September 27, 2004 10:19 AM PDT

Disabilities Act doesn't cover Web, court says

Web publishers are not required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a federal appeals court has ruled.

Acting largely on procedural grounds, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a lower court's decision from October 2002, which concluded that Web sites cannot be required to comply with the 1991 disabilities law. An advocacy group for the blind had sued Southwest Airlines, seeking a redesign of its Web site.

Still, the three-judge panel noted that a future case could provide a vehicle for exploring the question in greater depth. "In declining to evaluate the merits of this case, we are in no way unmindful that the legal questions raised are significant," wrote Judge Stanley Marcus.

If the case had turned out differently, the outcome could have had far-reaching effects by imposing broad new requirements on companies hoping to do business online in states in the 11th Circuit, which includes Alabama, Florida and Georgia.

The ADA says that any "place of public accommodation" must be accessible to people with disabilities, and the law lists 12 categories, including hotels, restaurants, shopping centers, universities and bowling alleys. It does not name the Internet.

This lawsuit was filed by advocacy group Access Now and a blind man named Robert Gumson. They admitted that it was possible for the blind to buy tickets on Southwest's site but argued that it was "extremely difficult." Gumson, who said he had a screen reader with a voice synthesizer on his computer, asked the judge to order Southwest to provide text that could serve as an alternative to the graphics on its site and to redesign the site's navigation bar to make it easier for him to understand.

Since the time the lawsuit was filed, Southwest appears to have redesigned its Web site to be easier to navigate for the blind. CNET News.com was able to make reservations using the Lynx text-only browser without encountering any compatibility or navigation problems.

Courts have reached different conclusions about whether the ADA might apply to the Web. The 7th Circuit suggested in 1999 that the ADA may apply to a Web site or other facilities that exist only electronically. But the Access Now v. Southwest case was the first to address the question directly.

At a February 2000 hearing, a board member of the National Federation of the Blind asked Congress to expand the ADA. "I urge this subcommittee to affirm the importance of access to this new world we're entering and to differentiate between the real-world needs of blind people and the hypothetical and yet-unproved burden placed on small businesses being required to ensure access," board member Gary Wunder said.

Last month, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group released an updated working draft of its extensive guidelines for online publishers. They suggest, for instance, text tags on graphical elements and captions accompanying a video clip in an online news story.

1 comment

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
There are none so blind
I'm not visually impared. I think this adpating of all things to a disabled underclass will go a long way toward making normal people feel absolutely gifted.
When "wide" tolerances become law, tolerance becomes the norm and intolerance becomes, well, intolerable. When wide torlerances become the norm, complex sytems break down.

The legal machinery has disconected from reality. Lawyers have been hated, on the historical record, since the middle ages anyway maybe we need to put a leash on lawyers to save civilisation.
Lawyers are the least civilised civillians.
Posted by (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.