August 8, 2006 5:01 PM PDT
FAQ: Protecting yourself from search engines
- Related Stories
-
AOL's disturbing glimpse into users' lives
August 7, 2006 -
AOL apologizes for release of user search data
August 7, 2006 -
Feds suggest 21-day deadline for Google subpoena
March 10, 2006 -
Google may have to fight second subpoena
February 17, 2006 -
Verbatim: Search firms surveyed on privacy
February 3, 2006 -
Judge postpones Google subpoena hearing
February 2, 2006 -
FAQ: What does the Google subpoena mean?
January 20, 2006 -
Privacy experts condemn Google subpoena
January 20, 2006
Search engines place a multibillion-dollar infrastructure at the hands of any random user who stops by their Web site. The price you pay, however, is that the company may hold on to your search queries--which can provide a glimpse into your life--forever.
To offer some suggestions about preserving your privacy while using search engines, CNET News.com has prepared the following list of frequently asked questions.
Q: Why did AOL publish those search histories?
A research arm of AOL published the data in hopes the information would help other scientists and statisticians learn more about how people use the Internet. AOL apologized for this on Monday, saying the release had not been properly vetted.
Q: How can I protect myself from a search engine doing the same thing in the future?
Because of the negative press AOL received, the company is not likely to do the same thing anytime soon.
But of the big four search engines (AOL, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo), only Google resisted a Justice Department subpoena that asked for similar search terms. Keep reading for more detailed suggestions.
Q: Why do search engines store what I type in after my search is
complete?
No law requires search companies to delete your search terms, and there
are some business justifications for keeping them around at least a little while.
For instance, keeping detailed records can help in identifying click fraud (faking clicks on Web ads to drive up a rival's costs), and in optimizing search results for different geographic areas. Compiling a user profile can aid in tailoring search results in products like Google Personalized Search. Also, disk storage is cheap, and engineers tend to prefer to keep data rather than delete it.
But it's hardly clear that a compelling reason exists for keeping older records--beyond a few months--unless a customer voluntarily chooses options like personalization.
Q: Do any search engines not store records of what their users do?
Yes. Ixquick.com, a
start-up funded by Holland Ventures of Amsterdam, pledges to do precisely
that.
The Netherlands-based company proudly says it doesn't keep records of its users' Internet addresses. In other words, it does save search terms, but the company says it's unable to link them to any person, unique ID number or Internet address.
"I'm a firm believer in the privacy cause," Ixquick.com CEO Robert Beens said in a recent interview with CNET News.com. "I can imagine a lot of people are keen on their privacy."
Beens said that "we delete the (Internet protocol) address of users. We have a program running which opens the log files and deletes the user IP addresses and overwrites them." And, Beens said, the company removed the unique ID from Ixquick.com's cookies.
Q: Is AOL thinking of doing the same thing?
Nobody knows. But Jason Calacanis,
who co-founded blog publisher Weblogs Inc., which AOL bought last year,
says it should.
In a blog post on Monday, Calacanis wrote: "Frankly, I want us to NOT KEEP LOGS of our search data. Yep, you heard that right... we shouldn't even keep this data."
Q: How does Ixquick.com work?
Ixquick.com is what's known as a meta-search engine. For U.S. queries,
it contacts Yahoo, AltaVista, Alltheweb, Entireweb, Amazon, Netscape,
Wikipedia and a handful of other sites. It compiles the results,
decides which Web sites received the most votes as relevant, and
displays the top scorers.
"It is possible to fool one search engine by modifying the links, tags, or content of the site," Beens said. "To fool 11 search engines is very hard."





says about Ixquick:
"The Netherlands-based company proudly says it doesn't keep
records of its users' Internet addresses. In other words, it does
save search terms, but the company says it's unable to link them
to any person, unique ID number or Internet address."
"'I'm a firm believer in the privacy cause,' Ixquick.com CEO
Robert Beens said in a recent interview with CNET News.com"
Beens, too, is unclear on the privacy concept. As the AOL
scandal showed, just the list of searches alone can be enough to
identify who is searching. AOL released no more info than Beens
collects, yet it was enough to reveal the searcher's identity.
NONE of these people - and that includes reporters - can be
trusted to have thought the privacy issue through and have a
competent grasp of culture, technology, legality, and yes,
mendacity.
its very possible not to without compromising your internet experience
search engine companies have become a proxy government with too much information about people
u wouldnt tell the government your personal life
so why submit keywords to search engines when you know they are passed onto the government if
the police think you've commited a crime
even if you didn't commit the crime
your civil liberties are breached
stop thinking search engine are neutral
thats crap
they hand over your information to the intelligence services all the time
you wouldn't goto a 'mi5' or 'mi6' search engine to do your searches
but by using google and yahoo search, thats basically what you're doing
boycott all search engines
its just a myth that you need them
there are other ways to find out about web sites
you can post to public web forums and ask for information on a subject, and 99.9% of the time someone will post you a URL or recommend you a site
thats what i do
let others search for you...
who would be so gullible to use a search engine?
not i
test yourself for four weeks
the test is, don't use a search engine for 4 weeks..
try it for yourself, its easier than you think
Complete privacy and security from any PC or device connected to the internet that you happen to be using at the time with absolutely no way for the PC to track where you have been.
Complete privacy and security on your credit card statement.
And, there is absolutly no software needed, it is ISP based, so it works from any and all PC's today!
This new Patented technology is an "Indirect Portal", not a proxy, an will change how users surf the internet forever. Why? You need to do nothing except surf from NotMe when you want complete and utter privacy. The way the internet used to be way back when.
Complete privacy and security from any PC or device connected to the internet that you happen to be using at the time with absolutely no way for the PC to track where you have been.
Complete privacy and security on your credit card statement.
And, there is absolutly no software needed, it is ISP based, so it works from any and all PC's today!
This new Patented technology is an "Indirect Portal", not a proxy, an will change how users surf the internet forever. Why? You need to do nothing except surf from NotMe when you want complete and utter privacy. The way the internet used to be way back when.
Try it its free anyway. http://www.blackboxsearch.com
And its FREE. http://www.blackboxsearch.com
notme.com/getme:url13567.aspx When U close the page the link recorded is expired. The site visited has zero clue who you are... and zero way of identifying you. You don't even need virus protection nor spyware protection... can't get one =)
Proxy's are a joke...an Indirect Portal is the only way of achieving Complete Internet Stealth. notme.com to find out more...
I uninstalled everything and am never using AOL.
That company screwed up majorly. I would fire all the company executives who are reposible for these problems on the spot immiediately and the dumb ass CEO.
Why does a normal person need to worry about getting information they deem sensitive. They do, and many people do not want AA or The Herpes Cafe or the Aids Hotline or RAINN in their histories yet need the help desperately...
done
Notme.com go wherever you want and no one will ever know, unless you break the law...
- IP's Are Often Static
-
by good_nicks_taken
August 13, 2007 9:04 AM PDT
- If you use a router and you don't turn it off and have Comcast it's likely you will have the same IP for years. You don't need to be on some special network. If you go into your router and change the MAC address you will get a new IP. Some routers allow you to copy the MAC address of your PC's NIC instead of sending the MAC address of the router. Comcast will then give you a different IP.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 21 Comments >>