- Related Stories
-
Apple sounds alarm over QuickTime flaws
November 4, 2005 -
Apple plugs security hole in iTunes
May 10, 2005 -
iTunes presses play on video
May 10, 2005
A critical vulnerability, found in some versions of Apple Computer's popular iTunes, could enable attackers to remotely take over a user's computer, according to a warning issued Thursday by a security research firm.
The discovery of this flaw comes days after Apple issued its security update for iTunes 6 for Windows.
This flaw existed on the earlier version of iTunes 6 for Windows and was not addressed by the newest security update, according to a warning issued by eEye Digital Security.
After eEye mistakenly posted a note on its Web site saying the iTunes flaw affected "all operating systems," the security firm updated its warning to indicate that the flaw had been found only on the Windows operating system so far.
However, eEye is now testing whether the flaw also affects iTunes running on Mac operating systems.
Apple iTunes 6 for Windows, as well as the previous version, are affected by the flaw, said Steve Manzuik, product manager at eEye.
The flaw enables malicious hackers to launch arbitrary code remotely, once a user clicks on a malicious Web site link or opens a malicious e-mail, Manzuik said.
"iTunes is widespread, so there is a large exploit base," Manzuik said, noting that no exploit code has been published to date.
When Apple released its iTunes 6 for Windows security patch earlier this week, it was designed to prevent the wrong helper application from launching.
The helper program searches multiple system paths to figure out which program to run, but the flaw could allow an attacker to create a way for an alternate program to be initiated by iTunes.
An Apple representative was not available for comment, but the company has a policy of not discussing or confirming security issues until it has conducted an investigation and issued any needed patches, according a posting on its Web site.
eEye says it does not provide extensive details on security flaws until a vendor has released a patch to resolve the flaw.
See more CNET content tagged:
eEye Digital Security,
security flaw,
flaw,
Apple iTunes,
Apple Computer





products is as big a fool as you obviously are. We're all
consumers folks, not clan members. We do not owe allegiance to
anyone.
A better response to this issue would be to ask how one actually
exploit the flaw if it is a remotely executable one and the only
remote thing that itunes accesses is the itunes music store? The
only other thing I can think of is the music library sharing
feature which we can all turn off if that's the only other way of
accessing iTunes remotely.
Being merely an educated user and not a Mac genius is there
anyone out there who knows any better?
harmful and addictive.
This firm sells security software. Would be surprised to learn that
they announce that they have found a security flaw? Not me.
problem is to buy their product.
Not proof of exaggeration but reason enough I think for doubting
their intentions.
What version(s) of iTunes does this impact? Have there been any real world reports of security breaches? How exactly are hackers supposed to get into my iTunes to begin with? Some salient details and facts would go a long way to supporting what is at present a somewhat dubious article.
Does this mean - GULP - OS X isn't perfect, after all ?
Havin read the report, it's in the Initial stage. So it'll be interesting to see how this develops.
"Description: A remotely exploitable flaw exists that allows arbitrary code to be executed in the context of the logged in user." - doesn't sound trivial (expecially if the arbitraty code was like "FORMAT C:").
Not yet. Look at original advisory:
Operating Systems Affected:
All Microsoft Operatins Systems.
systems (Mac and Windows)
However, the link to eEye (for the November 17, 2005 iTunes
vulnerability report EEYEB-20051117b) states:
"Operating Systems Affected:
All Microsoft Operatins (sic) Systems"
Now where do you see OS X in that statement?
- test
-
by sabot96
November 19, 2005 9:54 AM PST
- test
-
Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)