China is quickly proving to be the next great Internet marketplace, and both Microsoft and Google are prepared to fight for it, starting in American courtrooms.
On Monday, the software giant sued Kai-Fu Lee, a former vice president of search technologies and Microsoft's chief architect of business strategy in China, for an alleged breach of a noncompete and confidentiality agreement. Microsoft also sued Google, claiming it was knowingly complicit in the alleged breach when it hired Lee to head up its new Chinese research center.
Certainly, that Lee was a top developer of speech recognition and search technologies and close to Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates was enough to draw the software giant's ire. But Lee's intimate knowledge of the Chinese Internet marketplace is something both companies likely covet.
News.context
What's new:
Microsoft lawsuit in response to Google's hiring of a Microsoft executive highlights the growing importance of China as an Internet marketplace.
Bottom line: China's Internet audience is second only to that of the United States, and financial analysts believe it will surpass America's Internet population within five years.
With an estimated 100 million people online, China's Internet audience is second only to that of the United States, and financial analysts believe it will surpass America's Internet population within five years. China also has 350 million mobile phone subscribers, 43 million broadband homes and 20 million online gamers--the largest gaming population in the world, according to Piper Jaffray.
China's Internet economy, which includes sales from e-commerce and advertising, also has plenty of room to grow. It's worth about only 5 percent of the U.S. Internet economy, according to analysts at Piper Jaffray. The analysts expect Chinese interactive sales, including online advertising, e-commerce, games and wireless, to be worth $1.38 billion in 2005. Next year, sales are expected to grow 37 percent to $1.9 billion.
"China is going to be the most significant opportunity for growth for Internet companies over the next five years," said Piper Jaffray analyst Safa Rashtchy.
No doubt, China matters a great deal to both companies. Most Google watchers can only remember one other occasion when the company publicized a new hire: When Silicon Valley veteran Eric Schmidt was hired as chief executive in 2001. But the Mountain View, Calif., company touted Lee's hiring as a "commitment to building a successful Chinese product research and development center and to expanding its international business operations" in a statement sent to press outlets Tuesday.
About the same time, clearly miffed Microsoft executives announced the lawsuit.
As former director of Microsoft's China laboratory with 380 researchers, Lee was privy to "Microsoft's overall China business strategy, target areas for expansion, Microsoft's plans for gaining market share with respect to Internet search in China, and Microsoft's key employees, partners and contacts in China," according to the 11-page complaint filed in a Washington state district court.
Microsoft did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Google declined to comment.
Google has long run a Chinese-language Web site, but in the last year, the company has invested more in operating there. According to a report by the Chinese Xinhua news agency, Schmidt made a trip in late June to Beijing and met with officials of the Chinese search company Baidu.com. Last year, Google acquired a 4 percent stake in Baidu.com, which is expected to go public on the Nasdaq stock exchange with a valuation as high as $1 billion.
Danny Sullivan, a search expert and editor of the industry site SearchEngineWatch.com, said he suspects Google might be interested in acquiring Baidu.com, arguably the top search engine in China, so it can comply with government requests for filtering through a separate brand.
This is the search wars, only it's in a largely unrealized market.
The "pwnage" you want so badly is already realizing itself quite well in the US with Google the clear leader in the search wars. Google has reminded us that the company that continues to innovate will always be profitable.
If MS hadn't sued this guy, you know more and more of its execs and top engineers would (and maybe still will anyway) flock to Google. They see potential there, and though there's innovation at MS, it seems they either surpress or can any project that could potentially draw their tech focus away from Windows -- a sinking ship, almost "legacy" in most people's minds these days.
Regardless of company. Non Competing Contracts used to coerce employees into staying onboard is wrong. We do not support endentured servitude in this country. If a company cannot afford to provide a workplace that will keep it's important talent, then it is in the wrong business.
MS and its "innovations" are rightly entering a downward spiral because of their high costs, strict licensing, lock-up business model and insecurity.
Google is attracting top talent these days because they actually innovate and bring their solutions to the market at a faster pace than MS. MS is recycling old technologies, putting eye-candy on them (Longhorn ?) and trying to market them as "innovated products". However with the success of FOSS and Linux, people's awareness about security and software has risen, causing these tricks to backfire.
We are seeing only the beginning of a trend that I suspect is going to continue. MS is going to loose more and more good people to innovators like Google, if they don't get down from their high horse and *actually* start developing some technology that matters in this Internet age.
Chinese authorities have reportedly taken iPads from a third-party retailer, a move apparently brought on by Apple's continued refusal to honor a trademark for the iPad name owned by a Chinese manufacturer.
NY professor believes that a word-based algorithm can help bring together those who believe, with one glimpse, that they have found and lost the love of their lives.
After a higher-than-expected fourth quarter, the video subscription service unburdens itself of a pending yearlong class action suit and settles for $9 million.
Along with green-lighting Google's buy of Motorola, the Justice Department today OKs an Apple-Microsoft-RIM partnership deal to buy Nortel patents, and Apple's plan to acquire Novell patents.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
This week, we pass around Sony's new PlayStation Vita for some hands-on testing, check out HP's newest Beats Audio laptop, and debate the best and worst Valentine's Day gadget gifts.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
China's Internet audience is second only to that of the United States, and financial analysts believe it will surpass America's Internet population within five years. 
i want to see the MS domination pwned :p
The "pwnage" you want so badly is already realizing itself quite well in the US with Google the clear leader in the search wars. Google has reminded us that the company that continues to innovate will always be profitable.
But what good is money when all your talent is leaving?
a downward spiral because of their high costs,
strict licensing, lock-up business model and
insecurity.
Google is attracting top talent these days
because they actually innovate and bring their
solutions to the market at a faster pace than
MS. MS is recycling old technologies, putting
eye-candy on them (Longhorn ?) and trying
to market them as "innovated products". However
with the success of FOSS and Linux, people's
awareness about security and software has risen,
causing these tricks to backfire.
We are seeing only the beginning of a trend
that I suspect is going to continue. MS is
going to loose more and more good people to
innovators like Google, if they don't get down
from their high horse and *actually* start
developing some technology that matters in this
Internet age.
researchers,..."
I recently read and article on News.com quoting Bill Gates as saying
MS doesn't offshore thier (highly paid) knowledge workers!
LIAR!