Oracle agrees to pay U.S. $98 million

Oracle has agreed to pay the U.S. government $98.5 million to settle charges that PeopleSoft provided false pricing information to obtain a federal contract.

According to a Justice Department press release issued on Tuesday, federal agencies overpaid for PeopleSoft products from March 1997 through September 2005 because of faulty disclosures by the software vendor, which was acquired by Oracle in January 2005.

The settlement was the largest ever related to the General Services Administration's Multiple Award Schedule program, the Justice Department said. The MAS program requires vendors to provide their commercial pricing information to the government in exchange for the ability to strike deals with hundreds of federal agencies under a single contract. The Justice Department said PeopleSoft's disclosures "were not current, accurate and complete."

"The program works well when vendors follow the disclosure rules and provide GSA with the information it needs to negotiate good prices for government purchasers," Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty said in a statement. "This agreement demonstrates the department's determination to hold vendors accountable for abusing GSA's trust and damaging its programs."

This case originated as part of a whistleblower action brought under the Federal Claims Act. Former PeopleSoft employee James A. Hicks, who filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, will receive $17.7 million of the settlement, as provided for under the statute. Under the Federal Claims Act, whistleblowers can sue on the government's behalf and can garner some of the proceeds of any settlement or judgment.

Oracle said it was not aware of the suit at the time it bought PeopleSoft and said it "cooperated fully with the government" in its investigation of the PeopleSoft contract and the company's conduct. "Oracle is pleased to have fully resolved this legacy PeopleSoft suit and all claims under the PeopleSoft contract," Oracle spokesperson Bob Wynne said in a statement.

[CaptainMooseInc]

Another error in a CNET article

"Oracle said that it was not aware of the suit at the time it bought Oracle..."

It should be: at the time it bought PeopleSoft

Man people PROOFREAD MORE!

[unknown unknown]

RE

Oh wow one typo got through. Seriously, chill-out.

[oraclelies]

Ever Heard of Due-Deligence...

Oracle has always had a difficult time owning up to lying to its customers. This is another point in its long history of doing so. Even the most basic due-deligence process would bring out the list of law-suits a company may have, obviously, they don't want to own up to it since they themselves have consistently defrauded Govt and private institutions on its inconsistent pricing and half-truths about functionality.

Now they are spinning stories about their attempt to integrate applications and a vapourware called Fusion.

If only people knew the truth.