March 13, 2007 1:57 PM PDT
Federal agencies ban Windows Vista
- Related Stories
-
Vista for the masses
April 4, 2007 -
No 'Second Life' for Microsoft's Vista
February 13, 2007 -
Symantec CEO says no Vista for me
February 13, 2007 -
With Vista, seeing is believing, says Gates
January 29, 2007 -
Buying Vista? Get a guarantee
January 29, 2007 -
Tool helps programs befriend Vista
May 24, 2006 -
IBM goes slow on XP update
August 9, 2004
The Department of Transportation (DOT) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cite fear of compatibility problems as one of the reasons not to allow their tens of thousands of employees to upgrade to Microsoft's latest operating system.
"We are temporarily not permitting computers with the Vista operating system to be connected to our networks," Michael Baum, a NIST spokesman, said Tuesday. The organization's technology staff is testing NIST applications and evaluating the security in Windows Vista. The same holds true for Internet Explorer 7 and Office 2007, he said.
It is not unusual that agencies aren't rushing to install major software updates. Large organizations in particular tend to do a lot of testing before upgrading. The same happened when Microsoft released Service Pack 2 for Windows XP. The actions by DOT, which employs about 54,000 people, and NIST, with 2,900 employees, were first reported by Information Week.
The DOT also bans Vista, Office 2007 and IE 7. In addition to compatibility concerns, the department lists cost, available funding and a pending headquarters move as reasons not to upgrade, according to a DOT memo dated January 19 (click for PDF of the memo). The memo is still current, a DOT representative said Tuesday.
"There appears to be no compelling technical or business case for upgrading to these new Microsoft software products," according to the memo. The department plans to issue an update next month to clarify its strategy for 2008 and beyond, the representative said.
In a statement, Microsoft said it is working with many government agencies to help them adopt its latest products. "We respect the customer's decision," the company said.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the largest organization under the DOT, is taking the opportunity to consider alternatives to Microsoft's operating system and productivity software, said Tammy Jones, an FAA spokeswoman. This includes including running Linux on desktops and using Google's online applications, she said.
"We're trying to see what the cost impact would be to the FAA to convert to the new Microsoft products," Jones said. "We want to explore what some of the alternatives are. Google is one that we're looking at, so is Linux." The FAA has about 45,000 employees.
Vista has been available to businesses since late November and was released to the general public at the end of January. About 90 million copies of the operating system will be installed this year, predicts IDC. The analyst firm also foresees that consumers will be first to adopt the system. Businesses should be cautious, IDC advises.
"Business customers should take a cautious approach to adopting new Windows technologies and need to go through a normal evaluation cycle," IDC analyst Al Gillen wrote in a recent report. "Most organizations should incorporate a move to Windows Vista in their longer-term road map--unless they are planning to move toward competitive solutions."
Many organizations will need up to 18 months after the Vista ship date to verify their applications, get other software makers to support the operating system and run tests, analyst firm Gartner said in a December report. "Sooner or later, most organizations will deploy Windows Vista," Gartner's analysts said.
See more CNET content tagged:
memo,
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7,
Microsoft Office 2007,
Microsoft Windows Vista,
organization

aHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaH
aHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaH
aHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaH
aHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaH
aHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
This is such a non-story. The article makes it sound as if this problem is unique to Windows Vista when in truth, it was the same problem between the 9x-to-NT kernel switch and the switch from Mac OS 9 to OS X (blasphemy!)
The Federal government shouldn't upgrade for hundreds of reasons (Vista's poor performance on older hardware, expense, etc.), the least of which is application incompatibility.
It will happen!
As for Mac/Linux, sure, less than 10% of all computers users use Mac/Linux, if they grow a % or two, it really doesn't matter much to MSFT!
If you need a new OS, you'll pay for it...
Apple fanboys take a bite - Apple wont sell you XP either.
And, have you seen the prices lately? What a rip-off.
Chinnese and their product quality has suffered. I could bearly
communicate with them, it was very frustrating.
Plus MS treats it's vendors like crap.
Viva Linux and OS X, I hate MS, they are selling our jobs
down the toilet to foreigners.
tasks. Actually it would more than double the efficiency of the
average worker, (Next to no crashes, virus free and Macs have
less IT related fixes as compared to Windows).
I believe its because its more expensive to overhaul an entire
setup that revolves around old PC hardware. That also another
reason why they won't run Vista (the markup is high, and old
hardware won't run it). Thats why the only other choices are
Linux & Google's Web 2.0 Application offerings. Why they never
considered Open Office, beats the pants out of me. Last I
checked it was free.
But in order for Apple to succeed in Gov't agencies, they would
have to move all their Mac Hardware to Intel processors and
atleast allow Macs dual boot in either Linux, Windows or the Mac
OS
Oh wait its been done.
I guess its only a matter of time, before they wise up, I suppose.
Yeah they will be ready in 2015 to move to Vista, after billions of our dollars are spent to do a study to see if its feesable.
WORKS !!
P.S. Yes.. you guessed it... I use a Mac..
I'm waiting till I've performed all my hardware upgrades first, then I'll buy vista home premium, install and activate it.
By the time I do that, They'll have Sp1 ready to roll.
Microsoft & I dare anyone to disprove that..." Citizen Gates on
why Vista OS is great for enterprise operations... THEN WHY
WOULDN'T THE US GOVERNMENT NOT WANT TO USE IT AS SOON
AS POSSIBLE?
By having multiple Government agencies stating that they will
not upgrade to Vista OS for quite awhile & that their staff cannot
upgrade their laptops / desktop computers to Vista OS for
interconnecting to the government servers, THAT IS SENDING A
MESSAGE to the public at large that Vista is NOT as secure &
reliable as Citizen Gates thinks it is...
This is a rippling effect that will cause many people in business
to stop, think, wait & see, let all the bugs & security issues with
Vista be ironed out before we think of maybe upgrading in the
future...
Not a good sales motivator for business, staff & IT departments.
Security & reliability was a big selling point for Microsoft to get
the government & business people motivated about upgrading
to Vista OS...
Not good for Redmond One.
I'm 79 this year, so I may never see Vista or IE 7. Good luck to all you young pioneers.. Ed..
- Flamers SUCK!
-
by System Tyrant
March 16, 2007 7:57 AM PDT
- This is pointless, but some of you need to take a chill pill. I'd be willing to bet that most of you flamers a) have no life; b) have barely any real computer skills; c) play with yourselves a little to much; and d) still think your opinion matters more than anybody else's. Grow up.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
See all 115 Comments >>First off the government didn't actually ban Vista. They simply aren't going to rush out and buy it without testing it first. In the meantime they are evaluating other platforms. In a year or two they may very well be using Vista or Linux or even a Mac or some combination of the three. Who knows.
Here's some points. First off just because people aren't flocking to Vista doesn't mean they are migrating to some other OS. Business invest a lot of money in software and some (or probably most) of it won't run on anything other than Windows. Chances are they aren't going to toss away millions of dollars just because they decided they don't like Microsoft. If they migrate it will be slowly over many years. Same goes for the government.
I don't comment much anymore (not than any of you care) because ninety percent of the comments here are posted by clueless basement dwellers who live in fantasy land. Oh, well see you all in the funny papers.