IBM sold its personal computer business to Lenovo in 2004, but Big Blue is expected to announce a product Wednesday that shows it still has some interest in the market.
The technology isn't a straight-up PC, though. Instead, it combines IBM's BladeCenter servers with VMware's ESX Server software for running multiple operating systems on one computer and Citrix Systems' software for letting people tap into programs running on a server.
The technology name also is more complicated than a simple PC: IBM Virtualized Hosted Client Infrastructure. But the company believes the approach will be compelling for businesses wanting to cut costs and ease management.
IBM's BladeCenter houses as many as 14 dual-processor servers in a chassis 12.25 inches tall, and Doug Balog, IBM's new vice president of BladeCenter products, said 12 to 15 separate PCs can simultaneously run on each blade.
"That would allow over 200 clients in a BladeCenter chassis," Balog said.
Using VMware, though, lets many PCs be squeezed onto each server. "There are competitive offerings that pick up the electronics of the desktop and move it to the data center, but it's still a one-to-one relationship and isn't as cost-effective in our view," Balog said.
The technology is beta testing now and should be available in the first quarter of 2006, Balog said. There's no specific product bundle available, though IBM resells VMware and Citrix products.
The VMware approach permits a server CPU to reach at 80 percent utilization, a much higher level than the average PC. And the VMware software lets a specific PC be shuttled from one computer to another if more computing resources are needed.
While the PC software runs on the blade servers, people access it using a "thin client" from a company such as Wyse or Neoware, Balog said.
There is a public service like this which provides a free for life personal online desktop at <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.cosmopod.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.cosmopod.com</a>
There is a public service like this which provides a free for life personal online desktop at <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.cosmopod.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.cosmopod.com</a>
"On Demand Computing". Heaven only knows why on Earth did IBM not continue with its "WorkSpace On Demand" (WSOD) strategies that it embarked upon some years ago. In today's world of "pervasive" and "wireless" computing one can only conclude that this initial strategy has come full circle. "Redundancy" it is believe - takes care of "server failures"!
"On Demand Computing". Heaven only knows why on Earth did IBM not continue with its "WorkSpace On Demand" (WSOD) strategies that it embarked upon some years ago. In today's world of "pervasive" and "wireless" computing one can only conclude that this initial strategy has come full circle. "Redundancy" it is believe - takes care of "server failures"!
When large companies can purchase PCs for only a hundred or so dollars more than they'd pay for a thin client, why invest in server architecture that's more expensive than using traditional MS and/or UNIX servers? The manufacturing client I work for looked at replacing shop floor systems with thin clients, and found cost increases, rather than cost savings.
Most companies are less concerned with ease of administration than with TCO - having the administrator work 30 hours instead of 50 doesn't save them money.
This kind of technology strategy made good "sense" to a an organization such as NORAD ( <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.norad.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.flash" target="_newWindow">http://www.norad.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.flash</a> ) looking to not having to "secure" every computer "hard-drive" after every shift! Just as in a similar way "safety" deposit boxes exist in countries around the world it is assumed.
When large companies can purchase PCs for only a hundred or so dollars more than they'd pay for a thin client, why invest in server architecture that's more expensive than using traditional MS and/or UNIX servers? The manufacturing client I work for looked at replacing shop floor systems with thin clients, and found cost increases, rather than cost savings.
Most companies are less concerned with ease of administration than with TCO - having the administrator work 30 hours instead of 50 doesn't save them money.
This kind of technology strategy made good "sense" to a an organization such as NORAD ( <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.norad.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.flash" target="_newWindow">http://www.norad.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.flash</a> ) looking to not having to "secure" every computer "hard-drive" after every shift! Just as in a similar way "safety" deposit boxes exist in countries around the world it is assumed.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
Most companies are less concerned with ease of administration than with TCO - having the administrator work 30 hours instead of 50 doesn't save them money.
Most companies are less concerned with ease of administration than with TCO - having the administrator work 30 hours instead of 50 doesn't save them money.