November 30, 2007 5:00 AM PST

Police Blotter: MySpace profile sets convicted felon free

Related Stories

Police Blotter: Dot-com swindler goes to prison

November 21, 2007

Police Blotter: Can a cell phone camera intimidate a witness?

November 16, 2007

Police Blotter: Did blogging juror affect DUI trial?

November 9, 2007

Police Blotter: Is computer-generated pornography illegal?

November 2, 2007

Police Blotter: Craigslist toddler giveaway ad sparks suit

October 26, 2007

Police Blotter: Official can't be fired in sex e-mail flap

October 17, 2007

Police Blotter: Is it legal to use an alias anymore?

October 12, 2007

Police Blotter: Fired worker blames porn on malware

October 3, 2007

Police Blotter: Justice Dept.'s warrantless eavesdropping rejected

September 26, 2007

Police Blotter: Porn spammers' guilty verdict upheld

September 7, 2007

Police Blotter: MySpace profile becomes part of rape conviction

August 16, 2007

Police Blotter: Defendant wins breathalyzer source code

August 9, 2007

Police Blotter: Fake gay HotorNot profile draws suit

July 13, 2007

Police Blotter: Dark side of 'reputation defending' service

June 29, 2007

Police Blotter: Necrobabes.com leads to murder conviction

June 21, 2007

Police Blotter: Teenage murderers convicted through IM logs

June 13, 2007

Police Blotter: Court overturns man's Net ban for life

June 6, 2007

Police Blotter: Cops need warrant to search cell phone?

May 30, 2007

Police Blotter: Bondage Webmaster fights abuse conviction

May 23, 2007

Police Blotter: Imprisoned sex offenders demand PCs

May 16, 2007

Police blotter: Fired federal worker sues over googling

May 9, 2007

Police blotter: Can someone else let cops search your PC?

May 2, 2007

Police blotter: Secret recording inadmissible against bus driver

April 25, 2007

Police blotter: Cops OK to copy cell phone content

April 19, 2007

Police blotter: Open Wi-Fi blamed in child porn case

April 18, 2007

Police blotter: Sensual masseuse sues ex-customer

April 11, 2007

Police blotter: No privacy in home PC brought to work

April 5, 2007

Police blotter: Ex-employee sued for deleting files

March 28, 2007

Police blotter: Unbrotherly love in Craigslist sex ad

March 21, 2007

Police blotter: Computer logs as alibi in wife's death

March 14, 2007

Police blotter: FBI's 'misleading' wiretap suppressed

March 7, 2007

Police blotter: Wife e-surveilled in divorce case

March 1, 2007

Police blotter: Convicted eBay robber loses appeal

February 21, 2007

Police blotter: Wireless voyeur appeals 56-year term

February 14, 2007

Police blotter: Texas student guilty in SSN hack

February 2, 2007

Police blotter: Heirs sue over will-making software

January 24, 2007

Police blotter: Antispam activist fights lawsuit

January 19, 2007

Police blotter: Detecting computer-generated porn?

January 3, 2007

Police blotter: Web at heart of ecoterror lawsuit

December 27, 2006

Police blotter: Google searches nab wireless hacker

December 20, 2006

Police blotter: Fired over 'Wicked Weasel' photo

December 8, 2006
Police Blotter is a weekly News.com report on the intersection of technology and the law.

What: West Virginia man, who was convicted of sex abuse of two minors, appeals the verdict, saying jurors in his case should not have been hunting for an alleged victim's MySpace.com profile.

When: Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia rules on November 21.

Outcome: Defendant's conviction is reversed, and a new trial is granted.

What happened, according to court documents:
Danny Cecil was convicted last year of abusing two teenage girls and sentenced to up to 40 years in prison. Now he's free.

The story starts in mid-2005, when a 13-year-old girl referred to as KJ, a friend of Cecil's daughter, spent the night. KJ said Cecil woke her up while she was sleeping by fondling her and then left the room when she rolled over. KJ's mother alerted the police.

Another girl, referred to as SD, subsequently came forward and reported a similar experience.

A jury returned a verdict of guilty on three of the four counts of felony sexual abuse. Cecil was sentenced to 10 to 20 years on one count, with a consecutive term of 10 to 20 years on another.

What makes this case relevant to Police Blotter is that at least two jurors had been perusing MySpace.com. (Compare this with a Police Blotter installment from earlier this month about a juror who blogged during the trial.)

During the trial, the two jurors ended up looking for the home page of KJ, one of the alleged victims, whose mother had testified that she was withdrawn and not interested in older males.

The fact that KJ had a MySpace profile had come up during testimony. KJ had posted a comment on her page saying "remember my face because I'm going to be famous someday" and, according to the defense, used the account to communicate with older boys.

It's a little unclear exactly what these two jurors saw, especially since KJ's Web site was apparently restricted or removed before the trial began. In addition, the court indicated that the two jurors-turned-investigators weren't able to find anything relevant.

What the appeals court also found troubling is that a third unnamed juror, an employee of the state Department of Health and Human Resources, claimed that the jury should lend more credence to the girls' testimony than the defendant's.

Saying it had "no choice" but to throw out Cecil's conviction, the appeals court granted him a new trial that will likely take place in the spring. Until then, he's free on bond and living just a few houses away from one of the girls he's accused of molesting.

Excerpts from the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia's opinion:
We do not take lightly our responsibility in reviewing a verdict that is returned by a jury, one of whose members may have either prematurely reached a decision based on information not presented during the trial, or introduced into the jury room extrinsic information upon which other jurors may have based their decision. Any challenge to the lack of the impartiality of a jury assaults the very heart of due process.

This court has held that, "Where the record of a criminal trial shows that the cumulative effect of numerous errors committed during the trial prevented the defendant from receiving a fair trial, his conviction should be set aside, even though any one of such errors standing alone would be harmless error." Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the cumulative effect of each of the instances of juror misconduct discussed above made it impossible for the appellant to receive a fair trial.

We are mindful that the independent investigation conducted by two of the jurors did not bear fruit, which arguably lessens the prejudicial effect, but notwithstanding that fact, the mere fact that members of a jury in a serious felony case conducted any extrajudicial investigation on their own is gross juror misconduct which simply cannot be permitted. Without meaningful censure, failure to properly punish such behavior would encourage or allow its repetition. Given the independent investigation by these jurors and the fact that another juror advised that the alleged victims' testimony should be given more weight than that of the appellant contrary to the judge's instructions and our law, we have no choice but to vacate the appellant's convictions.

See more CNET content tagged:
juror, Police Blotter, West Virginia, jury, girl

10 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Problem
With the prolific amounts of information available in our connected society it is going to be more and more difficult to restrict the information jurors bring into their deliberations. It will be difficult to get people to serve if total sequestration is imposed, more people might risk contempt charges and simply refuse to report when summoned. Then there is the issue of what prospective jurors have read, seen and heard prior to the trial. What to do?
Posted by nmoore6676 (7 comments )
Reply Link Flag
what to do?
Have appointed jurors from every zip in the United States sequestered for 30 days to hear as many cases as they can. Pay them, train them and let them decide cases based on evidence presented during trial only. Have them deliberate without any communication outside of that room.
Posted by tres1973 (2 comments )
Link Flag
Naw, the problem
is the lack of an IQ test for jurors. The fact that these Jurors thought that they would find anything credible or pertinent in a MySpace site posted by a 13 y/o should be criminal. Now, because of their idiocy, we potential have a child molester walking free. The problem is that while they were busy doing their "Matlock/Serlock" impersinations, they couldn't descern that they were doing the wrong thing all the while sitting in judgement of another person.
Posted by suyts (824 comments )
Link Flag
Problem
With the prolific amounts of information available in our connected society it is going to be more and more difficult to restrict the information jurors bring into their deliberations. It will be difficult to get people to serve if total sequestration is imposed, more people might risk contempt charges and simply refuse to report when summoned. Then there is the issue of what prospective jurors have read, seen and heard prior to the trial. What to do?
Posted by nmoore6676 (7 comments )
Reply Link Flag
what to do?
Have appointed jurors from every zip in the United States sequestered for 30 days to hear as many cases as they can. Pay them, train them and let them decide cases based on evidence presented during trial only. Have them deliberate without any communication outside of that room.
Posted by tres1973 (2 comments )
Link Flag
Naw, the problem
is the lack of an IQ test for jurors. The fact that these Jurors thought that they would find anything credible or pertinent in a MySpace site posted by a 13 y/o should be criminal. Now, because of their idiocy, we potential have a child molester walking free. The problem is that while they were busy doing their "Matlock/Serlock" impersinations, they couldn't descern that they were doing the wrong thing all the while sitting in judgement of another person.
Posted by suyts (824 comments )
Link Flag
Wrong headline
The headline should read "Idiot Juror who can't follow judge's instructions allows convicted felon to go free". That Juror should be incarcerated on contemp of court charges until the new trail starts.
Posted by zclayton2 (130 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Wrong headline
The headline should read "Idiot Juror who can't follow judge's instructions allows convicted felon to go free". That Juror should be incarcerated on contemp of court charges until the new trail starts.
Posted by zclayton2 (130 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.