- Related Stories
-
FAQ: How to smoke out that recalled battery
August 15, 2006 -
Can anything tame the battery flames?
August 15, 2006 -
Apple recalls some MacBook Pro batteries
July 31, 2006 -
Batteries that pack a punch without a pop
July 26, 2006 -
Big tests for fuel cells coming in 2007
July 18, 2006
Low voltage flow from AC adapters, battery type used in Japanese notebooks eliminate fire hazard, companies say.
The story "Japan PC makers: No Sony battery recall needed" published August 17, 2006 at 7:55 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.







So, no Burning Laptop issues at HP? check this out:
http://expressen.se/index.jsp?d=10&a=578852
May 2006, Stockholm paper, HP Pavililion zd 8180EA laptop bought in 2005...the article references batteries as the issue....
*IF* the problem only becomes apparent when the battery is being recharged then their might be some tuth to their & Sony's assertion -- namely that Dell is recharging the batteries at a higher voltage and faster charge rate and it is causing problems.
However, at least in some cases it appears that the "flaming laptops" occured when the batteries were discharging and not connected to an AC adapter. If that is the case, then ANY of these Sony cells may be subject to the problem given the right set of circumstances.
If Dell's explanation of the problem -- small particles of metal left in the casing due to a flaw in Sony's manufacturing procedure (not a design issue per se but a process issue) -- is accurate, then this problem could apply to ANY of the cells produced.
Basically, their explanation is that these particles of metal were left in the battery during manufacturing and eventually work their way through the internal insulation to where they contact something conductive. In the case of small particles of metal, they make contact and almost instantly vaporize -- the result is a damaged/dead battery but no other significant issues. A large particle of metal would have been spotted during QA and would have been discarded. The problem is with the mid-size particles that would have been missed during QA but would be large enough to survive contact long enough to allow rapid discharge of the battery internally (causing a rapid buiid up of heat and gas and... well, you know the rest!).
Based on other comments I have seen, they say this problem takes, on average 10-14 months to occur (probably as the repeated heating/cooling cycles of the battery causes expansion/contraction and eventually works the metal shard through the insulation). Other factors like physical abuse can hasten the process as well.
This is all hearsay, but if it is accurate, then the Dell recall is merely the tip of the iceburg -- and my hat goes off to Dell for being proactive on this one and stepping up the plate and admitting they have a problem.
voltage is improperly induced to the battery, it might have other
effects as well.
In any case, I agree with most of what you are saying.
Except Dell was BEING REACTIVE. As they knew of this issue for
4-5 months, but did nothing! It wasn't until the incidents got air
time all over the news, after a few more incidents, that they
issued the recall.
Also, they didn't admit they have a problem. They stated that
Sony has a problem. But there might be truth to the article,
where if the power system was PROPERLY implemented, maybe
most of this wouldn't have happened.
later
- Toshiba Laptop Battery Question
- by GreenApple123 September 5, 2006 2:04 PM PDT
- I bought a replacement battery for my Toshiba laptop about a month ago from http://www.laptopsforless.com/laptopbattery/toshiba-battery and it works great. Is there any reason to think that a replacement laptop battery would be any worse than the manufacturers?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)