December 14, 2005 10:38 AM PST

Europe passes tough new data retention laws

Related Stories

Must we renew the Patriot Act?

December 12, 2005

Terrorism threat to Net overblown

November 23, 2005

EU reveals phone, e-mail snooping plans

August 2, 2005
The European Parliament on Wednesday passed new, far-reaching data retention legislation for the telecommunications industry.

The directive will require Internet service providers and phone companies to keep data on every electronic message sent and phone call made for between six months and two years.

"Agreement on retaining communications data places a vital tool against terrorism and serious crime in the hands of law enforcement agencies across Europe," British Home Secretary Charles Clarke said in a statement. "Modern criminality crosses borders and seeks to exploit digital technology."

However, the data retention has been criticized as a threat to the personal privacy of European citizens.

The parliament voted 378 to 197, with 30 abstentions, for a package already agreed to by the assembly's two biggest groups and member states, with European Commission backing.

Telecommunications providers will now have to keep data such as the time of each fixed and cell phone call made in Europe; whether a call is answered or not; the duration of the call; and other details that can help trace the caller. On the Internet side, they will be required to retain information on the times people connect to the Internet, people's IP addresses, and details pertaining to e-mail messages and VoIP calls. The content of the communications will not be recorded.

The legislation is being championed by the U.K. and other governments. They say it will help trace terrorists through communications records. The change in the law was proposed during the U.K.'s presidency of the European Union in the wake of the July 7 bombings in London.

Telecommunications companies and ISPs expressed concerns about the financial impact of the parliament's decision, as the new law will drastically increase companies' storage costs, but makes no move to compensate providers.

"This directive will impose a significant burden on the European e-communications industry, impacting on its competitiveness," Europe's telecoms and Internet industries said in a joint statement.

According to the British government's Home Office, EU member states could begin implementing the directive as early as next year.

A separate directive from the European Commission to keep data for six to 12 months was passed earlier this year, despite fierce criticism from both the public and private sector.

Jo Best of reported from London. Reuters contributed to this report.


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Monsters under the bed
Isnt it remarkable how many laws are being passed these days in the name of combating terrorism?
Now that the Great Evil Communist Empire has fallen, the West needs a new boogie-man to scare people back into mindless acceptance, of whatever agenda our governments are trying to push.

What happens after the Middle East is quiet again: Create another war? Or start blaming Martians for all our sins?
Posted by Marcus Westrup (630 comments )
Reply Link Flag
re: Monsters under the bed
From USA Today:
the Justice Department recently acknowledged that 88% of the search warrants issued under this provision [of the "patriot act"]have been used in cases that have nothing to do with terrorism.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Same with teh U.S.; kiss your rights goodbye. We seem to hate our freedom, too.
Posted by kayoub (7 comments )
Link Flag
Monster Madness
Apparently, the Iranians want to be next on uncle Georgies invasion list.
Posted by aqvanavt (17 comments )
Link Flag
So the terrorist revert to snail mail. So will all envelopes soon need a carbon copy front so the post office can tear it off and store it 2 years? .
We take our shoes off in some airports, cant even have more than 100ml of drinking water even if delays in departure lounge.
These political idiots use sledgehammers to crack the nuts. Rather than make such decisions they should charge the surveillance authorities to apply their reasoning to a longer term objective which is more cost effective and less intrusive on the mainstream of community. I have been running a genealogy website for nearly 10 years and have no intention of retaining any visitor logs or email logs.
I do it for love and will not become a dammed servant for some jumped up inconsiderate legislator
Posted by paul_wonnacott (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.