- Related Stories
-
FAQ: What's next in HD video fracas?
February 5, 2008 -
False starts in race to future of DVDs
October 15, 2007 -
Blu-ray vs. HD DVD: War without end
October 10, 2007 -
A DVD combo? Don't hold your breath
January 10, 2006 -
FAQ: HD DVD vs. Blu-ray
October 1, 2005 -
Intel, Microsoft endorse HD DVD
September 26, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
Wal-Mart puts stake through HD DVD's heart
February 15, 2008 -
Best Buy kicks HD DVD while it's down
February 11, 2008 -
Netflix picks Blu-ray, rattles HD DVD
February 11, 2008
Toshiba plans to give up on its format for high-definition DVDs, conceding defeat to the competing Blu-ray technology backed by Sony, a company source says.
The story "Source: Toshiba to give up on HD DVD" published February 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.






From the word go and going against Sony with their Paramount Pictures Movies and PS3 in the mix it is as good as sayonara.
And judging by the general mistrust towards M$, Toshiba has found the wrong partner to push this thing through. Xbox? Maybe they should ask Wii to support it and then the tables would have turned drastically...then again Wii would be expensive if that's the case.
No...it is not marketing. It is not knowing the battlefield well enough and finding the wrong people to fight along with.
Thank you Toshiba for making the correct decision.
- What a bunch of idiots!
- by farmerbob February 17, 2008 6:24 PM PST
- Lost to the inferior format! Blu-ray has twice the storage capacity than HD and that isn't that the point of High Def and expanded services/features. If I were to get a burner I would one that had the most capacity. So to say that HD-DVD is better is saying that Beta was too. You lose. And rightly so.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- most of us don't burn discs
- by WMJZ February 18, 2008 6:54 AM PST
- you obviously want to burn movies. and watch them well alot of us don't burn movies oh and by the way the higher capacity discs are not even available and probsbly will not be now that sony has bought their way into the studios market. you are the idiot
- Like this View reply
Processing -
- well...
- by fredmenace February 18, 2008 10:00 AM PST
- If you delved into it a little further, you'd probably see that capacity was really the only advantage Blu Ray had, and that capacity was immaterial for movies (HD DVD has more than enough capacity and bitrate too). HD DVD has many other advantages, including many significantly consumer-friendly advantages over Blu Ray. Blu Ray is also not yet ready for the consumer market, yet was pushed out prematurely (the format is still not even finalized, and players sold now and over the next six months or so will not be compatible with future discs). And HD DVD has structural, persistent price advantages for both the media and players.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(14 Comments)Now lose gracefully and go what a Beta movie. that is if you could find any, then.
I suppose it's good that one format has won, but it won't really provide any advantages soon: 1) if anything, Blu Ray is a step backward in consumer friendliness (DVD was already not the greatest, but Blu Ray is even worse), as opposed to a step forward with HD DVD, and 2) Blu Ray is still not ready for the market, and this means that everyone should wait ANOTHER six months or so before buying a player (unless they get the PS3).
So really, HD DVD losing does not speed up adoption or reduce confusion much, as wise buyers will not buy a Blu Ray player yet anyway, and for those that do, there is going to be a lot of confusion and consumer dissatisfaction with Blu Ray over the next year even without HD DVD on the scene. On the other hand, if Blu Ray had lost, then HD DVD adoption could have occurred very quickly from this point on, and I think consumers would have been very happy with it.