• On mySimon: Three Colors Trilogy
May 5, 2009 2:03 PM PDT

What's not to like about Windows 7?

by Larry Magid
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 35 comments

If you're feeling adventuresome, you can get a jump on the rest of the world by being one of the first to try out Windows 7, the next version of Windows. I've tested out the beta version for the last few months and, so far, my experience has been quite positive.

Microsoft still hasn't announced the date of the final commercial version of the upcoming operating system, though it's widely expected to be out by the end of this year. But Microsoft is allowing anyone to download and install a free copy of the operating system so it can be tested on a wide range of machines. Windows 7 RC, as it's called, was made available for public testing May 4threlease candidate and will be available for free "at least through July" to those willing to go through a few hurdles.

Getting set up
Microsoft is recommending that you install Windows 7 on a dedicated test PC, admonishing users not to test it on your primary home or business PC. I have a confession. I ignored that advice and tested the first beta and the release candidate on the machine I mainly use for work. Having said that, I'm a very experienced PC user, I back up my data daily, and I have other machines I can rely on if there is a problem. Installing any new operating system--especially one that's not officially released or supported--can be risky, so if you do install Windows 7, be sure you have a complete backup of your system; back up your data regularly and have a plan of action should something fail.

First you have to download a 2.36-gigabyte file, which could take a considerable amount of time depending on your Internet speed and how busy the download servers are at the time. What you download is an ISO file that must be burned to a DVD before you can install it on a machine, so be sure your PC has a DVD burner and you have a blank DVD handy. Microsoft says your machine will need a 1 GHz or faster CPU, at least 1 GB of RAM (I recommended at least 2 GB), and at least 16 GB of available disk space (more is better). The 64-bit version has higher requirements.

You can install Windows 7 over Vista but not earlier versions of Windows. For best performance, I recommend a "clean install," which requires that you re-install all your software when you're done. In theory this can be done without destroying the data on your disk, but I would never dream of installing an operating system without first backing up all of my data.

The installation process went very smoothly for me and, when it was done, most of my hardware worked properly thanks to Windows 7's built-in drivers. Most simply installed automatically. I had to manually install my printer drivers, but even they were included with the operating system. It discovered my Brother laser printer on my network and installed it without my having to download any new drivers. It also recognized my keyboard and dual monitors. The built-in Windows driver for the IDT sound adapter on my Intel motherboard installed basic features but didn't give me as much control over settings as Intel's drivers. However, I was able to download and install them from Intel's Web site.

So far, all of the programs I've tested work. There were a few that gave me a bit of trouble at first but right-clicking on a program's icon brings up the Windows 7 "troubleshoot compatibility" tool that usually takes care of things. The one big problem I had was installing the plug-in to watch videos on ABC.com. Before it would let me download the software, it kept telling me that I had to upgrade my operating system to XP or Vista. It saw that I wasn't using an approved operating system and refused to let me try. But I solved that problem by downloading it to another (Vista) PC and copying the file over to my Windows 7 machine where it installed just fine.

Hovering over IE shows all tabs

(Credit: Microsoft)

First impressions
My favorite feature in Windows 7 is the taskbar, which not only displays running programs but lets you "pin" frequently used programs so you can run or switch to them with a single click. When you hover your mouse over an icon of a program that's running, you see thumbnails of all the open windows for that program. If you move the mouse into the thumbnail, it grows much larger. Click on that larger window and you're in the program. This feature makes it a lot easier to navigate between documents or Web sites. With Firefox, you only see one tab per window, but Internet Explorer shows all the tabs, which is quite nice. In fact, that feature caused me to start using Internet Explorer 8 (which comes with Windows 7) and I'm starting to like it a lot more. I read the reviews that say Firefox 3 is faster than Explorer 8, but with my cable modem connection I don't see any noticeable difference, and Internet Explorer seems to be a less prone to crashes.

I'm also liking the Libraries feature that you can access from the navigation pane in any folder. Libraries are virtual folders that, by default, provide access to documents, photos, and other media files without having to navigate through a hierarchy of folders. You can use this to add links to additional folders on your machine, a network server, or another machine on the network. For instructions on how to use libraries, see this post on Windows Live.

Although an improvement over previous versions, it still retains some of Windows' annoying attributes. For one thing, it will slow down over time. My brand new RC installation is quite fast but by the time I used the beta for a few months, it was starting to get a bit sluggish (that's called "windows rot"). That's been the case with every version of Windows so far, and Windows 7 doesn't seem to be an exception. Still, it's noticeably faster than Vista which is at least a step in the right direction. Also, as with earlier versions, it sometimes doesn't properly close programs that have crashed. There have been times when I've had to turn off the PC to recover from a program's crash.

For a lot more details on Windows see Ed Bott's excellent write-up on ZDNet.

Larry Magid is a technology journalist and an Internet safety advocate. He's been writing and speaking about Internet safety since he wrote Internet safety guide "Child Safety on the Information Highway" in 1994. He is co-director of ConnectSafely.org, founder of SafeKids.com and SafeTeens.com, and a board member of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Larry's technology analysis and commentary can be heard on CBS News and CBS affiliates, and read on CBSNews.com. He also writes a personal-tech column for the San Jose Mercury News. You can e-mail Larry or follow him on Twitter @larrymagid.
Recent posts from Safe and Secure
Facebook and MySpace delete NY sex offenders
Tips for safe online shopping
McAfee warns about '12 Scams of Christmas'
Google lets parents lock in SafeSearch
A child porn-planting virus: Threat or bad defense?
Net safety conference to call for digital citizenship
TrendMicro to 'protect the cloud'
Avoid being a victim of an e-mail phishing scam
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lance1579 May 5, 2009 2:32 PM PDT
whats going on?
Reply to this comment
by agriffith96 May 5, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
To bad I don't have a dedicated test PC. Perhaps someone could recomend a very inexpensive machine or barebones kit for a Windows 7 test PC?
Reply to this comment
by RollyK May 5, 2009 3:45 PM PDT
If, Microsoft would follow the examples set by the Open Source community they, or it, would have created a "run-time"
disk. Knoppix. one of the best examples , allows the user to create a disk that lets the user to start and run Linux Knoppix
on almost any PC architecture. very useful for checking the integrity of the hardware.
Not doing so is a major flaw.
by timber2005 May 5, 2009 4:53 PM PDT
@RollyK
The point though (as seen by the disabiling up upgrading from B1 --> RC) is to test the installation and upgrade systems. Running a live copy is great for final release and trials (except can't install drivers very well) but for an RC needing it's install systems tested, not a good idea.
by gp2792 May 5, 2009 5:30 PM PDT
@RollyK

You can install Windows 7 into a VHD and boot to VHD as well...that means no partitionfor a new os at all. during the regular install choose custom (advanced), then press Shift F10 to pull up a command prompt. You can then create the virtual disk file, mount it and see it as a new drive in the W7 installation. In reality it is just a file on your c: drive with a vhd extension that you set the size of (20gb for example). Installation continues to this vhd file. Once done, you can run windows 7 on virtual pc within vista or xp, or you can even boot to the vhd making it seem like a totally fresh install to disk.
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 7:14 AM PDT
Wow, gp - I just stick in the Ubuntu disc and boot off of it. Never touches the hard disk unless I want it to. So much for Linux being more technically challenging to use... blecch.
by cwlqwp May 5, 2009 2:56 PM PDT
mmm... windows rot.
I guess you could call some user incompetence that if it makes you feel better. you should try to take better care of your OS if you want it to take care of you.
Reply to this comment
by elgarak May 5, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
Except that there are OSs out there that do not suffer from this rot, even when the user does not do any special maintenance. After all, the OS is there to serve ME, not the other way around. I do not want to run or maintain the OS. I don't even want to use it to run software. At the end of the day, all this software is only there to help me to make stuff that has nothing to do with the OS or the computer -- a report, thesis, presentation, video, entertain me etc.
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
...what elgarak said. I know of OSX 10.3 installs that have never required any re-install beyond the factory one, and still run just as fast even today. I personally have a computer with Red Hat 9 that has never required a re-install, still run at top speed, and it is 6 years old.
by kmomrik May 6, 2009 9:43 AM PDT
...and I have a Windows XP machine that is 7 years old that hasn't required a reformat, too. So what? It runs video games and IIS6 every day. Except for the fact that I've added a second hard-drive, upgraded the RAM from 512 to 1 GB and upgraded the video card a few times, it is the same PC that I unboxed in '02. No slower, no faster... perceptually slow (perhaps), but back back in '02... the fact that it ONLY took 1 min. to boot was fast. Now that we expect instant results... not so much.
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 12:15 PM PDT
"...and I have a Windows XP machine that is 7 years old that hasn't required a reformat, too."

...and yet as you've said, you only do a couple of limited things on it. I'm further willing to wager that you had to rig it with tools and routines that keep it clean. Most folks don't have the time or the inclination to do so.
by richmed May 9, 2009 11:16 PM PDT
Honestly...I've been testing ever Microsoft flavors for years. The only time they break is when I break it. I start testing, downloading crap and uninstalling inappropiately. But when I don't do this and only make it serve me for work related use, Microsoft is always been there with no issues. Between my -now- regular activities is to play Mediacenter on my second monitor (42 inch) watching Heroes in Netflix, while performing in my 22inch things like: running 3 VMs (Server 03, Domain Controller, SQL 2005, MOSS 2007 and Exchange 2007) for test and work related, while I browse the web, check my 4 mail accounts in MS Outlook, Rip some Blockbuster movies (you did not hear this one) and anything else I can think of, while sharing Music, Movies and Recorded TV with my son's XBOX as a Mediacenter Extender. No problems whatsoever. This is what I call Multitasking. Can you guys do the same.?? Since the BETA, I upgraded both my son's PC (HP Mediacenter 1070n) and my Quad Core Duo + Athlon XP2 on ASUS board, with 4GB on 4 500GB drives + 3 DVDRWs, to Windows 7, and hey.....no issues whatsover (either). Except for my MagicJack not being supported, everything else is running great for the last 2 months or so. In summary, I think it's all about the way you treat your car, this one will ride nice and smooth wherever you drive it. Just don't run over the bumps at high speed!!!
;-)
by mtoc May 5, 2009 3:15 PM PDT
on the other hand...I use XP on my 3 1/2 year old PC and it works very well, thank you! I dread the thought of switching to Win7 or to reinstall with system recover. too much bother. I am tired of constantly making adjustments. eventually, when I buy a new PC it will come with Win7. it may be in a long time. security updates will be supported by MS for some time. so..Win7 solves some of Vista problems but is not critical for XP users. end of speech!
Reply to this comment
by obvio-capitao May 5, 2009 3:27 PM PDT
<i>"Microsoft says that your machine will need a 1 Ghz or faster CPU, at least 1 GB of RAM (I recommended at least 2 GB) "</i>

I installed XUbuntu in a 256MB virtual machine, and it performed really well. Here's a video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z39n5Tleo0A

I strongly recommend trying Ubuntu in the same machine where you tried Windows7.

Your computer will fly.
Reply to this comment
by Wytwolf May 5, 2009 3:32 PM PDT
"My favorite feature in Windows 7 is the taskbar which not only displays running programs but lets you "pin" frequently used programs so you can run or switch to them with a single click."

Um... haven't you heard of Quick Launch? That feature has been around for awhile.
Reply to this comment
by gp2792 May 5, 2009 5:49 PM PDT
You should try win7's version...it is the evolution of quick launch.
by kevin3344 May 5, 2009 3:34 PM PDT
Microsoft finally got it right this time. Fresh from the debacle we now know as Vista, they've gone back to their roots and created a truly useful operating system. I've installed the Win7 RC in a (free) Virtual PC environment and while it doesn't give you all of the bells and whistles of a real PC, it's still pretty good.

Having said that, and as a previous poster mentioned, Windows XP is still too good to let go. It does everything I need it to do. The Pin feature in Win7 is just Quick Launch in XP, albeit without the preview. Same goes for IE 6 or IE 8, it's still a web browser. I use Firefox 3 most of the time anyway, and that's not going to change whether it's Win7 or Win8.

The question is still, does Win7 have enough for me to upgrade? Right now, the answer is no.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk May 5, 2009 3:40 PM PDT
"For one thing, it will slow down over time. My brand new RC installation is quite fast but by the time I used the beta for a few months, it was starting to get a bit sluggish (that's called "windows rot") . That's been the case with every version of Windows so far and Windows 7 doesn't seem to be an exception"

So I take it that (at least) CCleaner and jkdefrag are still required just to have any hope of keeping the OS for more than a year without a re-install, or does the slow-down occur faster now?

By comparison, all of Windows' competitors can have the same OS installation on a machine for years on end without slowly being eaten alive.

Maybe one of these days Microsoft will realize the folly of the "Registry" architecture.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 5, 2009 6:22 PM PDT
@Random_Walk

For a IT a defrag or a registry cleaning shouldn't be a issue...

The fastest defraggers can defrag a HDD in under 10 mins and registry cleaning takes like a minute.
by elgarak May 5, 2009 6:52 PM PDT
@monkeyfun4:
If it's so easy, then why does Microsoft does not build in those wonderful tools, and runs them automatically from time to time? Or makes the system so well that it can do this thing in a background? Or, gasp, gets rid of the registry so that it DOES NOT NEED to be cleaned up? Other systems can do it, why not Microsoft?
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
@monkeyfun: The point is, I have to go get those tools, and set them to run... and they're third-party tools (Windows' built-in defrag is quite frankly far too crappy to get the job done in any timely fashion, there is no Microsoft RegClean anymore, and etc).

Meanwhile, OSX has the BSD utility called 'periodic' (a form of cron job), which runs daily, weekly, and monthly - automatically. Linux has daily clean-up utilities as cron (and anacron) jobs. Neither defragment beyond a near-infinitesimal percentage (mostly thanks to better filesystem architectures). Another point: The competition OSes were built for 24/7/365 operation... Windows simply was not, and it shows.

Microsoft used to give away RegClean (but abandoned it), Windows has a defrag utility (though it's slow), and has Task Scheduler (which tends to forget things after a reboot, at least on the client OS side). It's not like Microsoft can't set something up...

...meanwhile we see ads everywhere for "Go2MyPC" which sells Joe Sixpack the tools that they can get for free, but do not have the wherewithal to find and use.
by RollyK May 5, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
It was a mistake by Microsoft to not create a "run time" disk. The Open Source community has been doing this for some time and the best example is Knoppix.
Easy download, and burn and it runs on almost any PC. The real advantage is the it allows the user to check the integrity of the hardware.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 7:12 AM PDT
Heh - you'd need a computer with 16GB of RAM in it just to run the thing if they did. ;)
by dratboy May 5, 2009 3:57 PM PDT
Meh. I'll stick to my old rule of thumb - Don't use any Microsoft product for two years from the release date - It takes them that long to work out the bugs.

On that note, My XP works great!
Reply to this comment
by JFABECS May 5, 2009 4:09 PM PDT
What is the solution to " windows rot" What is best way to clean out the "rot" I have used CCleaner on one occassion , daily scans by AVG , disk cleanup, two different spyware progs., defrag regularly and God knows what else to " keep er clean and running smoothly. Anything else?
Reply to this comment
by alexptx May 5, 2009 4:11 PM PDT
I just love to see the Microsoft bashers with all their well thought out and well founded comments. I have a Mac, run Linux as a server on multiple platforms, messed around with Linux desktops as well as use on a weekly basis XP, Vista, Windows 7 (Beta and now RC1), Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008. Vista I never really liked using nor did I recommend it to clients (oh I guess I should say my company is a Microsoft Gold Partner).

I have been using Windows 7 since the day it was released as a beta and installed RC1 over an existing Vista installation the day it was released. It is a great product and runs all my applications including 1 I thought would kill it - XPlane flight simulator. Windows 7 is a very good and stable OS and the fact it runs thousands of available applications written for XP and Vista has me recommending to my clients to test the RC1 now. Waiting 2 years is just silly. Microsoft did a great job with this desktop OS and Windows Server 2008 is also a great product.
Reply to this comment
by dratboy May 5, 2009 5:29 PM PDT
I am Microsoft Excel certified, but never in my wildest dreams could I imagine attaining gold status.
Reply to this comment
by elgarak May 5, 2009 6:57 PM PDT
For the average non-IT user, the main question remains: What does this system offer over my existing Win XP install?

It runs the same software (or an updated version) slower, needs the same amount of 3rd party security, the same amount of maintenance. It offers a nicer GUI (arguably, I thing it wastes way too much screen real estate) and some nice work flow tools that I can get for free (or for much less than I have to pay for a new Windows).

Why switch?
Reply to this comment
by Kinshuman May 5, 2009 9:05 PM PDT
Hi Larry,

I am in the Windows division in Microsoft and would like to troubleshoot the issue that you mentioned:

"Also, as with earlier versions, it sometimes doesn't properly close programs that have crashed. There have been times when I've had to turn off the PC to recover from a program's crash. "

Does this happen only with a specific application? In those cases does the application terminate when you try to terminate it via task manager?

Please feel free to contact me at kinshu@microsoft.com, I would like to make sure that your issue here is resolved.

Thanks
Reply to this comment
by kojacked May 6, 2009 2:18 AM PDT
Microsoft +1
by Random_Walk May 6, 2009 12:18 PM PDT
So, about that bit-rot that Windows normally has, and apparently still has...

Any hope of even a basic function like housekeeping tasks that run automatically?

Good to see that you stepped in to resolve the issue, but tell me - how much priority would Larry's complaints get if he were not posting this on a popular website? (I already know the answer, but I'm interested to see how you spin it :) )
by Kinshuman May 6, 2009 11:10 PM PDT
Hi Random_Walk,

In Win 7 tools just as disk defragmentor are automatically run. If you have suggestions on what inbox tools should be run we will like to get your feedback.

On the issue of priority: my team built the error reporting platform in Windows. We take customer feedback very seriously. However we need some avenue to get that feedback for scenarios where we do not get them from automated tools like Windows Error Reporting. The issue where I am helping Larry is my area of expertise. For my area of expertise I honestly do not feel that it matters to me whether the request is on a highly visible blog, a unknown blog or just email. I will positively want to help if I know about the problem. I am in the core Windows engineering division and trust me that most of my engineering colleagues in Microsoft too share the same enthusiasm when it comes to solving real customer problems.

Many times the bugs are not in the OS components that we own but in other components. In those cases we work with ISV partners to get the issues fixed in a priotized manner. Amongst my areas of expertise are application and OS behavior when critical problems happen. You do not have to be a popular blog writer to get in touch with me, just send me email (kinshu@microsoft.com).

Thanks,
Kinshuman
by Pete Steege May 6, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
In your test drive, did you see any showstoppers/roadbumbs for 5-10 TB hard drives? Given the average OS life, it will need to handle that type of capacity.

Did you play with backup?
Reply to this comment
by jkohler2 October 13, 2009 10:51 AM PDT
Larry Magid endorses Windows 7. Here is an alternative opinion:

news ? Breaking the dependency on proprietary software: A call to nonprofits to refuse Microsoft Windows 7
Breaking the dependency on proprietary software: A call to nonprofits to refuse Microsoft Windows 7

* Send this page to somebody
* Print this page

"sinking money and time into proprietary software is inconsistent with the core values of freedom and progress."

BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA -- Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 -- The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today launched the next stage of its "Windows 7 Sins" campaign at http://windows7sins.org, making the case against Microsoft and proprietary software by writing to 500 leaders of the most influential nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) worldwide, asking them to make the switch to freedom-respecting free software, and to help foster awareness of the ethical importance of computer user freedom.

The letter warns these "Windows 7 decision makers" about the "lack of privacy, freedom, and security" they will suffer should they adopt Windows 7, and makes the case that they should instead adopt free software by outlining seven major areas where proprietary software like Windows is hurting society: invading privacy, poisoning education, locking users in, abusing standards, leveraging monopolistic behavior, enforcing Digital Restrictions Management (DRM), and threatening user security.

FSF executive director Peter Brown said, "The dependency of organizations working for social change and improvement on software owned and exclusively controlled by Microsoft is leading society into an era of digital restrictions, threatening and limiting our freedoms. Free software on the other hand, is about freedom, not price, and it is designed to give you the ability to study and improve the software for your own needs. Today, we're asking leaders in the nonprofit sector to switch to the free software GNU/Linux operating system for all their desktop and computer infrastructure needs."

The GNU/Linux operating system is readily available, easy-to-use, and supported by numerous vendors and a worldwide community. GNU/Linux distributions come with thousands of freely licensed software applications, including complete accounting and fundraising solutions suitable for charities.

FSF campaigns manager Matt Lee added, "Charities, NGOs, and other nonprofit organizations that choose proprietary software are undertaking bad public policy, often through misinformation or a failure to see their technology choices as connected to their social missions. We hope to alert these decision makers to the positive contribution they can make to society by switching their organizations to free software. I hope these groups will make a public policy commitment to freedom and join a growing list of organizations who understand that sinking money and time into proprietary software is inconsistent with the core values of freedom and progress."

More information about the campaign, including the text of the letter and a mailing list that will provide subscribers with information updates and action alerts, is online at http://en.windows7sins.org.
About the Free Software Foundation

The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting computer users' right to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free (as in freedom) software -- particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants -- and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of software, and its Web sites, located at fsf.org and gnu.org, are an important source of information about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF's work can be made at http://donate.fsf.org. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.
About Free Software and Open Source

The free software movement's goal is freedom for computer users. Some, especially corporations, advocate a different viewpoint, known as "open source," which cites only practical goals such as making software powerful and reliable, focuses on development models, and avoids discussion of ethics and freedom. These two viewpoints are different at the deepest level. For more explanation, see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html.
Reply to this comment
by jkohler2 October 13, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
The Free Software Foundation urges Non-Profit organizations not to use Windows 7:
news ? Breaking the dependency on proprietary software: A call to nonprofits to refuse Microsoft Windows 7
Breaking the dependency on proprietary software: A call to nonprofits to refuse Microsoft Windows 7

* Send this page to somebody
* Print this page

"sinking money and time into proprietary software is inconsistent with the core values of freedom and progress."

BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA -- Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 -- The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today launched the next stage of its "Windows 7 Sins" campaign at http://windows7sins.org, making the case against Microsoft and proprietary software by writing to 500 leaders of the most influential nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) worldwide, asking them to make the switch to freedom-respecting free software, and to help foster awareness of the ethical importance of computer user freedom.

The letter warns these "Windows 7 decision makers" about the "lack of privacy, freedom, and security" they will suffer should they adopt Windows 7, and makes the case that they should instead adopt free software by outlining seven major areas where proprietary software like Windows is hurting society: invading privacy, poisoning education, locking users in, abusing standards, leveraging monopolistic behavior, enforcing Digital Restrictions Management (DRM), and threatening user security.

FSF executive director Peter Brown said, "The dependency of organizations working for social change and improvement on software owned and exclusively controlled by Microsoft is leading society into an era of digital restrictions, threatening and limiting our freedoms. Free software on the other hand, is about freedom, not price, and it is designed to give you the ability to study and improve the software for your own needs. Today, we're asking leaders in the nonprofit sector to switch to the free software GNU/Linux operating system for all their desktop and computer infrastructure needs."

The GNU/Linux operating system is readily available, easy-to-use, and supported by numerous vendors and a worldwide community. GNU/Linux distributions come with thousands of freely licensed software applications, including complete accounting and fundraising solutions suitable for charities.

FSF campaigns manager Matt Lee added, "Charities, NGOs, and other nonprofit organizations that choose proprietary software are undertaking bad public policy, often through misinformation or a failure to see their technology choices as connected to their social missions. We hope to alert these decision makers to the positive contribution they can make to society by switching their organizations to free software. I hope these groups will make a public policy commitment to freedom and join a growing list of organizations who understand that sinking money and time into proprietary software is inconsistent with the core values of freedom and progress."

More information about the campaign, including the text of the letter and a mailing list that will provide subscribers with information updates and action alerts, is online at http://en.windows7sins.org.
About the Free Software Foundation

The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to promoting computer users' right to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and use of free (as in freedom) software -- particularly the GNU operating system and its GNU/Linux variants -- and free documentation for free software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and political issues of freedom in the use of software, and its Web sites, located at fsf.org and gnu.org, are an important source of information about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF's work can be made at http://donate.fsf.org. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.
About Free Software and Open Source

The free software movement's goal is freedom for computer users. Some, especially corporations, advocate a different viewpoint, known as "open source," which cites only practical goals such as making software powerful and reliable, focuses on development models, and avoids discussion of ethics and freedom. These two viewpoints are different at the deepest level. For more explanation, see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html.
Reply to this comment
(35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Safe and Secure

As founder of SafeKids.com and co-director of ConnectSafely.org, Larry Magid has a special interest in Internet safety, including debunking myths like a predator behind every screen and messages like "be afraid, very afraid."

Add this feed to your online news reader

Safe and Secure topics

More on Safe and Secure
Larry's For the Record podcast
Safekids.com
Connectsafely.org
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right