March 20, 2006 7:38 PM PST
Advocacy group shames adware advertisers
- Related Stories
-
Advertisers may face public humiliation over adware
February 9, 2006 -
Feds stay strong on spyware case
February 9, 2006 -
180solutions drops suit against Zone Labs
January 30, 2006 -
Feds asked to take action against adware maker
January 23, 2006 -
Adware maker: We were victims of cybergang
November 3, 2005 -
Adware maker seeks to thwart rogue installs
September 7, 2005
Advertising money is what keeps the makers of adware in business, and advertisers should be more scrupulous, the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based public advocacy group, said Monday. Adware is software that pops up ads, can slow down PCs and often creeps onto computers without user knowledge.
"Knowingly or not, these companies are fueling the spread of unwanted programs that clog people's computers, threaten privacy and tarnish the Internet experience for millions," said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the group. "Our goal is to eventually cut the funding for adware off at the source."
While recognizing that ads might pass through several third parties, such as ad agencies and affiliate networks, the CDT on Monday published names of more than a dozen companies that it found advertised through adware. These include well-known names such as Club Med, eHarmony.com, Netflix, NetZero and PeoplePC.
"We're urging advertisers to be more vigilant to ensure that they aren't unwittingly bankrolling one of the Internet's fastest-growing problems," Schwartz said.
The public shaming of advertisers by the CDT follows the suggestion last month by Jon Leibowitz, a commissioner of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, of public humiliation as punishment for companies that use adware to promote their wares.
The CDT sent letters to the chief executives of 18 companies whose ads appeared on adware from 180solutions, one of the largest makers of Internet advertising software. The CDT in January filed a complaint with the FTC, charging 180solutions with engaging in unfair and deceptive business practices.
The CDT asked the companies if they had a policy regarding advertising through adware. The names of those that did not respond to the inquiry were published Monday. The other companies on the list are: matchmakers True.com, PerfectMatch.com and LetsTalk.com; uBid; ProFlowers; GreetingCards.com; Altrec and Waterfront Media.
Of the companies listed by CDT, only Netflix, cell phone Web site LetsTalk.com and Altrec, an online vendor of outdoor wear, responded to a request for comment from CNET News.com.
Netflix "strictly forbids" advertising via adware or spyware, spokesman Steve Swasey said Tuesday. "When it happens, it is placed there without our knowledge or approval. And Netflix cracks down very hard when we find it," he said.
Netflix, an online DVD rental store, actively monitors where its ads appear, but has been unable to fully control all the third parties that place its ads, Swasey said. "This is an industry problem," he said. "It is a new and evolving technology, and it is very complex."
Both LetsTalk and Altrex acknowledged advertising through 180solutions adware.
"We've made the decision to no longer work with 180solutions," Delly Tamer, founder and CEO of LetsTalk, said in an e-mailed statement Tuesday. The company is cutting back all of its marketing via applications such as adware, Tamer said.
Altrec CEO Mike Morford said his company has a negligible relationship with 180solutions. "Altrec has in the first quarter of 2006 spent a total of $440 with 180solutions," he said in a telephone interview on Monday. Morford could not say if Altrec would continue advertising through adware or if his company has a policy against that.
180solutions rebuked the notion that its software is unwanted by consumers. The company has worked to make its software visible to users and to display alerts when it's installed, 180solutions CEO Keith Smith said in a statement. "Yet despite all of this, some retain the uninformed notion that our users are duped into installing our software," he said.
The CDT will continue its efforts against adware and its more nefarious cousin spyware, Schwartz said. The group is talking to FTC commissioners about its report next week and also plans to share the information with state attorneys general, he said.
See more CNET content tagged:
180Solutions, adware, Ari Schwartz, advertiser, NetFlix Inc.
6 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
It would starve them off ! After all, ad/spywares are significantly impacting their customer's online experience, not to mention the cost in customer support.
Sure, if someone wants spywares, being keylogged, flashy ads all over the place and blue screens, he should have the ability to disable the function.
they look the other way since they make money off of it.
It would starve them off ! After all, ad/spywares are significantly impacting their customer's online experience, not to mention the cost in customer support.
Sure, if someone wants spywares, being keylogged, flashy ads all over the place and blue screens, he should have the ability to disable the function.
As for ISP, blocking is a tricky thing. I get zero spam. Absolutely none. How? I run my own mail server and block all IPs from Europe and Asia. Can an ISP do that? Only if they have no clients that do business in Europe and Asia.
The fact is blocking has false positives and only works when focused on the individual.
Ok, then how much did you spend last year?
To myself, $440 is a relationship as adware stuff like this is cheap. At a penny (or less)per page view, that would mean 44,000 people had to suffer. And that would just be "First Quarter 2006" and just your company alone. So, answer this: What is your cost to profit ratio on these ads?
I guess ethics really has no place in business, unless you are using as a cop out reason to fire someone who has them.