February 28, 2006 12:00 PM PST

As search advertising slows, talk of new horizons

Related Stories

Who's who of Google hires

February 27, 2006

Google puts National Archives video online

February 24, 2006
Has search-related advertising hit a ceiling?

Considering recent comments from the chief financial officers of Google and Yahoo, it's at least at chandelier height along with the search giants' eye-popping growth of recent years. But that's been no secret.

Google CFO George Reyes said Tuesday morning during an investor's conference that the search company's overall growth is slowing, and it's now largely "organic," according to CNBC. The comments sent Google's stock down more than 13 percent before rebounding slightly.

In mid-January, Yahoo CFO Sue Decker said during the company's fourth-quarter conference call that it is not competing with search rivals for growth. Instead, it's looking to "build new revenue opportunities."

What does this mean for the marquee business of Internet advertising that turned Google into a multibillion-dollar company and refilled Yahoo's coffers after the dot-com bust?

Financial analysts say two things. The first is that the search players will continue to operate a healthy business in search advertising and reap new rewards in areas of technological innovation, such as local search. The second is that there's an obvious positive: Both companies are looking to new businesses for new cash gains.

"We believe...Google will aggressively pursue other revenue streams," said Safa Rashtchy, senior research analyst at Piper Jaffray. "We don't believe there is any new or faster slowdown in Google's growth than what we have already modeled."

In a January report, Citigroup estimated revenue from U.S. search-related advertising will grow from $3.85 billion in 2004 to $9 billion by 2007, a 32 percent compounded growth rate. That rate of expansion is far from the triple-digit growth rates of recent years for Google and Yahoo. No wonder the two companies are tempering expectations, some financial analysts say.

According to Rashtchy of Piper Jaffray, Google's comments that growth rates are slowing "should be obvious given the rule of large numbers."

The overall picture for search is positive. Total U.S. Internet advertising revenue will grow from $9.6 billion in 2004 to $18.5 billion in 2007. Search advertising will comprise 48 percent of those revenues in 2007, up from 40 percent in 2004, according to Citigroup. In fact, its expansion is happening at a higher rate than display and rich-media advertising.

Where search advertising still has room to grow is, oddly enough, on the international and local fronts. Yahoo, Google and others are racing to improve opportunities for local ads on cell phones and handheld devices, while expanding rapidly into countries abroad. Yahoo and Google are also looking to brand advertising for growth.

Even Reyes was more positive than not during his comments.

"At the end of the day, growth will slow. Will it be precipitous? I doubt it...I think we have a lot of growth ahead of us; the question is at what rate."

See more CNET content tagged:
Internet search advertising, growth rate, CFO, Citigroup Inc., local search


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
I saw another article suggest that Google should go into banner ads (I've heard this sooo many times in the last 3 years).

Here's why this is terrible: Banner ads don't work. I don't mean economically. I mean, there's an ad on Businessweek that so slows things down, that I can't read an article. There have been ads on Engadget and autoblog that keep me from scrolling smoothly, ensuring that I'll never buy the product and I stop reading those blogs. AND CNN.com doesn't work at all when I'm at work, I think because their banner ads and webpages are programmed horribly. I can only view their headers, never their articles, which is why I never visit cnn.com anymore.

I just don't understand why with a pentium 4, windows xp, 500 megs ram, etc. why oh why can't I just read some text articles?

Can I see an article about this? Please?
Posted by solomonrex (112 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Don't forget about news.com
They are site with most abuse of flash ads. Once I had these little tiles that crawled all over the screen before they assembled into an ad banner. They forced me into installing flashblock -which by the way does a great job.
Posted by indrakanti (90 comments )
Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.