August 28, 2007 3:17 PM PDT

Court rules against TorrentSpy in hacking case

A correction was made to this story. Read below for details.

A lawsuit filed last year by TorrentSpy--a BitTorrent search engine--that accused the movie studios' trade group of intercepting the company's private e-mails, was tossed out of court last week.

But while a U.S. District judge found that the Motion Picture Association of America had not violated the federal Wiretap Act, as TorrentSpy's attorneys had argued, the MPAA acknowledged in court records that it paid $15,000 to obtain private e-mails belonging to TorrentSpy executives.

The MPAA's acknowledgement is significant because it comes at a time when the group is trying to limit illegal file sharing by imploring movie fans to act ethically and resist the temptation to download pirated movies. To critics, the revelation by the MPAA is a possible sign that the organization is itself not above adopting unethical practices in its fight against file sharing.

"Ethically, it's pretty clear that reading other people's e-mail is wrong," said Lorrie Cranor, an associate research professor and Internet privacy expert at Carnegie Mellon University. "Being offered someone else's e-mails by a third party should have been a red flag."

The MPAA, which says that illegal file sharing costs the film industry more than $2 billion annually, did not respond to interview requests.

In court records, the MPAA said that the person who obtained the e-mails did so before approaching the group with an offer to sell the information and that he signed a contract stating he had come by the correspondence through lawful means.

Ira Rothken, TorrentSpy's attorney said: "We believe that the MPAA, when it paid $15,000 for about 30 pages of e-mails, knew or should have known they were involved in purchasing something in a wrongful manner."

Rothken said that TorrentSpy will appeal the court's decision that the pilfering of TorrentSpy's e-mail did not violate the Wiretap Act.

According to court documents, the MPAA came into possession of the e-mails after first being approached by Robert Anderson. Anderson is a former business associate of Justin Bunnell, TorrentSpy's founder.

Anderson allegedly "hacked" into TorrentSpy's e-mail system and rigged it so that "every incoming and outgoing e-mail message would also be copied and forwarded to his anonymous Google e-mail account," records show.

Anderson contacted Dean Garfield, the MPAA's senior legal counsel, in June 2005. Anderson told Garfield that he had an informant who supplied him with the e-mails.

District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper also agreed with the MPAA that TorrentSpy failed to prove that the information obtained by Anderson qualified as trade secrets.

Correction: This story misidentified the former business associate of TorrentSpy's founder. His name is Robert Anderson.

See more CNET content tagged:
Dean Garfield, file-sharing, Judge, hacking, attorney


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
MPAA to the masses: "Do as we say, not as we do".

I do not feel bad if I download a movie to watch.

Hollywood makes WAY too much money, and movie stars disgust me with how much money they make.
Posted by Mergatroid Mania (8395 comments )
Reply Link Flag
at teh bottom of teh sea

a start

not quite haiku
Posted by gggg sssss (2285 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Makes me feel dirty.
I just got back from watching a movie. Any association with the MPAA makes me feel contaminated. Unlike the MPAA I have a respect for the law so I will not download movies, however I am tempted because of the actions they have taken.

The actions of the MPAA may not be illegal, however they are immoral. Unauthorized downloads of movies may be illegal, however I no longer consider it to be immoral.
Posted by ralfthedog (1589 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Last I heard...
Last I heard...

Social Engineering was a form of hacking!

What they did was a form of social engineering!

Posted by wbenton (522 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.