February 11, 2005 4:00 AM PST
Is your TV virus-proof?
- Related Stories
-
Symbian boosts security and enterprise apps
February 2, 2005 -
Worried about Wi-Fi security?
January 19, 2005 -
Hacker worries raise hackles
January 10, 2005 -
Cabir worm code wriggles onto Web
December 30, 2004 -
Time Warner Cable mulling wireless
November 3, 2004
A variety of consumer products--from smart phones to digital theater boxes, and from car navigation systems to home security gear--have gone digital. In addition, wireless connectivity has become a cheap add-on for gadgets.
What's new:
A variety of consumer products--from smart phones to digital theater boxes, and from car navigation systems to home security gear--have gone digital.
Bottom line:
With that new technology comes exposure to a digital ill already the scourge of PC users: computer viruses.
With that new technology comes exposure to a digital ill already the scourge of PC users: computer viruses.
"Like humans in a sterile environment, an unconnected device has no chance of infection," said Dan Cregg, vice president of home-automation company Smarthome. "But once you are connected to the outside world, then you are in danger."
Experts agree that with a rapidly expanding landscape of network-ready consumer products, there will be an explosion in opportunities for virus writers. While that hasn't happened yet, it's easy to see how and why it could, said experts.
Today's viruses and "bot" software aim to infect PCs and steal information, or to draft the systems into an online army that obeys the original attacker. Tomorrow's malicious code could disable home security systems, tinker with the TV, steal digital music collections or even lead a driver astray.
"The world of tomorrow includes all sorts of devices connected to networks via wireless, and this will present us with a new set of challenges and threats targeted at relatively vulnerable devices," Ajei Gopal, senior vice president of technology at security software maker Symantec, said in a speech at the Harvard Business School last month.
Danger: Switches and sensors can't be infected but could be controlled. Central server could be an infection point, especially if connected to the Internet.
Danger: Cell phones, which increasingly resemble small computers, will be a likely target of viruses that gather identity information.
Danger: Most are based on a PC and a standard operating system, so could come under attack as more people connect their devices to the Internet.
Danger: Though cars have a myriad of processors, most cannot be programmed remotely. GPS navigation computers could be a target, but offer little of value to attackers.
Danger: From Roomba vacuums to Internet-connected refrigerators, more devices have processors and bandwidth connections, but they hold little information of appeal to intruders.
Gopal also said that security software companies are at least thinking about how to minimize the danger of such threats. "Creating better protection for the mobile environment is critical, and these are issues that must be addressed in both (networking) infrastructure and on the devices."
As yet, there has not been a full-blown attack on non-PC devices. Mobile phones, which a report last week from IBM highlighted as the next major target of viruses, have just begun to attract writers of malicious programs. Some malicious cell phone programs--particularly the Cabir and Skulls viruses--managed to trick some people into installing them, though they did not become widespread.
The IBM report predicted, however, that the cell phone viruses will spawn a number of offshoots, because the source code for Cabir has been released. It also said that malicious programmers are likely to increasingly focus on finding new ways into systems, using the relatively recent Bluetooth wireless protocol and voice over IP, for example.
An antivirus company said last month that a Lexus car dealership had found a virus infection in the GPS navigation computers in several of its luxury cars. In fact, the reported infections turned out not to exist. Some technology experts believe that virus writers aren't interested in going after less common devices yet.
"Most hackers and virus writers that are trying to use your assets will program for the common denominator," Smarthome's Cregg said. "For computers, they program for Internet Explorer, not Apple's browser. Likewise, there are not that many people on non-PC platforms to make development worth it."
David Emm, a senior technology consultant with Russian antivirus specialist Kaspersky Labs, was asked by one of his company's customers to investigate the possibility of infecting a Lexus. Though the
4 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
Windows in your car....then you will deserve it when you breaks
lock up while on the highway because your car's "brains" had a
critical error and had to dump its memory.
When will the lemmings learn.
The only real way to be secure it to build your own OS or make it proprietary enough that a virus that works on one system can't just jump to another or simply doesn't function or the system. The issue is cost. Building an OS is obviously more expensive then nabbing one that is pretty much ready to go out of the box with only minimal tweaking required. That is why you are seeing everything from ATMs to cars running Windows. Its cheap. You can determine whether Im talking price, quality or both.
Although, I really don't care for the idea of needing to pay $300+ for a code key to access and drive my new car or for that matter, the ability to use my new electric shaver.
I wonder about the potential threats associated with the possibility of my electric shaver sending digitized DNA data over the internet through a WIFI setup to anyone.