September 2, 2005 12:06 PM PDT

Microsoft limits Longhorn's Itanium job duties

Microsoft's Longhorn Server version of Windows will support Intel's Itanium processor, but only for a limited number of higher-end jobs, the software company said Friday.

Intel in recent years has positioned Itanium chiefly as a processor for powerful multiprocessor servers, a prestigious market, but one much smaller than originally envisioned. Microsoft's move essentially reinforces this big-iron positioning.

"Longhorn Server for Itanium won't run all workloads," a Microsoft representative said in a statement.

The operating system is designed for three specific types of higher-end tasks: databases, custom jobs and line-of-business applications such as accounting and customer relationship mananagment, or CRM. Among the tasks it won't be able to handle are "fax server, Windows Media Services, Windows SharePoint Services, file and print servers, and others," Microsoft said in a bulletin.

Microsoft's move is the latest illustration of the less-ambitious role projected for Itanium. The processor family's debut was marred by delays, poor performance and software incompatibility with servers using x86 processors such as Intel's Xeon and Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron. Many of those initial problems are now fixed, but in the meantime, x86 servers grew more powerful, and IBM ceased developing its own Itanium server. Itanium allies haven't given up and are still working on Itanium market development projects.

The narrower role for Longhorn on Itanium dovetails with Microsoft's plans for an earlier server operating system, Windows Server 2003 R2, which is due out at the end of this year and won't be available for Itanium.

The features coming with R2 are geared chiefly for tasks run by lower-end servers, Microsoft argues. Those features focus on identity and access management, branch office servers, and storage system setup and management.

Novell's Suse Linux Enterprise Server and Red Hat Enterprise Linux also run on Itanium. And Hewlett-Packard, which began the development of Itanium and cooperated for years with Intel on the chip, offers its HP-UX version of Unix for Itanium, as well as its OpenVMS and NonStop operating systems.

15 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
I've got a hunch...
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I've got a hunch...
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I've got a hunch...
... that Linux or Unix will have no trouble utilizing the Itanium
processor for any number of tasks beyond MS's case of myopia.
Sort of looks like MS is trying to slip the shaft to Intel. Maybe it's
time for Intel to come out with a new OS and apps for the Pentium
line... or is that Linux too?
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So what's new?
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Posted by (56 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So what's new?
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Posted by (56 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So what's new?
Windows Server 2003 for Itanium is also pretty limited. The Itanium 2 is an awesome chip, but way too expensive. You could setup a nice load balanced cluster using x86/EM64T CPU's for the same money.
Posted by (56 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Linux on ia64
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try &lt; <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.centos.org" target="_newWindow">http://www.centos.org</a> &gt;

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The point is...
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
Posted by Johnny Mnemonic (374 comments )
Link Flag
Linux on ia64
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try &lt; <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.centos.org" target="_newWindow">http://www.centos.org</a> &gt;

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The point is...
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
Posted by Johnny Mnemonic (374 comments )
Link Flag
Linux on ia64
The article specifically mentioned SLES and RHEL as Linux alternatives for for Itanium, and those are both good (but expensive) products.

If you want a free (enterprise level) alternative to those, give CentOS a try &lt; <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.centos.org" target="_newWindow">http://www.centos.org</a> &gt;

Debian and Gentoo also have ia64 ports.
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The point is...
Linux is extremlely well supported on the Itanium.
Posted by Johnny Mnemonic (374 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.