April 21, 2004 6:40 PM PDT
Microsoft commentary slams EU ruling
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft holds out antitrust olive branch
April 21, 2004 -
EU slaps record fine on Microsoft
March 24, 2004
The seven-page paper, posted late Wednesday on Microsoft's Web site, is a cross between a treatise and a legal brief, citing both the potential damage of the ruling and the alleged legal shortcomings of the decision.
"The commission is seeking to make new law that will have an adverse impact on intellectual property rights and the ability of dominant firms to innovate," Microsoft said in the paper. "This adverse impact will not be confined to the software industry or to Europe."
The release of the paper comes just as the European Union is preparing to issue the full 300-page text of its ruling against Microsoft. The software maker has already seen the report, which is expected to be made public Thursday.
Earlier on Wednesday, Microsoft told a U.S. judge that the company is willing to extend its existing program for licensing Windows communication protocols to rivals--a move one observer said was aimed primarily at bolstering its case in Europe.
Last month, the European Union imposed a record $613 million fine on Microsoft. It also ordered the company to share more of its technology with competitors and ship a version of its Windows operating system without a media player. The text set for release Thursday is expected to go into more detail on the mechanics of the ruling and how European regulators reached their decision.
In its detailed response to the EU action on Wednesday, Microsoft tried to cast the ruling as one that will stifle creativity at Microsoft and beyond.
"We live in a world in which most products result from combining a variety of individual components. Indeed, product innovation results in no small measure from such integration," Microsoft said. "The decision opens the door to intrusive regulation of product design--not to mention a record fine--based on a complaint by a single component supplier, even when this integration is the market norm and other suppliers continue to grow. Such a result, if allowed to stand, would almost certainly spell bad news for the European and global economies."
7 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
they say innovation will be limited, but I think security will
increase. They have to think things through before integrating
(bundling) new features into the OS. Others don't bundle but yet
things work well together. The point is that locking out or
making other products less compatible is the EU's point. Why
does the US government get involved, because they recieve lots
of $$ from MS during campaigns. This is election year, also lots
of tech jobs ahve disappeared, so this is a political point for the
election. Let's get over it and think what really is best for the
industry. Security not another feature that will make MS or just
the PC makers more money, but make the average user (office or
home) more safe as well as more productive. I want a PC that
lets me decide what I what I want and don't want. Freedom of
choice is the true American way and dream. Obvious MS doesn't
believe in it even though the promote it.
Can you, or can you not, buy on a cd, or download whatever the hell you want and load it on your machine? Yes.
So when I buy my next BMW, since it's parts are made by BMW, that stifles the BMW aftermarket suppliers and should sue BMW? EU should shut the hell up, and quit listening to inferior producers of product.
It is very simple really, if you don't like Windows, buy a Mac, buy the Flavor of the month of Linux, buy a SGI, buy a Sun box, but for god sake, quit your whining.
The EU is not going to prohibit the sale of
Windows or any other Microsoft product. All of
this is due to one or two software developers that
want to take advantage of MS. The EU is like the
UN - Useless!