which inaugurated its Buddy List feature in 1996 and the free AOL Instant Messenger software in 1997, has been converting ASCII emoticons to cartoon smileys since 1998, according to spokeswoman Erin Gifford.

"I kind of hate to see that," Fahlman mused. "I think it kind of destroys the whimsy of the original."

Indeed, despite the conversion features (which IM and message board users can, and often do, turn off), the sideways emoticon has become a cultural icon of sorts. In the United States, the smiley is now such a recognizable phenomenon that marketing campaigns have begun to take note. Last year, the Milk Processor Education Program (MilkPEP), famous for the "Got Milk" ads, incorporated a "branded emoticon" into its latest youth-oriented media strategy. It's a smiley face with a milk mustache, or :-{).

"We created a MySpace page that we used to launch our celebrity mustache ads," explained Victor Zaborsky, assistant director of marketing for MilkPEP. "Of course, MySpace allows you to have friends, so we e-mail our friends when a new celebrity (ad) is launching...and then we sign off with the emoticon."

Zaborsky is uncertain as to whether MilkPEP's emoticon campaign will expand its reach beyond teen-oriented online channels--currently its only medium. "It's really hard to tell," he said when asked whether it would expand into offline media or target a wider demographic. "The emoticon (campaign)'s only about a year old...It's just a way to fit into what they're already doing and be part of their world."

Funny how a 25-year-old piece of Net culture is still considered the stuff of youth marketing.

See more CNET content tagged:
emoticon, symbol, university, professor


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Slow News Day
this could have been communicated in 3 paragraphs or less
Posted by Rhyno#1 (8 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Or even better, the article could have simply not been written :)

The article is completely speculative. It's really a history of the emoticon (which would have been fine as a fluff piece), couched as a "Scary! They're going away!" shock piece.

I clicked on it because I was wondering what could possibly be said on the subject. Sadly, I got my answer: nothing of substance.
Posted by chk42 (1 comment )
Link Flag
I'm surprised that the author didn't mention that trademarked the frownie :-( a few years back.
Posted by zed (18 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Writing IS dead
Judging by most of the responses I see net-wise, writing has all but died. Rules of grammar? Fugetaboutit! Orthography? You gotta be kidding! I don't know if it's because people are in a hurry to get their thoughts on screen, or if they have no thoughts, or if nobody cares. I would be more inclined to take feedback seriously if thoughtfulness became the emotive force of the day.
Posted by CESSNA150SKYPILOT (14 comments )
Reply Link Flag
You should check your grammar....
Posted by vagarob (24 comments )
Link Flag
Writing is Dying
In this age of teaching children that effort is enough and that results are unimportant, grammar, orthography, expressivity, clarity, and more suffer. Given the informality of chatting, e-mail, and instant messaging, the use of crippled data entry tools, poor education, and the rush to participate in ever more inanity, is it a wonder that writing today is so poor?

What bothers me most is the lackadaisical attitude about it. Few today *care* to improve. The mere idea of correcting a mistake can unleash great incivility or disdain. There's no need for perfection, as your own, "You gotta be kidding," will attest, but one should set one's ideals high and strive continuously to improve.
Posted by c|net Reader (856 comments )
Link Flag
emoticon dictionary ; )
In order to impart an everlasting value to this string of comments I'm including here the emoticons from an old AOL ad before I ceremonially tear it up to heal the faded spot on my bulletin board:

:-D laughing, ':-) raised eyebrow :-|| very angry :-[ angry :<) snobby :-) happy :-/ skeptical ;-) happy with wink :'-) happy with tears :-@ scream :-| indifferent :-o surprised :-0 very surprised :-* kiss |-0 yawn 8-0 shocked :-( sad :-C very sad :-X lips sealed [:] robot %-) confused 8-) glasses.
Posted by Razzl (1318 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So THAT's the problem...
LOL (abbreviations are an annoyance for another article)! My list didn't print completely because the software took the "/" for a command. Oh well, you got the idea...
Posted by Razzl (1318 comments )
Link Flag
c-oo c--j
c--j c-oo o--7o
Posted by ifoster (11 comments )
Reply Link Flag
anyone remember the x-face protocol?
avatars for e-mail. Since the eighties.

<a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Posted by minitrue (11 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.