- Related Stories
-
China accused of cyberattacks on New Zealand
September 13, 2007 -
Homeland Security IT chief blamed for cyberwoes
June 20, 2007 -
Coming attractions for history's first cyberwar
June 15, 2007 -
Cyberattack in Estonia--what it really means
May 29, 2007 -
Cyberattacks at federal agencies draw House scrutiny
April 19, 2007 -
Homeland Security finally transcends F cybersecurity grade
April 12, 2007 -
Homeland Security sees cyberthreats on the rise
February 8, 2007 -
Cyberthreat experts to meet at secretive conference
January 22, 2007 -
Senator blasts Homeland Security's Net efforts
July 28, 2006 -
Locking down America's Net defenses
February 16, 2006 -
U.S. cybersecurity due for FEMA-like calamity?
October 10, 2005 -
Power outage hits Northeast
August 15, 2003 - Related Blogs
-
Will cyberintrusions crash U.S. electrical grid?
October 17, 2007 -
U.S. cybersecurity czar: Help us help you
October 1, 2007 -
Cyberattacks at DHS prompt new finger-pointing
September 24, 2007 -
Bush, Estonian president talk cyberattacks
June 25, 2007 -
Congress to grill Homeland Security on cyberweaknesses
June 19, 2007
The SANS Institute, a computer-security training body, reported the CIA's disclosure on Friday. CIA senior analyst Tom Donahue told a SANS Institute conference on Wednesday in New Orleans that the CIA had evidence of successful cyberattacks against critical national infrastructures outside the United States.
"We have information that cyberattacks have been used to disrupt power equipment in several regions outside the U.S.," Donahue said. "In at least one case, the disruption caused a power outage affecting multiple cities."
Donahue added that the CIA does not know who executed the attacks or why but that all of the attacks involved "intrusions through the Internet."
The CIA analyst added that his agency had evidence of blackmail demands following demonstrations of successful intrusions.
"We have information, from multiple regions outside the U.S., of cyberintrusions into utilities, followed by extortion demands," Donahue said. "We suspect, but cannot confirm, that some of these attackers had the benefit of inside knowledge."
The CIA does not normally make this information public. According to Donahue, the CIA actively and thoroughly considered the benefits and risks of making this information public and came down on the side of disclosure, the SANS Institute reported.
Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute, warned more than three years ago about demonstrations of denial-of-service attacks to computer systems, followed by demands for cash.
Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.
See more CNET content tagged:
cyberattack,
SANS Institute,
blackout,
U.S.,
attack






checked or verified. I've learned a very long time ago that just
because someone says something, doesn't make it true. (Does "Iraq
has weapons of mass destruction" ring a bell?)
With the low level of trust of anything government these days, this
report seems like pure FUD to me.
hacker being able to shut down a power grid are minimal, and
even if they did succeed it would be a simple matter to bring the
power grid back up. This is hardly a threat, and hardly news.
What is more worrisome is will the Bush Administration use the
'fear' generated by this story to take control of, and disable, the
Internet to 'keep us safe'? We should be far more worried about
that, than a couple of hackers flipping a switch OFF that can be
turned back ON in a matter of seconds.
In addition, even Saddam's generals thought they had huge bunkers full of poison gas, etc, and were shocked to discover it was not so. Saddam was an incompetent meglomaniac who relied on being able to terrorise to stay in power.
The power grid is much more fragile than you might think, and the total cost of all the different minor expenses resulting from it being knocked down is pretty high. "A million here, a million there... Pretty soon you're talking about big money."
Considering what governments (all governments, not just "Bushitler", etc) do to everything they gain control of, I don't want them anywhere near the internet. To my thinking, this indicates the utilities need to spend money to prevent problems. Considering how greedy the owning/controlling companies are... I am not hopeful.
Well, not yet. Some people I correspond with have worked for power companies, and they are pessimistic about the grid's resilience.
Also it seems like i just had my nights sleep in the wrong town.
Year down with the CIA
WHY IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLUGGED INTO THE INTERNET?!?!?!
Obviously the intelligence agencies are putting fear in the citizens to get their way. Provide facts and details or lets just write it off as propaganda.
- Do the Google news search.
-
by cyberbian
January 22, 2008 10:15 PM PST
- I thought the refusal to name names was suspicious and hinted at disinformation.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- Did you really expect them to announce WWIII has begun!
-
by cyberbian
January 22, 2008 10:22 PM PST
- The most obvious reason that the CIA would hide the targets is that it reveals the identitys of the attackers.
-
-
(19 Comments)A Google news search makes this credible to me!
You cannot hide what is already public knowledge. It only leaves to speculation, how many players are active in this cyberwar. I make out at least two based on my presumption that all blackouts searched are player generated.
I speculate that where two are obvious, more are in play.
If you knew the player roster, you might realize that WWIII is underway!