PC World editor resigns over apparent ad pressure

Award-winning Editor-in-Chief Harry McCracken of PC World resigned Tuesday over disagreements with the magazine's publisher regarding stories critical of advertisers, according to sources.

McCracken, reached Wednesday evening, confirmed that he resigned after 12 years at the magazine and 16 years at publisher International Data Group, over disagreements with management. He declined to comment on the nature of those disagreements.

But three sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told CNET News.com that McCracken informed staffers in an afternoon meeting Wednesday that he decided to resign because Colin Crawford, senior vice president, online, at IDG Communications, was pressuring him to avoid stories that were critical of major advertisers.

Wired News reported Wednesday evening that McCracken quit after Crawford killed a draft story titled "Ten Things We Hate About Apple."

An IDG representative confirmed McCracken resigned, but said he was unable to comment on personnel matters. In an e-mail to News.com, Crawford denied that advertiser pressure played any part in McCracken's resignation.

PC World is best known for its product reviews and how-to expertise. The magazine has won numerous awards over the years for its coverage of the PC industry and technology in general, including six prizes--such as Best Computer/Consumer Magazine--just awarded last week at the Maggie awards, run by the Western Publications Association.

"I spent 12 years at PC World; it's been incredibly good to me," McCracken said. He said he will still have some sort of writing relationship with the organization.

A source at PC World who wished to remain anonymous praised McCracken's decision.

"It saddens us all that Harry, a PC World institution, decided to leave," the source said. "But dammit, we're proud of him for doing it."

PC World is published by IDG, a venerable trade publishing organization that has been covering the technology industry since 1964. The monthly magazine reaches 4.3 million "purchase influencers," and PCWorld.com has 6.8 million unique visitors per month, according to a Wednesday press release touting the Maggies winners.

IDG also publishes well-known trade magazines and Web sites about the computer industry such as Computerworld, Network World, and InfoWorld, which recently shuttered its print publication and focused solely on its Web site. IDG was founded by Patrick McGovern and is privately held.

Crawford has been with IDG since 1994, according to his blog, when he became CEO of Macworld. He ran Macworld until 2003, when he became vice president of business development within IDG's corporate management structure, before assuming his current role.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Advertising

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Service level management

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Workplace

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
disagreement, magazine, advertiser, Macworld

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 63 comments (Page 1 of 4)
Not surprising
by ewelch May 2, 2007 7:38 PM PDT
Didn't that 10 things article make it eventually? Or was it done by someone else? There is no doubt that marketing people try to pressure editors to be easy on advertisers who provide significant income. Especially now as magazines feel pressure from websites. If all editors reported all attempts to pressure them, it would stop. Advertisers are afraid of being exposed for pressuring news organizations to slant news. Cockroaches always scatter when the light is turned on. In Atlanta some big car dealership pulled all of their ads from the Atlanta Journal back in the 80s because they did an article on dishonest car delears. A newspaper I worked for killed an article in a special section once. The article was on how to buy a used car. It happens all the time. And any editor worth his/her salt will resist. Publishers need to keep their fingers out of the editorial content if they can't keep the separation between editorial and advertising. Because they kill the goose that lays the golden egg the minute readers realize that the stories are not independent of such advertisers pressure. I'm going to cancel all of my email subscriptions to IDG publications. And I'm going to tell them why.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
It is actually Computerworld
by davebarnes May 2, 2007 7:59 PM PDT
and not ComputerWorld. I know it doesn't make sense, but there you are.
Reply to this comment
Shocking, Just Shocking
by Stating May 2, 2007 8:34 PM PDT
It is absolutely shocking to hear that publishers influence reporters' stories to make a quick buck. But you know, I don't buy a product until I first read what other consumers have to say about it. And if I don't like a product, I make sure to ell others about my bad experience. I frequently find that technology publications just do not do enough in-depth testing to discover what shortcuts the vendors took that come back to bite the consumer. More and more these days, products are under-engineered.
Reply to this comment
Re: Not suprising
by the1kingarthur May 2, 2007 9:58 PM PDT
You are setting a great example in which I will follow, and recomend everyone else to do too. Corruption will not stop until someone some where says enough is enough. It only takes one person to get things going. Thank you for your post
Reply to this comment
Cnet editors.
by ServedUp May 2, 2007 10:05 PM PDT
Well he has integrity. I like seeing that in a tech writer. But what's he going to do next? Print is slipping to second place. But in contrast to this story... Would that mean that most CNET Editors are "yes-Men"? They always write favourable reviews for their advertisers. I suppose its a Catch-22. You need the dollars to run the business. In the end, I guess the only one who loses are the readers.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
We Support First Because It Gives Value
by wilswong May 2, 2007 11:11 PM PDT
Although I am not a subscriber to PC World, I do enjoy the read whenever I can get my hands on it, usually at the airports. Anyway, it does a great job and its reviews are really top notch. A publication can only be successful only if the readers find value in the things he/she reads. However, once the product in question is bad and the story is edited to be more 'acceptable' to the advertisers then the readers will be at the losing end. On the other hand, some writers may have uncalled prejudices against a particular brand or product and may reflect in their writing. We need a better review method. One that is in used now is the users' review which is good. But would it be better if reviewers from other departments write their thoughts too? So at least there are two views to have an average gauge. My 2 cents worth. Wilson
Reply to this comment
A line has been crossed
by adlyb1 May 3, 2007 2:24 AM PDT
A large portion of computer related sites on the web are nothing more than well disguised ads, so it is critical that the mainstream groups (like IDG, Cnet, ZDnet, etc.) maintain their editorial integrity. If this story is true then I will indeed avoid IDG publications going forward.
Reply to this comment
Good behavior
by billmosby May 3, 2007 3:45 AM PDT
Its good to see such an example of integrity. If George Tenet or somebody else with his stature in the Administration had behaved similarly earlier, certain current events might well have had a better outcome.
Reply to this comment
Good! I hope he takes his entire staff with him.
by ibeetle May 3, 2007 3:58 AM PDT
In the last year or two MacWorld and PC World have become sensationalist headline grabbing hypocrites. After being a subscriber for over 6 years I have let my subscription lapse, and with good cause. With tabloid headlines like ...iPod killer..., iPhone killer..., and 10 reasons you should hate..., many IDG publications have become a techno-geek National Enquirer. There needs to be an entire house cleaning of all IDG publications staff.
Reply to this comment
Your Reputation is All You've Got
by skippy.buckwalter May 3, 2007 4:46 AM PDT
I'm surprised PC World's powers-that-be don't realize your reputation is all you've got. Kudos to McCracken for taking this principled stand. In an effort to chase ad dollars Crawford does not serve its readers by sucking up to advertisers. This is what happens when you put an advertiser's advocate in charge of editorial and tell the journalist to check their ethics at the door.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
EA debuts new family, sports titles
Apple cuts price of flash-drive MacBook Air
LCD making worse for environment than coal?
Report: Yahoo sites get traffic boost from Google
Google Talk comes to the iPhone, iPod Touch
Most Popular Stories
Jobs, Apple directors face new backdating suit
'Netflix box' to carry more than just Netflix
IE 8 to have antimalware protection
Facebook-advertised boozefest spurs liquor ban
China's military tries out Segways
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.65%) 73.03 11,288.54
S&P 500 (0.11%) 1.38 1,262.90
NASDAQ (-0.27%) -6.08 2,245.38
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,580.18
  Symbol Lookup
Detroit auto show
Detroit auto show

Detroit auto show
advertisement
On CBS Sports: Enter a fantasy football mock draft now
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites