Version: 2008

April 13, 2006 4:17 PM PDT

Aperture 1.1 renders new features and price

  • 2 comments
Related Stories

Adobe program rivals Apple's Aperture

January 9, 2006
Apple Computer is offering a better price, along with updated features in its newest version of Aperture.

The professional image software for RAW-format workflow, which was previously $499, is now $299.

This is not the first time Apple has readjusted pricing for Aperture. In January, Apple decided to waive the $49 "crossgrade" fee for Intel-based Mac owners who needed a universal version of Aperture in order for it to run on their machines.

Licensed Aperture 1.0 owners can upgrade for free from the Aperture update Web site. Mac OS X "Tiger" and Aperture 1.0.1 are required in order to install the 1.1 release.

As part of the 1.1 release, Apple is also offering Apple store e-coupons to licensed Aperture owners: $200 for Aperture 1.0/1.01 and $100 for Aperture 1.0 Academic.

Aperture 1.1, according to Apple, includes improvements to rendering speed and output quality.

A new color meter tool allows sampling of pixel values in RGB, Lab or CMYK in the HUD display and loupe magnifying viewer. Photographers can also control the noise reduction, tone curve and sharpening applied when converting a RAW image. Specific RAW adjustment settings can also be saved as a customizable tool for use on other photos.

Aperture 1.1 allows photographers to specify resolution in dpi when exporting images to PhotoShop. Apple also claims that it has improved the handling and output of layered PhotoShop images.

Support for Canon EOS 30D and Nikon D200 RAW files has also been added.

Adobe Lightroom, Aperture's chief competitor, offers a free beta version of its software in exchange for user feedback.

See more CNET content tagged:
Apple Computer, Adobe PhotoShop, owner

Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Why?
by Andrew J Glina April 16, 2006 2:35 AM PDT
Please, some one answer this question. Why is Tiger required? Apple pulled this same trick with the Mighty mouse and I can't see any reason why they need to do it. It seems like a forced upgrade to me.
Reply to this comment
Why?
by Andrew J Glina April 16, 2006 2:35 AM PDT
Please, some one answer this question. Why is Tiger required? Apple pulled this same trick with the Mighty mouse and I can't see any reason why they need to do it. It seems like a forced upgrade to me.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Adobe Systems (0.00%) 0.00 36.78
Apple (0.00%) 0.00 210.73
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 10,428.05
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,115.10
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 2,269.15
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,646.41
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right