August 24, 2004 11:52 AM PDT

College P2P use on the decline?

A combination of authorized music services and lawsuits is helping to control illegal file swapping on campuses, a joint entertainment industry-university group said Tuesday.

In the last year, more than 20 schools have signed up for deeply discounted access to music services such as Napster, MusicNet and RealNetworks' Rhapsody, the Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and co-chairman of the joint group, said in a conference call with reporters. "A legion of college music fans who are getting their music for free and getting the impression that music has no value are now being introduced to the idea that music does have value."

In some cases, the traffic devoted to peer-to-peer networks on campuses has dropped by as much as half, the group said.

The report to Congress comes two years after the formation of the cross-industry group and more than a year after the consortium began focusing heavily on ways to provide legal music services on campus that might entice students away from peer-to-peer networks.
Our reporters' take on what's
happening in broadband.

The group's efforts have been augmented by the SonyBMG-led Campus Action Network (CAN), which has helped make introductions between university officials, record labels and music services for at least 10 campuses.

Napster was the first company to sign a campus deal, agreeing to offer service to the Pennsylvania State University last spring in a pilot program. The fees, which were undisclosed, were folded into a mandatory information technology charge of $160 a year imposed on students. University representatives have said the fee was not raised as a result of picking up the Napster service.

Penn State President Graham Spanier, who also serves as co-chair of the joint college and entertainment industry group, said on Tuesday that the pilot program had been a success and that it would be rolled out to all of the university's campuses this fall. In the pilot, up to 100,000 songs had been downloaded a day by the 12,000 students participating, he said.

"I think this will all mushroom (to other universities)," he said. "For universities, it's really not just a legal issue. It is an ethical, it is a moral issue."

Napster has since announced eight deals with universities, while MusicNet, distributed through partner Cdigix, has signed six. RealNetworks said Tuesday that it had made two college deals--with the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Minnesota--to provide students with subscriptions to its Rhapsody service for less than $3 a month.

Special series
Digital Agenda: Broadband shows how the U.S.
can build a broadband network.

Apple Computer offers site licenses for its iTunes music software to universities, which can include volume discounts for song purchases. The company said Tuesday that 55 colleges have taken site licenses to iTunes.

Those low rates are made possible, in part, by a deep discount from record labels on the amount they charge for digital music services. A representative for one digital music company said that music publishers, which are also entitled to receive a small portion of payments, have not granted similar discounts.

Sherman and Spanier said that these new services, along with education campaigns and new technologies blocking peer-to-peer swaps, have diminished file trading on campus, but the two men provided few concrete details on overall reductions.

File sharing, particularly the swapping of video files, remains popular with many students, however.

A peer-to-peer network called i2Hub has recently appeared on the supercharged Internet2 network, which enables students at participating campuses to download files from each other's system at rates much faster than on the open Internet.

Spanier and Sherman said that the film industry has also been involved in the joint group's efforts and that the on-campus services would likely expand more deeply into video in the future.


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Less downloading, more CD burning
Sure, downloading by kids has been reduced. Nut CD (and dvd) burning at home is growing wild.

But we have to ask ourselves, why should anyone respect the copyright owners when they are really mostly businesses that connived the creators into giving away their work.

Until people accept that the major beneficiaries of copyrights should be the creator artists and not businesses there will no be the proper respect for the copyrights.

As long as the widespread rumor is that too little of copyright income filters down to the artists there is no valid reason for respecting the copyrights.

Since many artists are incapable of exploting their work and since some creation is too expensive (such as movies) business will alway have a role in the exploitation of art. But the role should be controlled so that income is properly shared with the artists. This control does not exists because the copyright law was made by the businesst lobby.

As an example, my father may have been one of the greatest 20th century composer. The music publishers ran away with the music and my father made no money at all. The rest of the story is here: <a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Posted by (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Power to Independent Artists
A growing number of musicians are no longer associated with the RIAA's big record companies. Recording their LIVE concerts and burning CDs for their fans is so easy now. Jerry Garcia dreamed of this more than a decade ago and his "Grateful Dead" buddies are doing it now! String Cheese Incident and other emerging bands have jumped on the bandwagon too. No doubt, that the artists are getting a bigger piece of this pie; because their crews are marketing the finished product directly to us. How ironic, that the artists who peddle digital sound board recordings are the least likely to complain about kids downloading inferior compressed MP-3 files on line...
Posted by cousinkix1953 (27 comments )
Reply Link Flag
decline in music
there comes a time in every music downloader's life where they can no longer think of any songs that have yet to be downloaded. they have downloaded every song that they care to download and thus stop the downloading. that, my friends is why there has been a decrease in the downloading of music. there is no more music to download.
Posted by threedguy (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.