July 27, 2006 9:34 AM PDT

Report: U.K. failing to fight Net fraudsters

The U.K.'s Office of the Attorney General has said that victims of Internet fraud often aren't able to report the crime to the authorities, and that the police often view fraud perpetrated against companies as being victimless.

While 8 percent of all fraud in the U.K. is now carried out online, victims often do not know whom to report the crime to, according to the Fraud Review, a report issued earlier this week by the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith.

"It is often confusing for victims to know who to report the fraud to, particularly if it crosses geographical or sectoral boundaries," according to the report.

One key factor is that someone who loses money through an e-mail scam or a fake Web site may find that their local police aren't able to follow up the case because those responsible are based overseas.

"Fraudsters benefit from this lack of continuity of response. Internet fraud is a particularly good example of how a fraud can become difficult to report," the authors of the report stated.

"It is clear that fraud suffers under the current crime-reporting arrangements and that this is unhelpful, both to police efforts to develop an intelligence led response to fraud, and to victims, who are frustrated when reporting a crime," the authors continued.

Crimes that involve low-value goods and occur within a different authority may not be investigated by the police and trading standards authorities, the report concluded.

Net fraud illustrated
To illustrate this point, the report outlined an example of a successful Internet auction fraud:

A computer is advertised for 2,000 pounds on an auction site by Mr. Bogus. Mr. Green successfully bids for it, and transfers his money to the seller. The goods never arrive. Mr. Green makes a complaint to the Internet auction company, to the police, and possibly also to trading standards authorities in the area where he lives.

Because Mr. Bogus lives in a different area, with a different police force, police in the victim's area are reluctant to accept the report. Mr. Green encounters a similar situation at his local trading standards office.

Furthermore, if the goods are not worth a large sum of money, it does not appear to be a significant crime, and the police will often not investigate the case, even if they do take a report.

Mr. Bogus remains free to readvertise the computer and performs the same fraud on an increasing number of victims.

The police and trading standards do not identify Mr. Bogus as a repeat offender because the reports of fraud are either not accepted or appear in different jurisdictions.

Even if complaints from victims manage to get the goods removed from the auction company Web site, Mr. Bogus may advertise again on another site.

The "victimless" crime
The report criticized the attitudes of some police officers toward fraud perpetrated against businesses, saying that "there is often, though by no means always, a perception that fraud against business (is) somehow 'victimless.'"

The police were also criticized for being unsympathetic towards businesses fooled by tricksters.

"There is often...an attitude that victims of fraud should have done more to protect themselves," according to the report. There was also "a pragmatic realisation that fraud is not a policing priority and so is unlikely to get investigated," it said.

Many fraudsters and cybercriminals operate abroad, which makes it very difficult for the police to pursue them, according to security experts, who agree that jurisdiction issues and lack of resources are major problems for law enforcement.

"There's a danger with tech crime that the authorities don't think it's worth pursuing," said Graham Cluley, senior technology for Sophos. "There's not a great willingness to investigate these things. Criminals using the Internet have already done their getaway--they're in Brazil."

"You can bounce the crime around the world, and it's harder to follow the paper trail," said Cluley.

Legal experts agreed there is an enforcement problem with Internet fraud.

"The Internet has provided new opportunities for fraud to be committed and it is now a significant problem for both businesses and individuals," said David Woods, an associate and litigation expert with Pinsent Masons solicitors.

"The current system has made it difficult to coordinate efforts among the various law enforcement agencies to effectively tackle fraud," Woods told Out-Law.com.

Lord Goldsmith's report claimed that many of the proceeds of fraud go to organized criminals, and that the harm caused is second only to trafficking in hard drugs. To overcome the problem of reporting these crimes, the Fraud Review proposed establishing a National Fraud Reporting Centre for businesses and individuals.

This center would receive reports, analyze them, identify patterns and trends, and provide police and other investigative agencies with information to target investigations.

U.K. consumer confidence has been battered by online fraud. The 2002-03 British Crime Survey results showed that 75 percent of respondents were worried about the security of using a credit card online.

The U.K. telecommunications industry has also been severely affected by fraud, with 866 million pounds, or 2.4 percent, of annual retail revenue being lost to fraudsters in 2004.

Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.

See more CNET content tagged:
fraud, police, fraudster, victim, crime


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Victimless my @$%!!
Fraud of this manner is such an issue lately that the authorities need to do what they can, regardless of where it takes place. If you are a citizen in the UK then you could at least hope that your own police/investigators could help even if the scam takes place overseas.

"There is often... an attitude that victims of fraud should have done more to protect themselves," said the report. There was also "a pragmatic realisation that fraud is not a policing priority and so is unlikely to get investigated,"

Yes, it is true that victims need to protect themselves better but for the authorities to think that is rediculous. If people are going to geet this kind of reaction from their own police, then they need to take action themselves and start protecting their assets on their own.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.essentialsecurity.com/Documents/article16.htm" target="_newWindow">http://www.essentialsecurity.com/Documents/article16.htm</a>
Posted by Nkully86 (59 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Scams out of jack ass England
The attoreney GeneralShould never be called a Sir but in stead Mr. JACKASS.
And YO YO Scocttland Yard is The Joke Of the Planet.
Posted by wsayre7 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
i am shahed i am also the victim of internet fraud done by uk people,the money i send was my father savings can u please arrange the money from uk government
Posted by shaheds (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.