August 15, 2005 3:41 PM PDT
Private domains not so private?
- Related Stories
-
Unnoticed fee could raise Net domain costs
December 16, 2004 -
Register.com says rival duped customers
September 18, 2002
Alan Cordle, a Portland, Ore., librarian, had been posting information on his Web site, Foetry, that he said illustrated a pattern of patronage and other ethical problems in high-level poetry competitions.
But because his wife was a poet, he decided to register Foetry anonymously through GoDaddy's Domains By Proxy (DBP) division, which markets a service allowing domain owners' contact information to remain private.
But some in the poetry community were infuriated by Cordle's assertions, he said, and demanded that DBP reveal his identity.
And while the circumstances of what happened are in dispute, the company decided to cancel Cordle's DBP account and make his information public.
Now, Cordle is trying to raise awareness about what he says is the service's duplicity. And in the process, he is putting a spotlight on the realities of trying to remain anonymous on the Internet today.
"I was probably naive," Cordle said. "I thought that they would completely protect my privacy. That's the whole purpose of DBP. They don't do anything else but purport to protect domain privacy."
Services like DBP are an adjunct to typical domain registration. Normally, when someone registers a Web site name, their personal information--including name, address, phone number and e-mail--are available to anyone through WhoIs databases. But services like DBP offer to keep private information secret by registering domains on behalf of their clients, and charge a premium for the privilege.
But the company said that despite its marketing efforts, DBP is under no legal obligation to maintain its customers' privacy.
"I can tell you DBP was within its rights to cancel Mr. Cordle's privacy services pursuant to the terms of its proxy agreement," said Nima Kelly, GoDaddy's vice president of public relations.
"You understand and agree that DBP has the absolute right and power, in its sole discretion and without any liability to you whatsoever," the agreement states, to "close accounts (or) reveal your name and personal information."
In general, the agreement states, DBP would only take such action when it is subpoenaed or legally required to do so, but the language doesn't preclude any circumstances in which it could decide to reveal a customer's information.
Cordle claims GoDaddy's biggest infraction was revealing his personal information, which subsequently spread across a number of poetry-related Web sites, without contacting him first.
"The main thing I'm angry about is that they were supposed to contact me," he said. But "I received no e-mail nor a phone call."
Meanwhile, Cordle isn't the only DBP customer unhappy with its performance.
David Payer, a Web site owner from Iowa, said he discovered that DBP had given his personal information out over the phone after getting a phone request for it.
"They missed the boat on this one," Payer said. "They simply did it wrong. They should have called me at least. But I got neither a telephone call nor an e-mail, and they simply gave away the information."
To some, DBP's actions, regardless of the reasoning behind them, are unfortunate, especially in light of comments made on GoDaddy President Bob Parson's blog about the virtues of the DBP service.
"The benefits of private domain registration are not trivial," Parson wrote, before listing a number of rights people lose, including protection from having their home address made public, if their personal information is made public against their will.
"The tradition of anonymous speech is a long one in this country," said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "and, in fact, is a constitutionally protected right. And people should have an avenue to speak anonymously online."
Bankston said that there are numerous venues online for anonymous speech, from Blogspot blogs to Geocities Web sites. But he cautioned against counting on the goodwill of companies like DBP.
"Trusting a third party to keep your identity secret for you," he said, "is a dangerous game."
19 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
You could agree to the fact that every person that owns a domain is not a spammer, correct?
There is all kinds of people that put up websites now.. to small business owners, and just random people that want to have their own little spot on the internet. I'm sure somewhere there's an old lady that loves cats that has bought a website to talk about it. Her information is public for anything one to view. With the trolls and everyone else on the internet she deserves to have her privacy. I'm sure there's trolls out there that would send her death threats, or prank her.. just because they find it funny. Is that something she really deserves?
I use to own a picture rating website and had people threaten to kill me over the most ridiculous things.. We did have a business address listed on the whois but it wasn't where either of the 'owners' of the site lived. I had one person send a letter saying he was going to kill me because he got downrated on the site and some other user had a higher rating then them. This person could have just been a troll.. but honestly with the people of today it really wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't.. and had a mental problem. Regardless of if he was a troll or not.. I still shouldn't have to deal with that offline and outside of my business.. and i'm glad my address wasn't made public.
the only thing I found after days of googling that seems REALLY anonymous is Katz Global Media (from a message buried in a "white pride" forum of all places!) I haven't taken the plunge yet, but it seems genuinely anonymous coz they never have your info in the first place: you pay only by anonymous e-currency. They can't give out info they don't have.
Of all the sites advertising "anonymous" domain registration, check out their details/terms & conditions: you'll find it's either a rebadge of GoDaddy (i.e. NOT anonymous) or Katz (really anonymous). Oh, and I think there's a third one based in Lichtenstein (!).
EPIC, EFF and all that crowd had lots of info on anonymous *posting* & *e-mailing* but zilch on anonymous domain registration & hosting. I really hope someone develops a resource on this. Or that there is one already that my google fu didn't find and some nice person will post it here.
I never received a reply.
I decided not to go with them.
See the following link and judge for yourself:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.californialegalteam.com/journal/?m=200510" target="_newWindow">http://www.californialegalteam.com/journal/?m=200510</a>
"What makes our domain system private and anonymous? In our specially arranged system, your public WHOIS information and your private ownership details are held completely separate. People who try to dig up your information using WHOIS or similar lookup tools will _only_ get shown the information YOU want them to see, which you can set and change yourself at any time. Who owns the domain name? You do. Unlike other so-called "private" or anonymous domain registration systems (where some other company "holds" your domain), with our system you maintain full private ownership of your domain name at all times. You can login after the domain is registered and privately see your ownership details. You can also update and modify any and all WHOIS details to be whatever you want. This also means you can transfer your domain to a different company if you want to at any time. We do not control your domain, you do."
Just the Attorney asking them to take down the domain names, caused that too. I was ripped off and they wouldn't give me my money back. There is no security with this company. They will give you up in a heart beat, their server is in Vancouver Washington and a bunch of weenies run it that will force any company they server with to give you and your privacy up.
Let's say there's abuses taking place at this specific job or whatever it is.
You decide to take action by building a website, and outing those that are in the wrong.
Those that are in the wrong have ALOT of power to throw around (Let's say they've got the police , and others who are in authority in their pockets).
Due to these DNS security lapses, they could find out who you are, then do away with you (Yes, Plenty of people are killed over money).
In the event with a anonymous host, they can't find you.
Sure , they're definately open for abuses, but just think of what a world would be like where you had NO options to speak out. The one great hope (The internet) to speak out against your boss, coworkers ,ect is then not yours anymore , but theirs.
How? Pretty simple. Safeguard your Whois info with our $10 LIFETIME Privacy Domain Service! Who can beat that?
Make your Domain Private for $10 lifetime NO recurring fees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEigZLAzg4k
http://makedomainprivate.com/
They're pretty quick to respond and generally very helpful. Plus their offshore status helps in squashing up lawyers notices from the United States.
Cheers!
For Example...I register a domain mydomain.in. I post my original material. After sometime, someone else registers a private domain with the same domain name except the extension, i.e mydomain.com, and makes the info. Private. He tries to abuse my Work aor My Reputation.
In these circumstances, what can be my role to avoid such circumstance.
Mostly, such a thing happen with "Disgruntled Employees".
If anyone has a solution, kindly contact me on http://facebook.com/debojyotiphaxor or my E-mail : haxors.democracy@gmail.com.