Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon

Editors' Picks

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Whatever it looks like it will be unique
by Jonathan July 27, 2004 7:55 AM PDT
I'm not a fan of the iMac. Quite frankly I couldn't care less about the all in one design in that it locks you out from some upgrades. Want to upgrade your monitor? Good luck. Want to upgrade your computer? You end up paying twice as much because you have to replace the monitor as well. But I'm a tech head and I'm a power user so that's just my opinion. That being said the iMac once souped up with a G5, which current rumors hold to be released sometime this fall, it will make an impressive opponent to the midrange PC desktop.
However, and this is big, Apple's prices still aren't in line with the industry and its dwindling market share demonstrates this in a dramatic fashion. I don't care what any Machead says market share DOES matter. It matters to the developers who invest time and a hell of a lot of money porting from one OS to another. (You don't port a piece of software from ix86/Windows to PPC /MacOX over night.) It matters to the consumer who looks at that shelf of software in the apple store and thinks why is it so small in comparison to the PC software at best buy. Row upon row of software is reassuring to the user that yes my platform will be here in 10 years. Yes. Yes I'm well aware that people have been predicting the death of Apple for over a decade now. However the face remains Apple's market share has never been this low. It should be a major concern to anyone who is interested in Apple being around 5, 10, 20 years from now. The only people who aren't concerned are the Mac zealots in the crowd.
How does this tie into the new iMac? Simple. These midrange systems are where PC sales are hitting their stride. This is where Apple needs to make some serious sales and that requires not only the ability to crank out a ton of these systems FAST, (Way faster then PowerMac G5's that were introed last year at any rate.) the ability to cut prices to meet competition, and the ability to build a quality product. (Sorry folks but spending time on the various Mac BBoards there are SERIOUS QC issues at Apple on every product they have including software.) Apple needs to compete. Enough of this laid back, whatever type attitude. If they are going to remain a computer company (Which I'm starting to question what with Apple seriously focusing on Music and the iPod.) they need to kick some butt. Minimum 10% market share if they hope to be around in 15 years. Windows is only going to get better. The past and current thinking is that Windows is an unstable, insecure, difficult POS. I agree with the last two. But unstable in NOT the case. If MS can fix the latter half of those complaints Apple is screwed. People use Windows because its good enough. I've never heard anyone other then Windows zealots sing praise to windows. If MS can get Windows to be better then good enough Apple is in deep trouble. Here's hoping that in the next two years before Longhorn Apple catches a wave of success beyond just the iPod.
Reply to this comment
what a bullshit story
by July 27, 2004 9:08 AM PDT
fluff. . . if you've got some news to report on this, then why not
report. . . but cnet has become such a hack for worthless fluf. . .
Reply to this comment
It will look like a MacGameCube of course...
by mcclop July 27, 2004 10:19 AM PDT
visit http://www.macgamecube.com of course
Reply to this comment
It will have a built-in dock for the iPod
by mcclop July 27, 2004 10:19 AM PDT
of course
Reply to this comment
Really Innovate w/ Mac blades... bMacs
by kreynen July 27, 2004 12:05 PM PDT
Apple has the XServer, XRAID, and beautiful LCD displays. Rather than target the stand alone consumer with another interesting form factor, give me a 1U rack capable of running 4 bMacs or a 3U rack capable of running 14 bMacs with Apple-quality hardware for extending the USB and DVI cables.

Use the virus backlash and go after the office and big edu lab installs. Sell the blades as G4 to start (fine for most business and lab use) with G5 blades compatible with the racks next year. Upgrading labs would be as easy as swapping a drive in a RAID array.
Reply to this comment
Who cares, it's still just a Mac!
by July 27, 2004 12:46 PM PDT
Why would someone care when over 90% of the world's computers are Microsoft based. They need to put more money into the quality and performance of their computers and lower the price. Don't waste time on some cutsey looking pc, get a pc for it's functionality and performance.
Reply to this comment
hope monitor is separate!
by technewsjunkie July 27, 2004 1:12 PM PDT
The all-in-one in education, K-12, should no longer be the only
option from Apple.
The cost of repairing/replacing the monitor for these out-
weighs the benefits.
Reply to this comment
refined functionality
by tomshaughnessy July 27, 2004 2:21 PM PDT
There is every reason to expect the next consumer oriented Mac
to carry forward the design elements of the current iBook, iPod,
and Airport Express consumer products. And so, my gut tells it
will integrate the design of the new pro monitor with the white
consumer cosmetic branding elements. It seems reasonable
from a manufacturing and shipping cost perspective that the
design will move the traditional CPU oriented functions into the
back of the monitor - optical drive, peripheral bus connections,
etc. This means the only wires necessary will be power and
possibly ethernet. The speakers, keyboard and mouse could
reasonably be Bluetooth. Given the current demand/delivery
restrictions on the G5, it would seem higher yields for 130
nanometer chips in the 1.8 range seem appropriate. 17 and 20
inch monitors are reasonable as is SuperDrive throughout the
likely 3 models.
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement