Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Dennis Hopper Diagnosed with Cancer

October 17, 2005 4:48 PM PDT

Barney: I sue you, you sue me

  • 32 comments
Related Stories

EFF appeals Apple fan site ruling

March 22, 2005

Free speech feels Net copyright chill

October 24, 2002

EFF enters image-linking debate

February 27, 2002

Taming the Web

April 19, 2001
For a plush purple dinosaur who extols the virtues of affection and amity, Barney can be surprisingly aggressive in his legal demands.

Barney's lawyers at the New York firm of Gibney, Anthony and Flaherty sent stiff warning letters last week to Web sites displaying less-than-flattering images of the plump saurian.

"Your Web site depicts a plush Barney toy in a violent manner or position," Matthew Carlin wrote Tuesday on behalf of Lyons Partnership, which owns the Barney trademark. "We are writing to request that you remove this violent content toward Barney on your Web site."

Barney
Credit: Stuart Frankel
Barney's lawyers say this photo
amounts to an unlawful use
of the cartoon character.

One of the ostensibly violent sites, a site maintained by Baltimore-area programmer Rob Carlson, depicts a Barney toy suspended from the ceiling. Carlson, who has not removed the photograph, says it has been online for at least five years and nobody has complained before.

Carlin said he could not discuss his law firm's next steps in attempting to remove offensive images of Barney from the Internet. "I really can't comment," he said Monday in a brief telephone conversation.

Another letter from Carlin was directed to Stuart Frankel, who maintains the "Source of All Evil" site with a rendering of a vaguely Satanic cartoon tyrannosaur. "It is unlawful...to use this property without the permission of Lyons Partnership," Carlin wrote. "These materials must be immediately removed."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco civil liberties group providing legal representation to Frankel, dismisses the legal threats as nonsense. "I think that Barney is unfortunately looking like he's becoming a recidivist in phony copyright claims," said Cindy Cohn, EFF's legal director.

In 2001, EFF took on Barney's lawyers after they sent out similar cease-and-desist letters. At the time, Cohn wrote back saying that anti-Barney screeds were protected by the First Amendment rights to publish parodies, and Barney's owners never pursued the matter further.

Since then, the EFF managed to break new legal ground by forcing voting machine maker Diebold to write a check to settle allegations of copyright misuse. "We were very happy to cash that check for $125,000 from Diebold when they made phony copyright claims," Cohn said. "I'd be happy to cash one from Barney."

Barney's lawyers have been aggressive in pursing trademark lawsuits before. They once sued the creator of a sports mascot that, as part of its performance, assaulted and generally did violence to a Barney look-alike.

But the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 1999 that the performance was a parody and not forbidden by trademark law. "Even if young children--like the 2-year-old who had such a traumatic reaction to the downtrodden Barney--are in attendance, we would expect them to be supervised by parents who could explain the nature of the parody," the court decided.

See more CNET content tagged:
Diebold Inc., lawyer, letter, photograph

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (32 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Barney everywhere ?
by My-Self October 17, 2005 6:52 PM PDT
Looks like we're gonna see those pictures in all kinds of places now ...

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad name ?
Reply to this comment
Yeah, I'm thinking about it...
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:24 AM PDT
I might just find parody barny images and host some (with the parody creators permission of course).
What I don't get is...
by October 18, 2005 11:02 AM PDT
Why that picture? Ok maybe the inverted pentagram is going a little far but one would think a character of Barney's caliber would be the target of some people with those really nice editting programs. You know, Barney strapped under a Titan V. Barney in the French fleet at Trafalgar. I mean, something a little more unbelievable than a fanged, horned, devile Barney.
Just 99%?
by J_Satch October 18, 2005 11:43 AM PDT
I thought they were all evil...
View reply
Barney everywhere ?
by My-Self October 17, 2005 6:52 PM PDT
Looks like we're gonna see those pictures in all kinds of places now ...

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad name ?
Reply to this comment
Yeah, I'm thinking about it...
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:24 AM PDT
I might just find parody barny images and host some (with the parody creators permission of course).
What I don't get is...
by October 18, 2005 11:02 AM PDT
Why that picture? Ok maybe the inverted pentagram is going a little far but one would think a character of Barney's caliber would be the target of some people with those really nice editting programs. You know, Barney strapped under a Titan V. Barney in the French fleet at Trafalgar. I mean, something a little more unbelievable than a fanged, horned, devile Barney.
Just 99%?
by J_Satch October 18, 2005 11:43 AM PDT
I thought they were all evil...
View reply
More stupid lawyer tricks
by R. U. Sirius October 17, 2005 6:55 PM PDT
Now it is apparently illegal to do parody or satire? These Barney lawyers have gone too far and need to be disbarred - NOW!
Reply to this comment
They do what their client pays them to do...
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:21 AM PDT
They are only doing what their client wishes them to do. It is not illegal (though it should be) to threaten someone with legal action under a law that they interpret differently than the courts.

This should be considered extortion.
More stupid lawyer tricks
by R. U. Sirius October 17, 2005 6:55 PM PDT
Now it is apparently illegal to do parody or satire? These Barney lawyers have gone too far and need to be disbarred - NOW!
Reply to this comment
They do what their client pays them to do...
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:21 AM PDT
They are only doing what their client wishes them to do. It is not illegal (though it should be) to threaten someone with legal action under a law that they interpret differently than the courts.

This should be considered extortion.
Remember this?
by Bob_Barker October 17, 2005 7:15 PM PDT
Circa like 96 or so. http://impressive.net/games/barney/fun.cgi
Reply to this comment
Remember this?
by Bob_Barker October 17, 2005 7:15 PM PDT
Circa like 96 or so. http://impressive.net/games/barney/fun.cgi
Reply to this comment
Anyone Remember the Barney Blaster
by October 17, 2005 8:56 PM PDT
Does anyone remeber the old <a href="http://208.185.149.219/
getbits.acgi?tbart=01762" Title="Still available" After Dark Barney
blaster module? Laugh, Laugh, bang, ow, boom!
Reply to this comment
Anyone Remember the Barney Blaster
by October 17, 2005 8:56 PM PDT
Does anyone remeber the old <a href="http://208.185.149.219/
getbits.acgi?tbart=01762" Title="Still available" After Dark Barney
blaster module? Laugh, Laugh, bang, ow, boom!
Reply to this comment
Won't CNet be sued?
by SocialConservative October 17, 2005 10:01 PM PDT
By hosting the offensive image in the article, isn't CNet putting itself at risk of legal action?
Reply to this comment
Probably not...
by Maelstorm October 17, 2005 11:23 PM PDT
...because C-Net is a news wire and they are protected under the First Amendment. Freedom of the press, remember? That won't stop these corporate thugs to keep trying though....
Not the same thing.
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:23 AM PDT
They are reporting on a news item and not creating a parody of their own. They could host pictures of other copyrighted works without fear of lawyers knocking down their door.

If a solid claim did come in for any story, they would simply comply and remove the material. The owners of the Barny image would have to prove some form of slander in the article or the inclusion of the image to have a legal basis though.
Won't CNet be sued?
by SocialConservative October 17, 2005 10:01 PM PDT
By hosting the offensive image in the article, isn't CNet putting itself at risk of legal action?
Reply to this comment
Probably not...
by Maelstorm October 17, 2005 11:23 PM PDT
...because C-Net is a news wire and they are protected under the First Amendment. Freedom of the press, remember? That won't stop these corporate thugs to keep trying though....
Not the same thing.
by zaznet October 18, 2005 1:23 AM PDT
They are reporting on a news item and not creating a parody of their own. They could host pictures of other copyrighted works without fear of lawyers knocking down their door.

If a solid claim did come in for any story, they would simply comply and remove the material. The owners of the Barny image would have to prove some form of slander in the article or the inclusion of the image to have a legal basis though.
Sorry Barney!
by October 18, 2005 7:09 AM PDT
The kids love you, the adults hate you, what's a sophmoric purple dino to do? Get out the lawyers!
I propose a Barney bonfire at the next burning man. Bring all the tapes and plush toys you can get your hands on, big props to those that actually bring big props. Perhaps we can nail that big purple beast on the cross to burn.
Dearest Barney:
It really hurts when you grow up and discover that no adult actually believes the pap you fed us as children.
Reply to this comment
Sorry Barney!
by October 18, 2005 7:09 AM PDT
The kids love you, the adults hate you, what's a sophmoric purple dino to do? Get out the lawyers!
I propose a Barney bonfire at the next burning man. Bring all the tapes and plush toys you can get your hands on, big props to those that actually bring big props. Perhaps we can nail that big purple beast on the cross to burn.
Dearest Barney:
It really hurts when you grow up and discover that no adult actually believes the pap you fed us as children.
Reply to this comment
Evil Barney
by bkedersha October 18, 2005 11:34 AM PDT
We all know Barney is an Evil Chinese Communist trying to brainwash America's youth!
Reply to this comment
Evil Barney
by bkedersha October 18, 2005 11:34 AM PDT
We all know Barney is an Evil Chinese Communist trying to brainwash America's youth!
Reply to this comment
This happened to me.
by Uncoveror October 18, 2005 2:14 PM PDT
I got a similar threatening letter from the same lawyer at the same agency!
http://www.uncoveror.com/editorial3.htm
Reply to this comment
I'm with the lawyers on this one....
by Earl Benser October 20, 2005 1:03 PM PDT
... social satire needs to be of better quality to warrant publication
with Barney included.
This happened to me.
by Uncoveror October 18, 2005 2:14 PM PDT
I got a similar threatening letter from the same lawyer at the same agency!
http://www.uncoveror.com/editorial3.htm
Reply to this comment
I'm with the lawyers on this one....
by Earl Benser October 20, 2005 1:03 PM PDT
... social satire needs to be of better quality to warrant publication
with Barney included.
(32 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.35%) 36.12 10,283.09
S&P 500 (0.48%) 5.28 1,098.29
NASDAQ (0.54%) 11.58 2,162.66
CNET TECH (0.45%) 7.08 1,578.66
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right