Windows 7 beta: First impressions
Windows 7 could be one of Microsoft's greatest operating systems, if it fulfills the promise shown by the unofficial beta version (build 7000) we have been testing for the past couple of days.
Let me preface these quick impressions of Redmond's latest opus by saying that I came to Windows 7 after having happily run the much-maligned Windows Vista on my Intel Core 2 Duo-based PC for the past 18 months (alongside Ubuntu).
I found Vista to be a worthy upgrade from Windows XP SP2. Despite its obvious flaws (can you say "resource hog"?) and the acknowlegement that some of its features need to be disabled by default, Vista at heart is a much more stable and usable operating system than XP, which was first released in 2001.
The release of Service Pack 1 and gradual driver improvements have built on Microsoft's somewhat-shaky Vista beginning.
Coming from this background, I have been pleased to discover over the past several days that Microsoft appears to have built on Vista's strengths and addressed most of its weaknesses with the beta release of Windows 7.
I found the Windows 7 beta a painless install. Out-of-the-box driver support on our test machine was perfect, and it took only half an hour and two quick reboots to begin running a stable desktop environment, though we wondered why Windows 7 created a 200MB partition in addition to its main partition. The 33MB of updates quickly came down the pipe upon loading the desktop.
Basic desktop performance was strong; the reports that Windows 7 is simply faster than Vista appear to be true. Certainly, Windows 7 had no problem simultaneously installing and launching applications, downloading files, browsing the Web, and carrying out other tasks on our modest 2.8GHz Pentium 4, which has only an 80GB IDE hard disk and 512MB of RAM.
Vista's most visible annoyance, User Account Control, has been pared right back on its default setting, and we encountered it only a couple of times throughout a whole morning of installing applications. However, if you feel nostalgic for UAC's old behavior, you can easily change it back via Windows 7's new Action Center, which now centralizes all of the security updates and warning alerts that Windows throws your way.
Windows 7 recommended that we install a third-party antivirus package (it suggested Kaspersky and AVG), but its antispyware package Defender comes preinstalled. Microsoft appears to have an antivirus package installed under the hood; when downloading new software with Firefox, we were told that our downloads were being scanned for viruses.
I particularly like the new photo-realistic device icons, and the overhaul of the way Windows handles and ejects USB storage devices. Microsoft appears to have wiped out a lot of the Windows XP-era interface quirks of Vista; the result is a much more simplistic, unified experience for common tasks.
I also enjoyed the overhaul of the Windows taskbar, especially the slick graphics, but a bug prevented us from being able to use the preview function (it showed a black rectangle instead), and you'll want to play with the taskbar settings to get this piece of the Windows 7 puzzle just right. It's easy to get minimized windows mixed up with launcher buttons, for example.
I want to stress that we didn't test the Windows 7 beta exhaustively, and business users will need to closely examine deployment software and how the operating system integrates into their existing environments, as well as its ability to work well with third-party software. For example, we couldn't get Adobe Systems' Creative Suite 3 to install on Windows 7 beta; the installer told us we needed to quit Internet Explorer first.
But perhaps the most important thing to note about the software is that at first glance, it has much more of that nebulous "Windows XP feel" than Vista ever did. Even on our modest machine, Windows 7 didn't thrash the hard disk or ever feel unresponsive, except when we were installing Apple's iTunes, a notorious pain on Windows systems.
In general, this signals that Microsoft has spent a lot of effort with Windows 7 on delivering a solid operating system that won't "wow" anyone but will satisfy them on a much deeper level. In other words, just what the doctor--and the customers--ordered.
You can find a lot of further Windows 7 analysis on the ZDNet.com blog of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes, as well as our own photo gallery here.
Renai LeMay of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.








- by Maclover1 January 7, 2009 8:28 AM PST
- Major Pro MS BIAS IMHO. A few examples....<br /><br />"Vista at heart is a much more stable and usable operating system than XP, which was first released in 2001."<br /><br />Really I never had a problem with XP. I found it ROCK SOLID if you it was setup right. Still is today. I cant even remember the last time XP hung or BS or I had to power it down to get it to respond. Same goes for Vista its rock solid to be honest. At first it had some serious pauses for no reason at making me think it was hung but then it would come back alive. More usable???? So is Vista more usable when you try to run an application you own, that works fine on XP, has a problem running on Vista? Is Vista more usable with UAC or more cumbersome? The point you were trying to make is XP is dead please move on to the new Windows...basically promoting Vista/7.<br /><br />When I read this I almost spit coffee on my screen...<br /><br />"Basic desktop performance was strong; the reports that Windows 7 is simply faster than Vista appear to be true. Certainly, Windows 7 had no problem simultaneously installing and launching applications, downloading files, browsing the Web, and carrying out other tasks on our modest 2.8GHz Pentium 4, which has only an 80GB IDE hard disk and 512MB of RAM."<br /><br />512MB of RAM, yeah a pure joy I am sure. Any one that has ever installed an OS knows one thing for sure. Its super fast after the initial OS load, once the lastes drivers are installed. Its quick, it boots up fast, shuts down fast etc. Then you load apps, use files, temp files are created and the hard drive gets fragged....the OS slows down. I think you forgot this, and sure a clean install of Windows 7 was faster on a system with 512megs of RAM that had Vista on it for months?<br /><br />I agree with you here...<br /><br />"Microsoft appears to have wiped out a lot of the Windows XP-era interface quirks of Vista; the result is a much more simplistic, unified experience for common tasks. "<br /><br />You could tell Vista was not done. You would have nice new shiny dialog boxes and animations in most places followed up with stuff from XP???? Did not have time to finish it. So I guess Windows 7 is Vista finished in so many ways? <br /><br />So for all those that purchased Vista, MS would like to thank you for paying for their beta test. Now please give us more money for the finished product.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by LuvThatCO2 January 7, 2009 10:12 AM PST
- "At first it had some serious pauses for no reason at making me think it was hung but then it would come back alive. More usable???? "
<br />
<br />I had this exact problem with a Dell running Vista. Until I installed the proper motherboard drivers. Has run perfectly since.
<br />
<br />I find that 90% of what people consider 'Vista' problems are really driver problems, usually video drivers. A lot of it is also the crapware that gets pre-installed. Vista itself, if you install it properly onto a blank drive using only the MS supplied Vista DVD (and no crapware) is a very smooth, stable OS.
- Like this
-
- by BigGuns149 January 7, 2009 11:43 AM PST
- The sad fact is that you are right. Plain vanilla original MS supplied Vista with the proper drivers sans any other baggage tends to run well on the vast majority of new hardware. Heck, it takes LESS time to install Vista than XP on most computers.
- Like this
-
- by Sabroson January 10, 2009 6:42 PM PST
- Windows XP is still the Windows OS of choice. Nor Vista, or a beta of Windows 7 will change that. Once Windows 7 is released (in 2010?) we will see if the story changes.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 7 pages (306 Comments)