• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
March 18, 2009 9:25 PM PDT

Work begins on iPhone OS 3.0 jailbreak

by Jennifer Guevin
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 21 comments

A clarification was made to this story.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET)

The iPhone Dev-Team says the upcoming iPhone OS 3.0 can be jailbroken but issued a warning to some 3G users eager to get that shiny new copy-paste feature.

Apple unveiled on Tuesday some of what it says will be 100 new features coming to the iPhone and iPod Touch with the new version of the mobile operating system. A beta version was made available immediately to everyone in the iPhone Developer Program, and it didn't take long for developers to get cracking on iPhone OS 3.0.

The Dev-Team confirmed that the new version is "jailbreakable" on all devices in a blog posted Tuesday. But they said people who've already unlocked their 3G devices with Yellowsn0w will run into trouble if they download the 3.0 beta.

This is because Yellowsn0w jailbreak capitalizes on the device's baseband radio, which is used to link up the device with the network and which will be changed by the iPhone 3.0 update, according to InfoWorld's Ian Paul. The Dev-Team warns that upgrading to 3.0 with Yellowsn0w installed will cause people to lose Yellowsn0w and will be unable to get it back.

Needless to say, the Dev-Team weren't the only people tinkering around with the iPhone beta. One developer (via MacRumors) was able to activate the iPhone's tethering feature via a USB cable. Apple announced on Tuesday that it had built in the capability to tether an iPhone to a laptop via Bluetooth. But the company said it's up to individual carriers whether they want to make it available on their networks and that the feature wouldn't be widely available until that happened.

Clarification at 10:43 p.m. PDT: When it was published, this story implied that Yellowsn0w is jailbreaking software. It is used for unlocking jailbroken phones.

Jennifer Guevin is assistant managing editor of CNET News. She focuses on science and green tech. But she also makes the occasional contribution to CNET's kitchen gadgets blog or writes about the latest Web distraction. Once a week, she takes the mic as host of CNET's Daily News Podcast. E-mail Jennifer.
Recent posts from Apple
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
Report: Apple accused of NAND price manipulation
What if: Apple Newton vs. Apple iPhone
Apple App Store collector's items: 10 rarities
iPhone officially lands in South Korea
Apple sues power adapter knockoff maker
Apple's 2009 Black Friday deals: All MacBook Pro models $101 off
Apple to Psystar: And don't get any bright ideas about a Black Friday sale, either
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Hep Cat March 18, 2009 10:41 PM PDT
I'm here to remind people that the two-year agreement between Apple and ATT expires this summer on the anniversary of the original iPhone intro.

It's open season for GSM carriers. Who can offer the cheapest data rates? Who will give customers the best extras?

Funny how C|Net always misses the long view. Maybe that's a consequence of trying to sensationalize every single headline.
Reply to this comment
by UserNameIsAleadyInUse March 18, 2009 11:26 PM PDT
The title is "Work begins on iPhone OS 3.0 jailbreak." It looks like it stuck to the topic pretty well, to me.
by sting7k March 19, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
By 2 year you mean 5 year? Tmobile has 3G in like 4 cities and worse EDGE coverage than AT&T, I wouldn't exactly be jumping for joy.
by jtara March 18, 2009 11:32 PM PDT
Maybe not just GSM carriers.

I received an email from Verizon asking me to complete a survey. I completed the survey, and it was pretty clear that it was intended for customers who'd left for ATT. Of course, the survey asked what carrier you'd switched to, but I don't think they have much interest in switches to any other carrier. So, once I selected ATT it asked for the reason for the switch. It was free-text - a huge box that you could type a few paragraphs in. But they specified that you be "succinct". I answered "iPhone".

The survey then asked if the iPhone was the only reason why I switched.

Well, what other answer did they expect? They had to pay somebody to do a survey for this?
Reply to this comment
by sting7k March 19, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
That survey has been going out for months, nothing new.
by Jeff.Smith March 19, 2009 1:00 AM PDT
I currently have a jailbroken iPhone that allows me to do all of the things that the 3.0 software will allow me to do plus some. But the features that Apple are making standard are probably a little bit better than their jailbroken counterparts so I will make the jump to the 3.0 software when it is released this summer. This being said I will probably still jailbreak with Quickpwn so that I can still retain some of the features apple doesn't allow, such as video support, customizable themes, and the ability to put things into folders, plus I like to stick it to the man. So, SUCK IT APPLE!

Phew, not that I got that out of the way, this software upgrade does take away a large part of the need to jailbreak to get rudimentary smartphone features such as MMS, Copy/Paste, and Landscape Messaging, so kudos to apple. If they would have added in customizable themes and video recording I wouldn't even need to jailbreak at all, but alas it is apple that we are talking about here.
Reply to this comment
by chris-craft March 19, 2009 5:23 AM PDT
I have a contract with AT&T so I don't need to unlock my Iphone, I have jailbroken it. But I am being careful to retain the option to unlock because I hope this summer there is a new and improved phone and mine will be worth MUCH more on Ebay if it is unlocked!
Reply to this comment
by mrcockrell March 19, 2009 6:37 AM PDT
i thought it was a 5 year contract with at&t did they change it to 2? i was never clear on that

there is little doubt they will make CDMA compatable iPhones immediately once the contract is up, its likely they would just start to make all new iPhones CDMA/GSM hybrids, its the most logical option

who would want a CDMA only iPhone... well obviously some people who dont know any better would not mind but ...who would WANT one

plus Verizon will want it to be able to be able roam on their vodafone GSM networks abroad

im getting a little excited at the idea
Reply to this comment
by Maelstorm March 19, 2009 7:26 AM PDT
It's been 2 years all along. 2 year contracts are the standard in the cell phone industry. There's an article here that states that AT&T will be offering the iPhone with no contract, but it will cost you something like $499 or $599 though.
by codynews March 19, 2009 7:35 AM PDT
@Maelstorm: I have a contract but had my truck (with my phone in it) stolen. So I had to go buy a phone with out a contract. They charged me straight up retail price ($499). Gee thanks Apple!
by rapier1 March 19, 2009 8:50 AM PDT
@Maelstrom & Codynews,

The 2 year contract is the one you signed with AT&T. MrCockrell is asking about the exclusivity agreement that Apple signed with AT&T - this agreement means that AT&T is the only authorized carrier for the iPhone in the US for the next 3+ years.
by mrcockrell March 19, 2009 9:09 AM PDT
yep i was referring to the 5 year exclusivity contract between Apple and at&t for the iPhone... Hep Cat mentioned in the first comment that the "2 year agreement" was almost up, but i thought it was 5 years

i was seeking clarification because i was not sure

@rapier1 so are you saying it is in fact 5 years then?
by rapier1 March 19, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
It is a 5 year exclusivity deal. The question is if the exclusivity started when the deal was signed in 2005 or when it was released in 2007. I don't know about that.
by codynews March 19, 2009 7:36 AM PDT
"Quickpwn"? "Yellowsn0w "?

Excuse me if I don't want to put some crap with those names on my shiny $500 toy :)
Reply to this comment
by mrcockrell March 19, 2009 9:22 AM PDT
wow have you taken it out of the box yet??

its so shiny and expensive... just be careful

hey everyone look at me! i paid alot for an iphone only to no longer have any of the common features of other much cheaper phones on the market

toys are meant to be played with ;)
by TheDigitalAlchemist March 19, 2009 4:40 PM PDT
Without Jailbreaking, that's all the iPhone is... a toy!
by ecotony March 19, 2009 12:24 PM PDT
I will be doing the jailbreak/unlock when my apple care/ 2 year contract ends at Christmas. My 1st gen iPhone will move to my other account at Tmobile..... Looks like EDGE is only $6/mo more on Tmobile.

I have no love for AT&T and think their rates are crazy. I'll be happy to be rid of their spy enabling ways.

Do love my phone though.
Reply to this comment
by Angarvin517 March 20, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
as long as i can jailbreak my iphone with 3.0, i'll be happy. All these native feature upgrades will be welcome. but like the guy before said, i love having video capture support and free tetherering, along with full visual customization. I dont think the plans are that bad on ATT either. Im on a family plan with my brothers and we spend around $ 160 for 3 of us. Not to shabby. Plus i've never really run into a bad reception area yet.
Reply to this comment
by the_first_geekgrrl March 20, 2009 10:16 AM PDT
quote CNET: The Dev-Team warns that upgrading to 3.0 with Yellowsn0w installed will cause people to lose Yellowsn0w and will be unable to get it back.

No, if you install 3.0 (and you are not an Apple approved developer having a UID number) you will lose the baseband and will be unable to get it back, so wait for the Dev-Team announcement.

This is for everyone, not just people who have yellowsnow.

If you do not have an Apple Developer ID number, wait a little. Read the forums.

There is good 3.0 beta-feedback in the forums, so do a search.
Reply to this comment
by richto March 21, 2009 5:04 AM PDT
I doubt they will bother with a CDMA version. That's a legacy technology only used in places like the USA that lag behind the curve on mobile technology. Most of the world uses GSM and its 3G derivatives.

Unfortunately the USA has a history of choosing inferior proprietary technology as the US political system is based on legal bribes. The companies that bribe the most politicians with the most money (commonly known as 'contributions') win.

For instance, while much of the rest of the world is enjoying DAB digital radio and is moving to DAB+, the US has as usual chosen a proprietary and inferior solution, 'IBOC'.
Reply to this comment
by the_first_geekgrrl March 21, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
Here is my clarification:

CNET has made the announcement appear to be only for people who have yellowsnow.

In fact,

The warning not to install the 3.0 beta should be for all, not just people who have yellowsnow.

Because if you install 3.0 beta (and you are not an Apple approved developer having a UID number) and you choose to do a restore to the previous firmware, you will lose the baseband and will be unable to get it back.

So,

1. If you have yellowsnow, wait for the Dev-Team.

2. Even if you don't have yellowsnow, if you do not have an Apple Developer ID and you apply the 3.0 beta, and then, choose to do a restore of the firmware, you will lose the baseband, which means, no phone service.

Possibly, forever.

If the baseband cannot be retored, then the iPhone is no longer a phone.


So, do not try this at home.

Wait.


note: I am disabled for reading and for writing. I have to use assisted technology.

What is your excuse for not reading, before writing?

You are a professional, and you get paid.

And no, I am not going to "google" and search the developers participating in the forums or the fans forums for you.

Read and Search before you make announcements.
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right