April 18, 2006 9:22 AM PDT

Earthquake fears prompt business continuity

SAN FRANCISCO--On April 18, 1906, San Francisco was rocked by an earthquake that destroyed large swathes of the city and claimed the lives of more than 3,000 inhabitants of the Bay Area.

One resident, the author Jack London, wrote at the time: "San Francisco is gone. Nothing remains of it but memories...Its industrial section is wiped out. Its business section is wiped out. The factories and warehouses, the great stores and newspaper buildings...are all gone."

A century later, a bigger, bolder, rebuilt and more resilient San Francisco is more important than ever. Now it sits near the heart of the global IT industry and serves as a major world financial center. But it remains well aware of the terrible potential that exists along the San Andreas fault.

special coverage
Seismic science
On the 100th anniversary of the great San Francisco quake, scientists look to tech to help predict the next big one.

The vast skyscrapers downtown may now be built to withstand huge pressures, but what about the infrastructure and the systems that keep modern business ticking--and the people who must be able to access them? Business continuity and disaster recovery are serious issues for all organizations in the Bay Area.

Barry Cardoza, head of business continuity contingency planning and disaster recovery at Union Bank of California, which is based in downtown San Francisco, told Silicon.com that earthquakes are a major consideration in the area but only as part of a complex patchwork of worst-case scenario planning--which includes everything from pandemics to terrorist attacks and acts of civil disorder.

"You have disasters that you can see coming, and you've got disasters that you can't see coming," Cardoza said, "and an earthquake is an example of (the latter). And you don't know how bad it's going to be until it hits."

As such, the bank must have processes in place ahead of such an event to mitigate the threat. Simply reacting is not a strategy. The contingency department must also understand every aspect of the business and weigh downtime for each in terms of financial and reputational damage.

Stock traders, for example, might need to be at their most active in the wake of a disaster.

"If they can't react when the markets are impacted," Cardoza said, "then that could put you out of business. They might normally be turning over millions, but the losses could be in the billions."

Multiple data centers in diverse locations, mirrored sites that can take over at the flick of a switch, "hot sites"--where staff can walk in and start working exactly as they would if they were in their normal location--and a vast amount of redundancy are also key to business continuity planning, said Cardoza, who is a member of the Bay Area Recovery Coalition with a number of peers from other major banks.

"We have real-time mirroring between data centers," he added. "It's no longer a question of how long will it take us to back up from tape. It's a matter of minutes not hours once we switch over."

See more CNET content tagged:
business continuity, business continuity planning, San Francisco, Bay Area, disaster

4 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
CISSP
Disaster planning/recovery is one of the reasons the CISSP certification was developed. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be much call for this skill: Many execs that I've dealt with feel that disasters are someone else's problem, or that recovery will somehow be quick and easy.
My point is, not enough is being done to prepare for disasters in the IT business community. The talent base is out there, but there is little desire to make use of it.
I'm glad to see San Francisco is taking steps, but what about the rest of the country?
Posted by Marcus Westrup (630 comments )
Reply Link Flag
CISSP
Disaster planning/recovery is one of the reasons the CISSP certification was developed. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be much call for this skill: Many execs that I've dealt with feel that disasters are someone else's problem, or that recovery will somehow be quick and easy.
My point is, not enough is being done to prepare for disasters in the IT business community. The talent base is out there, but there is little desire to make use of it.
I'm glad to see San Francisco is taking steps, but what about the rest of the country?
Posted by Marcus Westrup (630 comments )
Reply Link Flag
What's NEW about this?
Redundant disks, redundant servers, redundant switches, redundant routers, redundant power supplies, redundant tape backup, redundant wiring, redundant sites... you name it... and they've all been around for ages.

Anybody who REQUIRES to be online 24 hours a day already has all of the redundancy they need.

So why is chicken little screaming about "the sky is falling" or "the earthquake is coming" now!

Walt
Posted by wbenton (522 comments )
Reply Link Flag
What's NEW about this?
Redundant disks, redundant servers, redundant switches, redundant routers, redundant power supplies, redundant tape backup, redundant wiring, redundant sites... you name it... and they've all been around for ages.

Anybody who REQUIRES to be online 24 hours a day already has all of the redundancy they need.

So why is chicken little screaming about "the sky is falling" or "the earthquake is coming" now!

Walt
Posted by wbenton (522 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.