Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2

December 6, 2005 5:43 PM PST

New IM worm chats with intended victims

  • 43 comments
Related Stories

Study: IM worms up again in November

November 29, 2005

AIM worm plays nasty new trick

October 28, 2005

IM worm speaks your language

August 24, 2005
You can now instant message with a worm.

A new worm that targets users of America Online's AOL Instant Messenger is believed to be the first that actually chats with the intended victim to dupe the target into activating a malicious payload, IM security vendor IMlogic warned Tuesday.

According to IMlogic, the worm, dubbed IM.Myspace04.AIM, has arrived in instant messages that state: "lol thats cool" and included a URL to a malicious file "clarissa17.pif." When unsuspecting users have responded, perhaps asking if the attachment contained a virus, the worm has replied: "lol no its not its a virus", IMlogic said.

The malicious file disables security software, installs a backdoor and tweaks system files, the company said. Then it starts sending itself to contacts on the victim's buddy list.

But the worm is programmed so that the infected user cannot see the messages that are being sent out by the worm, according to IMlogic.

"This is a first," said Andrew Burton, director of product management at Waltham, Mass.-based IMlogic. This worm is not widespread, but attackers are just trying out this new technique, he said. "We will see one or two instances of an attack, there will be a refinement and then there will be an outbreak."

The inclusion of an IM bot is another sign that IM worms are becoming more sophisticated. Another worm, also spotted on Tuesday, takes a more traditional route: it spreads under the guise of a holiday greeting card, IM security specialist Akonix Systems said Tuesday.

The holiday worm, dubbed Aimdes.E, targets AIM users and arrives with the message: "The user has sent you a Greeting Card, to open it visit:" followed by a link. Once the target clicks on the link, the worm installs itself on the system. It opens a backdoor on the computer and sends itself to contacts on the buddy list, Akonix said.

Advice to users is to be careful when clicking on links in IM messages--even when they seem to come from friends--and to use up-to-date antivirus software. When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not.

See more CNET content tagged:
IMLogic, Akonix Systems, worm, victim, IM

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (43 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
haha, thats smart
by digitallysick December 6, 2005 7:06 PM PST
poor windows aol users! they get picked on so bad
Reply to this comment
Are you 5?
by Carmen89 December 7, 2005 6:21 AM PST
you are so childish. Don't act like it's another kick in the mouth for Window users. Only reason why there are so of these stupid viruses are because MS is so widely spread. It's not going to go after a small percentage of users then what the heck is the point of making the virus in the first place. They do it so it spreads in a large lump not the small percent of MAC and other users.
View all 5 replies
This is NOT the first im virus to "talk back"!!
by Digital_Freedom December 7, 2005 5:36 AM PST
I had a yahoo messenger virus do almost exactly the same thing in 2003!! The only difference was that it never told people that it wasnt a virus. What it did say was things like "lol! hey check out this link" and other stuff.. IT got to the point I had to tell people "dont click that, I didnt say that!"... It was a nasty virus that was not listed anywhere. I had to fdisk and format my drive to kill it. So, this is NOT the first time a virus of this nature has been discovered. But, I dont think the virus I found was ever flaged by a anti-virus program.
Reply to this comment
You missed the point
by noname976431 December 7, 2005 7:32 AM PST
There's been lots of viruses/worms/etc that have used IM to spread. And many of them do exactly what you described, send every contatct on a victims list a message that says, 'Check this link' or 'this is cool'. This one does exactly that, however, if a user types a response to the victim, the WORM prevents the victim from seeing the message and the WORM responds to the user. This is very different from what you described.
View reply
Think how nasty they could get...
by cparks0225 December 7, 2005 6:18 AM PST
Just think, these things could read through a user's history files to pick out any type of confirmation that you may currently be using to verify that the links your friends are sending you are sent on purpose. Personally, I think I'm done clicking links through IM.
Reply to this comment
Smart
by Carmen89 December 7, 2005 6:23 AM PST
I think it's just smart to banish clicking links for good. If it's that important they can find another way to inform you on whatever it is they want to show you.
View reply
How about clicking this link?
by cyber_rigger December 7, 2005 7:26 AM PST
Here is the scariest virus site yet.

http://207.46.130.108


Use MS Windows. Live in fear.
View reply
Too Dang Funny - I wonder where the proofreader is today
by December 7, 2005 7:07 AM PST
From the article: "When receiving a link in an instant message, the best practice is to verify with the sender if the link was sent intentionally or not."

Of course, the worm will reply "lol no its not its a virus"
Reply to this comment
What OS?
by flangeku December 7, 2005 8:19 AM PST
I know this is probably for Win2K/XP, but since AOL Instant Messenger is also available for Win98/Me, Mac OSX, and Linux, your article should probably specify.
Reply to this comment
re: WHAT OS?
by NickEP December 7, 2005 3:01 PM PST
Many c|net virus/worm articles either don't mention the affected OS, or bury it later in the story after how the virus/worm affects the user.

This is, simply, bad journalism writing.
It's a .pif file
by aonfiek December 7, 2005 5:46 PM PST
NEVER OPEN A .PIF File

the're old DOS (Windows 3.1) shortcut files.
they can have all kinds of virus code put in them, and because you never see them anymore, be weary of one that someone, or something, wants you to download.
"THIS IS THE FIRST"
by n3td3v December 7, 2005 11:55 AM PST
This is completely false. I guess as always these guys don't know what they are talking about! The guys are making it up as they go along to get media headlines! Why do CNET continue to take quotes from these guys when you can just e-mail me instead?
Reply to this comment
I agree- This is NOT the first...
by Digital_Freedom December 9, 2005 11:49 AM PST
I agree. I hada yahoo messenger virus chat to whoever I was in pm with around 2002- IT too tried to get them to click a link to install hte virus on their computer. The only difference is that my virus never told the victim it wasnt a virus, and I could read what it was saying. This Cnet virus cloaks it's self so the user cant read what it is saying- thats the new part.
Worms
by Eskiegirl302 December 7, 2005 6:21 PM PST
Well I read all the post. Hmmm...Run out and buy and buy Linux or Mac and learn how to use those. Not today but thanks for the suggestion.

Hmm...Make up stories Think even if they are made up I would want the information. Thankyou Cnet.

Hmm...Links in the IM cause the problem. Don't type the whole string (link) to another user. instead of http://www.yadayada.com type yadayada let them type the string. ignore the bots see who is really in the room. watch it for a bit and you will be able to tell.

Like my windows. Keepin it.

Esk
Reply to this comment
Re: Worms
by fairyboi17 December 8, 2005 12:58 AM PST
Honestly, that sounds like a very good idea to just send part of the string (link), but if you are trying to show someone a webpage that you made through a website, such as angelfire, geocities, or myspace, then they are going to need more that just part of the string.
Typical Windoze mentality
by Macsaresafer December 8, 2005 12:21 PM PST
Eskie, I don't doubt that you had a tough time learning to deal with
Windoze, and you naturally think that learning another OS would be
just as difficult, but it's not.

Most switchers are surprised at how much easier the Mac is. Often,
the only thing stopping them from trying things on their Mac is the
fear they brought with them from Windoze. Once they get over
that, it's smooth sailing, and without viruses & spyware.
View reply
Pathetic
by Teome December 7, 2005 7:50 PM PST
How foolish do you have to be to actually fall for that? Wouldn't you realise that it isn't your friend and wouldn't you first check the link location to see what it is?

if you like taking the long way:
-right click
-copy shortcut
-paste to desktop
-right click > properties

...that was tough.
Reply to this comment
AIM in general
by December 7, 2005 11:59 PM PST
I've always found it strange that if one installs or even just runs the executable for AIM, it immediately makes it so if you block aol.com using the hosts file, it does no good--it still lets you go go aol.com. I wonder what they're doing that lets them bypass the hosts file. Since the whole sony thing, I've been wondering whether there's something not-so-cool going on with AIM.
Reply to this comment
There's a difference here.
by Haterabbit December 8, 2005 1:00 AM PST
The problem we're ignoring is that while the idea that clicking a link from someone sending you an obsolete filetype, who's typing like an idiot would be ridiculous to folk like US, There are piles upon piles of people who can't tell a good AV program from their anus. That said, It's unlikely that any of the readers on this website would even think about clicking links which are so blatantly obvious in their virus-hood(?).

Trojans these days are so widespread that it seems unlikely that they're even meant for malicious purposes anymore, so much as they are meant for seeing just how widespread you can make your virus go. Certainly, it makes the system of everyone it infects more vulnerable, but unless the person who creates the virus has a primary plan to actually send out something that will HURT your computer, it's not really worth worrying about the worm. Of course if you get it, you should remove it, and you should be taking necessary precautions to keep from getting it in the first place through use of common sense (as with this one, since obviously a .pif file is one of the least likely to be safe files around...) Or through the use of a good Antivirus program.

Unfortunately not everyone is quite so able to exercise common sense, so here is an easy to remember maxim for those people:

If you don't know how to use your computer effectively, Don't use it.

Computers don't work on their own. They are tools like any other. If your car breaks down, you have to get it fixed. If you computer breaks down, it will not fix itself. Know how your computer works, otherwise I can't be bothered to care when your computer stops working, and you don't know why.
Reply to this comment
They harm you, not your computer
by Macsaresafer December 8, 2005 12:29 PM PST
Rab, be careful. A lot of malware isn't intended to cause a computer
problem. They want your computer to keep working, but for them.
They can send back all your keystrokes, including those from what
you thought was secure banking. They can use your PC for sending
out junk mail and kiddie porn. These things can all create big
problems for you, and without hurting your computer at all.
First time?
by Sentinel December 8, 2005 4:22 AM PST
"The inclusion of an IM bot is another sign that IM worms are becoming more sophisticated."

These techniques have been floating around the Web for years. Back when I used ICQ in 1999, IM Bots sent me porno links all the time, so much I've never used ICQ since then. Also, the technique that only the message reciever sees the message is not new. Last year a friend of mine kept sending me messages with a strange URL, and when I asked him about it, he said he didn't know anything about it.

Both techniques are highly intrusive, but old. They have been used for malicious purposes for years. So why is it only now in the news? The fact that the links installs a Trojan may be the new catch, but it was only a matter of time.
Reply to this comment
I was going to guess....
by Macsaresafer December 8, 2005 9:48 AM PST
that this only affected Windoze systems since they're so easily
defeated. Then I thought it would be better to check it out.

According to Trend Micro it affects: Windows 98, ME, NT, 2000, XP,
Server 2003

Will people never learn?
Reply to this comment
LOL windoze!!!@
by Christopher Hall December 9, 2005 5:21 AM PST
Grow up.
How about Gaim?
by Ron Ammerman December 8, 2005 6:40 PM PST
If a user on a Windows platform was using Gaim (http://gaim.sourceforge.net/win32/index.php), would this IM worm be able to accomplish the same task as a Windows/AIM user? I would imagine that the worm may be able to install itself but might not be able to forward itself to all of your buddies. In this regard, using an IM program such as Gaim might be an attractive choice for windows users.

Cheers.
Reply to this comment
Does it support file transfer?
by stealt403 December 8, 2005 7:29 PM PST
I don't think you can make a folder available for sharing in GAIM, like you can using AIM. Thats my only gripe. Developers are working on it though, and as soon as they include this feature I will switch immediately. I hate how AOL installs all that extra software including their browser, media player, and the rest of the garbage. Then they change your registry to make them all start on system startup. AIM is a memory and cpu hog. I can't wait to get rid of it. Anybody else use any other AIM alternatives?
View reply
Another Windows vs. Mac battle?
by stealt403 December 8, 2005 7:24 PM PST
This argument is getting old. It seems like every new story on cnet about a virus or worm leads to this type of discussion. I think mac users should continue to think they are better than everyone else and keep their mouth shut. Windows users should be more cautious as always and keep virus definitions current. I don't think either side will ever convince the either that they are right and switch OSs. People are self-righteous. I have nothing against mac or windows users.
Reply to this comment
NOT THE FIRST- Cnet is wrong here!
by Digital_Freedom December 10, 2005 11:49 AM PST
I agree.I actually had a yahoo messenger worm that did almost exactly the same thing in 2002-2003! The only difference was thatyou could read what the virus said to the victim (could read the "lol, cool.. check this link out" etc..) CNET: PLEASE DONT CALL THIS WORM THE FIRST THAT CHATS WITH A VICTIM TO DUP THEM TO CLICK A VIRUS INSTALL LINK. It's simply NOT TRUE.
Reply to this comment
(43 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Time Warner (-0.99%) -0.31 30.90
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.18%) -18.90 10,452.68
S&P 500 (0.03%) 0.38 1,109.24
NASDAQ (0.42%) 9.22 2,185.03
CNET TECH (-0.11%) -1.78 1,593.64
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right