October 2, 2007 4:00 AM PDT
For handset makers, it's all about location
- Related Stories
-
Nokia to buy Navteq for $8.1 billion
October 1, 2007 -
GPS traffic reports for impatient drivers
April 27, 2007 -
Sprint to include free GPS with data services
March 21, 2007 -
Handset makers get in on location services
February 15, 2007 -
Helio adds new GPS-enabled phone
November 8, 2006 -
Protective parents: Gold for cellular services?
April 7, 2006 - Related Blogs
-
Disney Mobile bites the dust
September 27, 2007
news analysis The young market for so-called location-based services may have just found a shortcut to mainstream adoption.
Nokia's announcement Monday that it will purchase digital-map provider Navteq for $8.1 billion illustrates the premium that both mobile handset and services providers are placing on location-based services. It could also mean that budding market will briskly move from niche service to standard feature.
"Everyone's going to have to move in that direction. You'll be missing something if you don't have (location-based services)," said analyst Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates.
Location-based services (LBS) is a phrase used to describe the combination of the mobile Web and GPS data. It's a feature that will become even more in demand as portable gadgets become ubiquitous and staying connected assumes first priority. Add-on services are also one of the most surefire ways for manufacturers to make a few extra dollars in profit margin on consumer hardware. A side effect of the appeal of LBS on omnipresent devices like cell phones is that standalone GPS devices could go the way of the PDA.
Up to now, location-based services for most people meant getting directions from one place to another. But the vast database of location data that companies like Navteq can provide to mobile service providers, ad and marketing companies, and hardware makers opens some intriguing possibilities.
Giving directions is one thing, but when your device knows where you are, a slew of services can be tailored to your specific geographic needs. You could, for example, find the closest Starbucks, the locals' favorite Thai restaurant, or the gas station with the lowest prices. You could plan for inclement weather, reroute your commute around road closures or accidents, compare prices while shopping for gadgets or appliances, or keep tabs on friends or family members.
That Nokia would be the one to scoop up Navteq wasn't necessarily expected, but the Chicago-based map provider has been an acquisition target since navigation device maker TomTom offered to purchase Navteq rival Tele Atlas this summer for just over $2 billion. Navteq is one of the largest providers of digital mapping services, and Google was seen as a likely suitor. The world's No. 1 handset maker stepped in instead, leaving Google and any others fairly slim pickings in terms of acquisition targets now that the two biggest LBS companies have been snatched up.
LBS will be in higher demand by a whole host of industries beyond mobile phones, namely business that sell, well, anything, Gold said. Auction sites, like eBay for example, could find location services helpful in authenticating mobile purchases from its site. And companies such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft that are targeting advertisements will always want more specific information about consumer characteristics, preferences and locations to tailor their messages.
The technology to do this is already available, but for the most part, it is not yet linked to an individual's specific location. The availability of GPS chips in devices is the main barrier in mainstream adoption. "We're very GPS-poor from a device standpoint," especially here in the U.S., said Gold.
See more CNET content tagged:
handset maker, handset, Nokia Corp., GPS, location
11 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
I am thinking about companies like AND Automotive Navigation Data from the Netherlands or Europa Technologies from the UK.
Anyways, I would be surprised if neither Garmin, Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc would not respond in any way.
Its very expensive to literally map the globe and get the details that they do.
From the news.com other stories, I don't believe that these are done deals and that in both the TomTom and Nokia acquisitions, there still could be a bidding war.
Like the other poster said, there is no number 3 of worldwide significance. The investment to create a full blown worldwide database is simply too big in the current corporate culture (fast growth, minimal costs). It takes years to build a geographical database, with huge resources involved (both technological as human), no company is willing to pour money into creating a third provider...
I took a look at OpenStreetMap, and while I really like the OSS idea behind it, there is no way this will ever grow into a product comparable to what Navteq or TA are doing
Not really...all mobile phones since 2002 have come location-enabled due to the FCC mandate around mobile e911. In fact all CDMA phones (Verizon, Sprint, Alltel) have AGPS chipsets allowing for very accurate location fixes. The barrier to entry as always is the business case. Out of any country in the world, the US is the farthest along regarding location-capable devices...Not always GPS, but AGPS and the like. More information on the FCC mandate is here: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2001/nwl0127a.pdf" target="_newWindow">http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/2001/nwl0127a.pdf</a>
1)how to measure the rate of mobile multimedia consumption and
2)whether mobile handsets are ergonomically suited for mobile multimedia
3)how to harness vehicle dashtop to synergize mobility and the speed of multimedia
4)how to identify a new generation of mobile devices that can cope with battery life, screen sizes and ergonomic features suitable for users on the go, particularly at the wheel.
Look at some regions in the maps of Microsoft/Google.