Twitter has decided to appeal a recent ruling in the legal battle between the social network and New York State over the tweet records of an Occupy Wall Street protester. According to All Things D, Twitter announced today that it's not giving up protecting the rights of its users.
The melee began in May when New York County Criminal Court Judge Matthew Sciarrino Jr. subpoenaed Twitter to hand over three months of basic user information and tweets from one of its users, Malcolm Harris. Harris is currently being prosecuted for disorderly conduct at an Occupy Wall Street protest on the Brooklyn Bridge last October where more than 700 other alleged protesters were arrested.
Twitter's terms of service state that its users "retain [their] rights to any content [they] submit, post, or display on or through" the site. And the social network has maintained this stance throughout these legal proceedings. In May, Twitter's legal counsel Ben Lee said, "Our filing with the court reaffirms our steadfast commitment to defending those rights for our users."
- Twitter paid $36 million for IBM patents to avoid a lawsuit
- Twitter prohibits posting of sexually explicit videos on Vine
- Stealthy startup Clinkle nabs another big name: Twitter's ex chief designer
- DeGeneres' Oscar tweet leads to $3M Samsung donation
- Twitter error blamed for mass user password reset
But to no avail, Judge Sciarrino still ruled that Twitter must hand over Harris' data. In an opinion he wrote earlier this month, the judge said that Twitter users have no reasonable expectation of privacy because tweets are public.
Now, as the battle continues, Twitter is not surrendering. "We're appealing the Harris decision," Lee wrote in a tweet today. "It doesn't strike the right balance between the rights of users and the interests of law enforcement."