ie8 fix
News.com special report:

50 years in space

Tell us what you think about this storyTalkBack    E-mail this story to a friendE-mail    Add to your del.icio.usdel.icio.us    Digg this storyDigg this

Private industry moves to take over space race

By Stefanie Olsen
Staff writer, CNET News.com
October 1, 2007, 4:00 a.m. PDT

Editors' note: This is part of a series examining 50 years of space exploration.

The wealthy men behind today's commercial space industry were just kids when the U.S.-Soviet space race started 50 years ago.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen was 4 years old when the Russians launched Sputnik I into geocentric orbit on October 4, 1957, an act that effectively ignited the competition for dominance in suborbit.

Aerospace engineer Burt Rutan was 14 when the United States created the National Aeronautics and Space Administration the following year. Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Megastores, was 10 when Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first man to orbit the Earth on April 12, 1961, followed by U.S. astronaut Alan Shepard in a suborbital flight less than a month later.

Space Adventures founder Peter Diamandis was just 5 days old when President John F. Kennedy announced that the United States would put a man on the moon within the decade.

The common denominator between these men? They are the pioneers of a new private space race, 35 years after anyone has walked on the moon. The U.S.-Soviet space race surely brought about technologies we now take for granted, ranging from satellite-based navigation to Tang. It also left an indelible mark on a generation that will shape the next 50 years of space exploration. Like the pioneers of the aviation industry, kids who idolized the Wright brothers, the men trying to get private industry into space grew up with names like Shepard and Armstrong as their heroes.

"Right now kids are inspired by the next iPhone, not by exploration or taking risks, and that's going to hurt us."
--Burt Rutan, founder, Scaled Composites

"Why are (we) doing something in space? Because that's what inspired them, that's what inspired me as a youth," said Diamandis, who has founded more than four companies in the space tourism and entertainment businesses, including Space Adventures, which takes private citizens to the International Space Station for between $25 million and $35 million.

The list of millionaires and billionaires inspired by NASA's glory years continues: Neil Armstrong finally walked on the moon for the first time in human history on July 21, 1969, when Amazon.com founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos was 5. Doom video game creator John Carmack was little more than 6 months old when astronaut Shepard played golf on the lunar turf in 1971. And PayPal founder Elon Musk was nearly 18 months old when NASA took its last manned lunar mission in 1972.

Allen, Rutan, Musk, Bezos and Carmack are paving the way for private industry in space from the deep pockets of their own industrial efforts. Made wealthy by taking chances in fields like software, computers, aviation and the Internet, they're taking the risk in space that was once the sole domain of governments. If you ask any of them what drove them into this field, they will most likely tell you it was a boyhood desire to be an astronaut. That, and frustration with government efforts in space today.

Diamandis added: "In the last 40 years, we've never fulfilled the promise that we had seen in Apollo. So, now people are saying, 'I'm going to give up on the government, I'm going to do it myself.'"

At the 50th anniversary of space exploration, many industry pundits and executives say there's a new era upon us. They describe the 17 years after Sputnik as the first phase of a journey marked by new human and robotic exploration in space, and which culminated in the Skylab and the Apollo missions. The second phase, from 1976 to 2007, was characterized by robotic missions to other planets like Saturn, collecting data about the universe.

"As it turns 50, there's a third era about to begin, one that recaptures the excitement of pioneering human voices that was characterized by the early years," said David Thompson, CEO of Orbital Sciences, which developed the first private launch vehicle, Pegasus.

Activities in the private industry come at a time when governments are stepping up their efforts in space, too. President George Bush has set NASA on a mission to put men back on the moon by 2020, and then onto Mars between 2035 and 2037. Among other international efforts, Russian plans to build a new manned space transport system by 2015 and China plans to send another rover to the moon in 2012, to survey every inch of lunar surface.

"The next 50 years are going to be historic. There's intensifying economic and space competition," said Joanne Maguire, head of space systems for Lockheed Martin.

Entrepreneurs like Rutan and Diamandis believe (with no shortage of controversy) NASA should leave manned flights to suborbit and the moon to private companies like their own. Players in private space development believe they can lay the groundwork to bring down the cost of suborbital space tourism so that it might one day be as common and affordable as taking a flight on Southwest. Eventually, entrepreneurs believe they can colonize other planets so people will have a place to visit and stay. Executives also see space as an eventual trillion-dollar market for mining its vast resources in energy, minerals and real estate.

Next page: Where does the government fit in?



6 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
"For the first time in our 4-billion-year history,...
... we have the opportunity to extend life beyond Earth, but the economic challenges are substantial," Musk said. "The reason I founded SpaceX was to try in a little way to make that happen.". Just got to have that IBM "SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA" playing those E-C-O-N-O-M-I-C__T-U-N-E-S (ERR) AT WARP SPEED!

TO BOLDLY GO!

LIVE LONG AND PROSPER!

COMMANDER_SPOCK
Posted by Commander_Spock (3123 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Tourist flights are nice...
...but it's hardly making real use of space. Not until we really start taking advantage by doing R&D and manufacturing of real products will we be getting anywhere.

If America plays it's cards right, it could take advantage of our experience in space, and our financial resources, to get the first factories and R&D facilities into orbit, to find the best ways to utilize microgravity, near-perfect vacuum and near-zero temperatures (3 things difficult or impossible to create on the ground) to create new and superior products, and regain some of our technological and manufacturing edge.
Posted by Steve Jordan (126 comments )
Reply Link Flag
What about The "CONCORDE"!
"If America plays it's cards right, it could take advantage of our experience in space, and our financial resources...." Given all that is now known about "The CONCORDE" - Why not create "R&D facilities" to come up with the "SILENT" CONCORDE that is certain to create "economic" waves around the world with all those new billionaires around the world. With less time in the air... America and those affluent space tourists and operators might just see a less crowded sky.
Posted by Commander_Spock (3123 comments )
Link Flag
Agreed.
You did miss one big, fat moneymaker, though - energy.

If we can get up solar farms in orbit, then the paybacks are relatively fast. The downside is the amount of material required to get one together, though a lot of it could be collected and built elsewhere (like, say, the Moon) where we don't have a big fat gravity well to worry so much about.

/P
Posted by Penguinisto (5042 comments )
Link Flag
WE DON'T NEED NASA WE NEED A BRAND NEW UNIVERSE
ACCORDING TO NOSTRADAMUS { WHEN THE END OF THE WORLD IS NEAR DROUGHT'S AND NATURAL DISASTER'S WILL OCCUR}.SO IF SUMMER WAS HOT,HOT,HOT,WILL WINTER BE COLD,COLD,COLD,WELL STAY TUNED TO YOUR LOCAL WEATHER CHANNEL'S FOR YOUR WEATHER.ASK NASA FOR HEATING BILL'S,YOU MIGHT NEED IT,AJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA.SAYONARA.ADIO'S AMIGO'S.FROM HERE TO ETERNITY.KEEP WARM,OR COOL.UNTILL MY D-DAY.BOOM.
Posted by U.S.NAVY (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
To Colonization will need to propulsion
Todays technology and 99.999% of the proposed technologies are science fiction or dont provide a real solution.

Here is one just published that does.

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://nlspropulsion.net" target="_newWindow">http://nlspropulsion.net</a>

Space mining and colonization is man's destiny !
Posted by grey_eminence (153 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.