September 27, 2007 4:56 PM PDT

Microsoft extends Windows XP's stay

Microsoft extends Windows XP's stay
Related Stories

The XP alternative for Vista PCs

September 21, 2007
Bowing to pressure from customers and computer makers, Microsoft plans to keep Windows XP around a little longer.

Large PC manufacturers were slated to have to stop selling XP after January 31. However, they have successfully lobbied Microsoft to allow them to continue selling PCs with all flavors of Windows XP preloaded until June 30, a further five months. Microsoft also plans to keep XP on retail shelves longer and will allow computer makers in emerging markets to build machines with Windows XP Starter Edition until June 2010.

The move indicates the continued demand for the older operating system, some nine months after Windows Vista hit store shelves.

In recent weeks, several PC makers launched programs that allow new PC buyers to more easily "downgrade" their Vista Business and Vista Ultimate machines to Windows XP. Fujitsu, which was among those lobbying for the change, has started including an XP restore disc in the box with all of its laptops running Vista Business.

"This allows the installed base of Windows XP users more time to manage the transition to Vista, which is important for some smaller companies with limited resources," Paul Moore, senior director of mobile product marketing for Fujitsu, said in a statement.

Dell also said it support's Microsoft's decision.

"We believe the additional time will help some customers to prepare for the transition from XP to Vista," the company said in a statement.

Microsoft, for its part, sought to downplay the impact of the move, disagreeing with the notion that there is still strong demand for XP.

"We wouldn't term it strong," said Kevin Kutz, a director in Microsoft's Windows Client unit. "We would describe this as accommodating a certain element who needs more time."

Kutz said Microsoft had seen similar demand patterns with past releases and noted that in the past, old operating systems remained available for around 18 months after the release of a new operating system.

"While Windows Vista sales are still going strong...we recognize there are some customers that need more time," Kutz said.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 88 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
Support?
by csmccoy September 27, 2007 5:29 PM PDT
How long will they support the XP lineup?
Reply to this comment View reply
Who's Microsoft kidding?
by MaLvaDo39 September 27, 2007 5:58 PM PDT
They released an albatross of an OS and now can't easily move
customers to it.

So customers continue to use an archaic XP that is showing its age
vs other OS such as OS X.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Windows XP Extended Stay...
by furball123A September 27, 2007 6:08 PM PDT
Am helping to get a new business off the ground by helping them get their PC/laptops setup & configured. Checking all the vendor websites to see what the cost of new boxes with XP Pro or even Home or Media Center would run. Found exactly 0!!! All I could find was Vista this...Vista that. Was not even a way to choose Vista or XP.

Guess I will need to have them have me purchase an OEM copy for the two systems they need & configure them for XP as soon as I can get my hands on them. Guess will get that copy of Ghost to go with it... at least another $100 or more.

Let's see...their needs are modest...so about $500 a machine...$100X2 for OEM copy of XP & 1 copy of Symantic's Ghost...to about another $100. Hope Microsoft loves that extra $200 & Steve Ballmer can buy some more chairs to throw around.
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
Good move!
by close5828 September 27, 2007 6:14 PM PDT
I'm glad to see that MS listened to its customers and kept XP around a bit longer--after all, they're not exactly losing money if they're still selling licenses to it, are they?

Vista is a nice OS but let us be frank--we would all like to see XP around a bit longer b/c MOST of us only upgrade when buying a new PC. I don't really see the point of buying an OS upgrade b/c in another year or two, I'm probably going to buy a new PC with it pre-loaded.

MS knows that the Vista Upgrade is really not going to have the impact that business customers (who buy new PCs) will have; it is the demand that businesses and corporations will put on them, not the average Wal*Mart consumer. The consumer can buy whatever they want, however they want, and need not worry about compatibility and downtime like a corporation.

How long did Windows 2000 stick around for? My god, I thought it would never die... Besides, MS was never going to kill off XP but just the sale of new licenses--support is scheduled to last until 2016, I last heard.

Lastly, talk about a successful product--XP really has staying power when you consider the demand for this 6yr old OS.

Bugs, Viruses, and Spyware are common place, but then again you can't have 95% desktop market share and not have 95% of the bugs/viruses/spyware.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Windows XP extension
by redkitty September 27, 2007 7:09 PM PDT
It is too late, I bought a MacBook. and I love it.
Reply to this comment
Who's Microsoft trying to fool?
by MendedAxe September 27, 2007 7:10 PM PDT
This is not to allow for people to adapt for the change to Vista. It's to allow time for Microsoft to fix all the problems with Vista. To allow more time for applications to be developed that are Vista compatible. It's simple marketing and money-making strategy for Microsoft while trying to downplay the real fact.
Reply to this comment View reply
Vista is a non-starter for health care providers
by Microsoft_Facts September 27, 2007 7:18 PM PDT
90% of my work is providing IT services to health care providers. There are numerous reasons why this industry isn't even thinking about Vista anytime in the near future. Many are show-stoppers on their own.

Privacy concerns; it is worrisome enough dealing with the new privacy regulations of HIPAA. Now Microsoft is insisting that it farm even more private data from PCs? It doesn't bode well with this industry.

DRM; Many hospitals have implemented PACS systems (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picture_archiving_and_communication_system) Are doctors and technicians going to allow Microsoft to degrade CRT, XRay, MRI, etc images if they look to be pirated movies because they may not be properly digitally signed or something? No health care provider I know of is going to take the chance.

Higher initial costs, higher cost of ownership, higher hardware requirements. Health care costs are high enough, why would any sane provider add to IT costs for a product that offers them nothing in return?

Practice management software vendor support; not a single software vendor that I am aware of is supporting Vista. About 25% of them will say "A few customers were able to make our app run on Vista, but we won't support it."

If Microsoft had a clue they would scrap Vista now, like they did with Windows ME, and start over. Maybe if they listened to what customers need and want they would have better luck. But all Microsoft cares about is jamming it to you and me, anything to maintain the monopoly via predatory practices ultimately harmful to consumers.
Reply to this comment View reply
I use Vista but this makes good points
by Dango517 September 27, 2007 7:28 PM PDT
Sorry Microsoft. In there defence however Vista really isn't all that bad for a new OS. You'll see, once the "Ravers" settle down and SP1 comes out things will change
Reply to this comment View reply
It is going to take more then 5 months
by The_Decider September 27, 2007 7:51 PM PDT
To get Vista ready for home use, and double whatever that takes to get it acceptable to business.


MS needs to stop selling Vista.
Reply to this comment View reply
Microsoft extends Windows XP's stay
by AppleRocks1963 September 27, 2007 10:43 PM PDT
Is anyone surprised? Vista is a chrome plated turd.
Reply to this comment
Bang for the $
by igwt September 27, 2007 11:15 PM PDT
If Vista and the forthcoming Server platform had more bang for the $, the adoption rate would better greater. If businesses and end users have to wait for SP1 to get to stable OS, why rush to deploy?

Since Win 3.x, each upgrade has been painful for business and end users of windows. Either face the new found "does my device work anymore" driver hell or buy new systems. Not to mention man hours for deployment.

While this looks good on MS balance sheets... it doesn't always look good for the rest of the business world. Or end users lost time and/or $.

Compare this cost to say the cost of Linux. Where is the bang for the $ MS?
Reply to this comment View reply
Only 5 months...?!?
by imacpwr September 28, 2007 1:49 AM PDT
Unless Microsoft has a completely new OS waiting in the wings to
replace Vista we're going to be seeing a lot of XP for years to
come..!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
There are other alternatives...
by AMPerez September 28, 2007 2:46 AM PDT
Although Vista has it's problems, I think it's high time that Microsoft needs to scale back on price. As another posted, the ROI is a little too out of reach.

I've already weighed the options, and have decided to use Macintosh systems. Clearly, an option that is a lot more viable at this time, and perhaps in the near future, for more of the masses.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
"the additional time"
by rcrusoe September 28, 2007 3:57 AM PDT
"the additional time will help some customers to prepare for the transition from XP to Vista"

In our case, the steps necessary to run Vista were the same necessary to move to a non-Windows platform. Macs and Linux pcs are now just as compatible with our business as XP.

We're buying new computers, but very few of them run Windows.
Reply to this comment View reply
Umm....Microsoft....
by Ted Miller September 28, 2007 5:12 AM PDT
That "element" you where talking about there...

Umm... I believe that was the majority of your customer base.

Umm... I think you ought to listen to them!

I am a Vista user as well as an XP user. I really believe you should start reading the CNet articles also. You could learn something there. Such as a whole bunch of an element that would still like to be your customers. That is if you would only get their thinking right.

I heard a rumor that Vista was designed to turn customers off from using PC based operating systems. That they would come to prefer your Web Based initiatives coming up in the near future... Is their some truth to that? If so I am one who's going to be really turned off. Period!
Reply to this comment
Show-Stoppers - Not If You Are a Lawyer
by Sumatra-Bosch September 28, 2007 5:53 AM PDT
Microsoft won't bother fixing the technology. They'll get HIPAA amended, first, and when people start dying they'll be able to point at something their lawyers goosed through an appropriations bill, smiling at their wit and diligence.
Reply to this comment
Show-Stoppers - Vista vs. XP's launch
by Microsoft_Facts September 28, 2007 8:11 AM PDT
XP was a non-starter at first for technical reasons. Eventually, with SP2, most of the bugs are finally fixed now as MS tried to retire the product.

With Vista, the "show stoppers" are not technical, instead for reasons due to MS's business decisions. Audio/video not playable unless MS gives you the OK. This list goes on, but perhaps the technical problems that due exist would be eased if it wasn't for the big brother tactics of MS in the operating system.
Reply to this comment
If it smells like...
by 247mark September 28, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
Vista is Microsoft's gift to the hardware vendors, requiring almost all computers to be upgraded or new purchases made. It is Win ME without the BSOD. How could MS be so stubborn and ignorant in claiming that extending the XP offering is just an accommodation? Somebody fire Ballmer. Please.
Reply to this comment
If I buy a licence to use something that doesn't work
by Newspeak finder September 28, 2007 9:36 AM PDT
Remind me what the point is in buying a Vista licence is again.

To get something that requires causes major additional
expenditure to get it to work or to get something that works.

I don't go out and buy a dog licence that forces me to upgrade
my dog.
Reply to this comment
IT'S TIME FOR A MAC!
by NURREDIN September 28, 2007 9:38 AM PDT
I sick of Microsoft making these changes just to force people to purchase software they don't need. I can do everything I want to do with Windows XP, so why should I change if I don't want to and don't have to? Soon they won't support XP and I'll be forced to buy vista or a machine that has it pre-loaded. If I have to buy another machine, I swear it will be a Mac!
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
 See all 88 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

Resource center from News.com sponsors
Aligning CIO & CEO visions
What CIOs need to know

It's a simple truth. The closer you and your CEO see things, the greater your chance for success. Our exclusive report can help you get there—and help your business grow. To get the report, featuring the views of 765 CEOs on innovation. click here

Click Here!
What CEOs think: Innovation Insights for CIOs

Learn How CIOs can deliver strategic success for their enterprises

The New CIO: Beyond Technology

Learn how CIOs become heroes

Podcast: Chris Gorog of Napster

Learn about the impact of technology in strategy execution

The future of the Enterprise

Read more about tomorrow's organization

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right