- Related Stories
-
Survey: Techies stressed over job insecurity
March 17, 2005 -
California retains lead in generating tech jobs
March 15, 2005 -
Oracle to PeopleSoft: The pink slip's in the mail
January 13, 2005 -
Tech industry sheds fewer jobs in 2004
January 12, 2005
The telecommunications industry accounted for the bulk of the cuts, with more than 35,000 layoffs in the first quarter, said outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which issued the report Monday. The computer industry laid off about 16,100 workers.
The firm attributed the jump in job cuts to a surge in telecommunications mergers, such as the purchase of AT&T Wireless by Cingular Wireless.
The phone industry may continue to shed jobs. SBC Communications said recently that it would cut about 13,000 positions if its purchase of AT&T withstands government review. Meanwhile Qwest Communications' proposed buyout of MCI calls for the elimination of as many as 15,000 positions. Sprint's merger with Nextel is also pending.
The industry will come under increasing pressure this year as consumers and corporations take a tech-spending breather, the report predicted.
"Consumers and companies have been buying iPods, laptops, portable DVD players, cell phones, BlackBerries, etc.," said John Challenger, chief executive of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, in a statement. "Their technology cup is overflowing, which may lead to a cooling off period until a major technology breakthrough comes along."
See more CNET content tagged:
Challenger Gray & Christmas Inc., merger, telecommunications
- Basically Leveraged Buyouts
- Buying up companies and then gutting staff is really just another form of a leveraged buyout. The acquired company is worth more dead than alive. What the purchaser is buying is some technology and a customer base, and removing a competitor. The people, buildings, copy machines, computers, etc. are just flotsam. The good people, the keepers, bailed out long ago as the crows circled and the stench of impending death began to permeate.
- Like this Reply to this comment




