- Related Stories
-
Record labels send more letters to P2P services
September 15, 2005 -
File-swap fallout in Supreme Court ruling
June 27, 2005 -
RIAA cracks down on Internet2 file swapping
April 12, 2005 -
File-swapping gets supercharged on student network
April 29, 2004
The i2Hub network emerged in early 2004, taking advantage of the supercharged network that connects college campuses to let students trade files at speeds far faster than is possible on the ordinary Internet.
But the service, which had also expanded into less controversial legal territory such as textbook exchange and dating, had increasingly been a target of record labels and movie studios cracking down on piracy. Individuals using the network have already been sued for copyright infringement, and i2Hub itself was one of a handful of networks threatened with potential legal action by the Recording Industry Association of America in September.
I2Hub founder Wayne Chang declined to comment on the network's closure, citing potential legal concerns. Visitors to the service's Web site on Monday found a nearly blank page with the terse message: "R.I.P. 11.14.2005"
The entertainment industry's legal hand was bolstered this summer by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said peer-to-peer networks could not encourage or "induce" piracy in any way without risking legal liability.
Executives at MetaMachine, the company that distributes the eDonkey file-swapping software, the most popular such peer-to-peer network in the world, have said they plan to change their business into a paid music download service.
Grokster, the file-swapping software company that gave its name to the Supreme Court, also shut down last week after a settlement with the RIAA and Hollywood studios.
See more CNET content tagged:
Internet2, file-swapping network, file-swapping, P2P, RIAA






the money spent on the movie. Theater revenues might be smaller
overall than they used to be, but they still account for goodly sized
chunk of a movies revenues.
- Who truely suffers in this?
- by dwosilverdragon November 16, 2005 9:33 AM PST
- To think because I downloaded this one song this week that Justin Timberlake(just a random superstar nothing personal justin) will not be able to put gold handles on his bently this week. Or because I downloaded Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory, Mr. Johnny Depp will have to wait a week before he can go to his private island in the Bahamas. We are seriously ruining these people's lives. They cant build there 100 foot deep pools or buy their multimillion dollar mansions if we continue to download and freely exchange music, movies and programs. I am a college student. Right now my finance are so limited that I can barely afford to do my laundry. When I manage to save some money I like to go the movies. Which do basically cost $10 now and thats with popcorn or soda. But I enjoy myself. And there are hundreds of millions of people who do the same. But if I really strapped for cash because I need to pay for o lets say college tution, rent, car, and food I would like to be able to download the movie. Things thats are downloaded off the internet are never a good a quality as seeing them live. That is a fact. I enjoy concerts, movies and non-pirated software cause they are live and are of a much better quality. But this crusade against downloading is unpatriotic and futher more it holds back technology from progessing. In the privacy of my own home, on my computer, on the internet which I have to 50 dollars a month to use, I should be in liberty to access any information avilable to me. If the RIAA keeps on killing off this service providers we will soon be left with nothing but the news to read online. There are so many more use for the internet then the news. My final point in this matter is if the musicians say they do for the love of the music, then why the law suits?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)