October 27, 2005 4:58 AM PDT
Microsoft outlines IE 7 security plans
- Related Stories
-
FAQ: Getting a handle on Windows Vista
November 29, 2006 -
For Windows, today's problems, tomorrow's promise
October 17, 2005 -
Microsoft updates Windows Vista test code
October 17, 2005 -
Microsoft plugs Windows worm holes
October 11, 2005 -
IE flaw puts Windows XP SP2 at risk
September 16, 2005
In a posting on the Microsoft Internet Explorer blog, IE program manager Eric Lawrence said that IE 7 would support the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol by default.
Existing versions of IE automatically use the SSL 2.0 protocol, which is weaker than TLS, to encrypt user data, although it is possible to manually switch to TLS.
Microsoft's decision to ditch support for SSL 2.0 means that any site that still requires this protocol should upgrade, but Lawrence claimed there are "only a handful" of such sites.
Lawrence also explained how IE 7 will behave differently from earlier versions when it encounters potential security problems.
"Whenever IE6 encountered a problem with a HTTPS-delivered Web page, the user was informed via a modal dialog box and was asked to make a security decision. IE 7 follows the XPSP2 'secure by default' paradigm by defaulting to the secure behavior," said Lawrence.
IE 7 will not give users the option of seeing both secure and insecure items within an HTTPS page. With IE6, this option appears when the browser encounters an HTTPS page that includes some HTTP content. But in IE 7, only the secure content will be rendered by default, forcing the user to choose to access the rest via the information bar.
"This is an important change because very few users (or web developers) fully understand the security risks of rendering HTTP-delivered content within a HTTPS page," Lawrence claimed.
Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK reported from London.
7 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=7252" target="_newWindow">http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=7252</a>
I commend them for taking another stab at security, but wonder if the only reason for doing this is that others are already implementing this too.
I hope it translates into real world security and not just some paper jive. My next hope is that Microsoft will adopt standards set by the W3C. I would be nice to be able to take full advantage of CSS 1&2 and someday 3 (and yes I know there are no fully compliant browsers).
I will believe MS is serious about security when they show that they are. All they have shown is that they are serious about talking about security. Security, has never been a priority with the folks in Redmond, It has only ever been worked on after the fact, after trouble has started and even then it is only weak workarounds that cause more problems.
The only way any MS product is going to be secure is if they start from scratch on every product.
XP is loaded with poorly written, buggy and unsecure code from every previous windows release. Vista will be the same, so its chances of being even reasonably secure are nil.