December 6, 2005 10:56 AM PST

Ozone hole living longer than expected

Your old fridge is helping the holes in the ozone layer stay alive.

Damage to the upper atmosphere caused by the emission of fluorocarbons won't likely return to the level it was at in 1980 until 2065, according to scientists speaking at the American Geophysical Union, an annual earth sciences conference taking place in San Francisco. Earlier, researchers anticipated that the hole would return to 1980 levels in 2050.

The extra 15 years mean that ultraviolet rays, blocked by ozone in the upper atmosphere, will become a larger health problem for a longer period of time than expected.

"A delay means that ozone will remain lower in later years," said Paul Newman, an atmospheric scientist with the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. "UV levels will be slightly higher in later years."

The culprit in the delay appears to be lingering use of ozone-depleting chemicals, and equipment that contain these chemicals, in developed nations. The Montreal Protocol, signed in 1987 and enacted by laws in various nations, banned the production and importation of fluorocarbons and compounds like methyl bromide in developed nations. Participating emerging nations, meanwhile, put themselves on a program to phase out use of these chemicals.

The treaty, however, didn't regulate the continued use of stockpiles that already existed in the late '80s, when the Montreal Protocol was signed. Those chemicals produced almost 20 years ago continue to leak out and subsequently react with the atmosphere.

"The bulk of them are in equipment--fire extinguishers, air conditioners and refrigerators. These are produced, but unemitted, reservoirs," said Dale Hurst, a research associate with the Earth Systems Research Laboratories at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

On the positive side, the maximum depletion of the ozone should occur between 2000 and 2010 before a slow recovery begins, according to John Austin, a visiting scientist at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.

Hurst added that atmospheric sampling for chemicals with low-flying airplanes above North America make it fairly certain that these gasses continue to emit from the U.S. and Canada.

When gaseous fluorocarbons such as chlorine nitrate or methyl bromide escape into the atmosphere, they eventually circulate toward the poles. There, the cold air causes a chemical reaction that frees the chlorine and bromine. These chemicals then react with ozone, a molecule that consists of three oxygen atoms, and hence eat away the ozone layer. Technically, a hole doesn't emerge, but 50 percent or more of the ozone in a given region vanishes, letting UV rays through.

Bromine destroys ozone more efficiently. However, it also cycles through the global environment much more rapidly, raining back to earth in about eight months. "These kinds of chemicals are easier to deal with," said Hurst.

By contrast, fluorocarbons can linger for years before breaking down.

Atmospheric conditions play a role in how rapidly the ozone declines. The ozone hole is larger above Antarctica because the air is colder. In the Arctic, high winds combined with warmer temperatures have lead to a smaller hole.

While the atmosphere plays a role, there is little debate that the ozone holes are primarily caused by chemicals. Newman, who discounted the role of industrial chemicals in the '80s, said he was wrong.

"There is no question in the scientific community about the role of chlorine and bromine," Newman said.

12 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Ozone hole is a natural occurance
CFC levels will never drop low enough to close the hole. Volcanoes put out great amounts of CFC's. Pinatubo for example, put out, in one eruption, 50x the amount of man made CFC's ever made.

There's also the fact that the ozone is created by ultraviolet light. When the poles are dark, they get very little UV exposure, and much less O3 is created.

CFC's are also heavier than air. So when they leak out, they tend to pool in low lying places. Thats one of the safety concerns when working with coolents. You can be asphyxiated if not careful. Even out doors with a slight breeze, if the ground is depressed even slightly, it will pool.
Posted by shinsa (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Here are some facts...
Here are some facts concerning volcanoes and other natural sources:

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/volcano.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/volcano.html</a>

Volcanoes causing this problem is a myth. Manufactured chemicals causing this problem is an established fact at this point. There have been various studies to prove this.
Posted by (3 comments )
Link Flag
Invalid argument
First page when googling for cfc weigt:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.radix.net/~bobg/climate/weight.argument.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.radix.net/~bobg/climate/weight.argument.html</a>

Your weight argument makes no sense. Fortunately on this matter your ignorant opinion was not followed.

All natural occurances of CFC's are what they are, part of nature. This means it is part of earths ecosystem, so it part the balanced system. Everything we add to it, disrupts the balance.

Don't forget we are dealing with chaotic systems here, small modifications can have big consequences. Ever heard of the quote: "If a butterfly claps its wings in London, a thunderstorm in Moscow is the result of it?"
Posted by Steven N (487 comments )
Link Flag
don't..
try to reason with environmentalists. In the ecofreak world, nature is perfect and any "imperfection" (as defined by ecomania, not by reality) must be caused by man.

There is no reasoning with these people - it's a religion to them, and no amount of science or reason will convince them. It's as bad as trying to discuss evolution with a fundie.
Posted by jawaidbazyar (29 comments )
Link Flag
weather
They write about ozone and globel worming but right not it is 5 deg. cold which is colder at this time then it's been for a number of years.
Posted by sally3745 (9 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Emm, its about average
Global warming is about the increase in average temperature, not at a specific point of time. We are going to have much more extreme weather compared to the recent past, and colder weather is part of global warming, though it sound paradoxical.
Posted by pjianwei (206 comments )
Link Flag
Save the ozon leyer
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.analogstereo.com/cadillac_owners_manual.htm" target="_newWindow">http://www.analogstereo.com/cadillac_owners_manual.htm</a>
Posted by 208774626618253979477959487856 (176 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.