- Related Stories
-
Ushering in a new era of angst at Microsoft
April 11, 2006 -
Red Hat and JBoss: No turning back for open source
April 10, 2006 -
Novell: Linux desktop set to take off
April 10, 2006 -
Is Microsoft playing well with others?
April 7, 2006 -
Suse Linux 10.1 to debut
April 3, 2006
Ron Hovsepian, Novell's president, speaking at a press event in Sydney, said that "about 2,000 employees right now out of 5,000 are single-boot only, which is Linux only, the rest are dual-boot." He said that a project to migrate the 3,000 dual-boot workers to open source is likely to be completed over the next year or so.
The shift from Microsoft Windows and Office to the open-source software was first mooted in March 2004, when Novell Chief Information Officer Debra Anderson was handed the task.
At the time, Anderson said she hoped most of Novell's staff would have moved to Linux and the OpenOffice.org office suite by mid-2005.
Hovsepian's remarks indicate Novell will have at most a few months' experience as a complete Linux and open-source desktop shop behind it when, according to the company's predictions, the software starts taking off in the mainstream. He told CNET News.com on Friday that Linux on the desktop would start taking off over the next 12 to 18 months, with the scheduled mid-2006 release of Suse Linux Desktop 10 being one of the factors fueling growth.
However, while Hovsepian stressed that Novell was "in the process of finishing the migration right now," and Anderson acknowledged back in 2004 that the numbers would never be clear-cut because of dual-booting scenarios, the lengthy time frame required raises questions about the practical challenges for businesses examining a move to desktop Linux and open-source software.
Hovsepian said in Sydney that Novell's desktop Linux implementation had been missing some of the pieces businesses needed, but said version 10 of the software would help the market for desktop Linux adoption.
Regarding his company's own Linux migration, Hovsepian said it had learned a lot from the implementation and had overcome challenges involving, for example, porting macros from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice.org.
"We've had actually very good success with it," he said. "We learned a lot about migration tools, learned a lot about what the usability pieces are."
Renee LeMay of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.
See more CNET content tagged:
Novell Inc., desktop Linux, Sydney, migration, shift




On a second level, we said from the start that we'd be doing a two-stage migration, first to OpenOffice, second to Linux. All of Novell is on OpenOffice now, and, as of Monday of last week, our standard for document exchange at Novell is OpenDocument formats, the default in OpenOffice 2.0. So we are very much moving into a full open source environment.
The underlying suggestion of this article - that Novell's strategy is somehow flawed because of our own speed of transition - just doesn't hold water. We've got plenty of people - including power users - on full Linux and OpenOffice environments.
Thanks.
Bruce Lowry
Novell
What are you guys using for an email clint and server?
On average, if you get paid say ... 20$ an hour, thats about 1 minute a day.
Is there any chance you lost more than 1 minute a day in productivity in this switch?
If so, why bother?
And, finally, why is Novell continuing to do stupid things like this, and buying WordPerfect, instead of doing something useful for its stockholders?
- 10's of thousands of security holes in open source
- by NotParker April 12, 2006 12:37 PM PDT
- There 10's of thousands of security holes in open source.
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- Still clueless
- by Bill Dautrive April 12, 2006 5:37 PM PDT
- Yes, there are flaws in open source programs. However, MS software has at least 100 to 1 open source flaw.
- View reply
Processing -
- trolling
- by April 15, 2006 1:23 AM PDT
- Hey man. stop this! You're loosing it :-)
-
-
(26 Comments)You need to update packages every day to keep up.
Thats costly.
Another thing is that when flaws in open source are found they are fixed in a matter of days, sometimes hours. Compare that to the weeks, months and years of MS.
When you do have to download a patch, you can keep working. Required rebooting is extremely rare, and even restating your windowing enviroment is rarely needed. So downtime is very minimal, unlike winblows.
Your living must be dependant on the ineptitude of MS.
But seriously, remarks like "10's of thousands
of security holes in open source" are really
going too far. But I guess that's what happens
when you "feed a troll".