Longstanding social network LiveJournal published a report Friday that asked its users what makes the site unique. Written by a Ph.D. candidate in the Media, Culture, and Communication department at New York University, the report contends that a defining characteristic of LiveJournal users is their "passion" for connecting with others. "LiveJournal's feature set encourages real, engaged, committed, long-term interaction with the site and friends met through the site, creating passionate users who care deeply about LiveJournal," the report said. Unfortunately, many of those "passionate" users seem to be moving to Facebook at a rapid rate.
News discovery service Socialmedian announced Friday that it has been acquired by XING, a business social network that has proved extremely successful in Europe. According to the company, Socialmedian's founder, Jason Goldberg, will relocate to XING's headquarters in Germany and take on the role of vice president of application platform. Socialmedian will stay a standalone service and remain under the creative control of Goldberg and his team.
Yahoo made an interesting announcement Friday, saying it has acquired a 30 percent stake in Network Management Company, an India-based telephone information service. The company did not give any reasons why it has decided to take a stake in the 411 service or if it has plans to expand it internationally to compete with Google's own 411 offering, but Network Management's CEO, T.S. Narayanaswamy, claims Yahoo's funding will create a "world class" team at the firm.
Starting Friday, GreatAmericans.com, a site that tries to inspire Americans through role models in the Armed Forces, is providing users with an opportunity to send recorded celebrity messages of thanks to loved ones serving the country in uniform. The site features messages from a number of "celebrities", including John Ondrasik, the founder of the band Five for Fighting; and Kim Cameron, lead singer of the Side FX Band. Visitors to the site can view celebrity messages, enter the name and information of their loved one, and send the thanks directly to them. The site also allows users to upload video of service men and women.
TechCrunch reported late on Friday about a hot new rumor in the social media space. The Germany-based business networking site Xing, according to TechCrunch's Michael Arrington, may be in talks to acquire online address book management company Plaxo. The deal is rumored to be in the $250 million range--a significant buy indeed.
Plaxo, for some background, was founded in 2002 by Napster co-founder Sean Parker. Since then, the company claims to have hit 15 million members (as of September 2006). It synchronizes primarily with Microsoft Outlook address books, but has also formed deals with companies like Yahoo and AOL's Instant Messenger division.
When I met with Xing founder and CEO Lars Hinrichs this spring, he made it very clear that the company believes an acquisition strategy is the best way to spread the company's influence beyond Europe and across the globe. For example, when Xing's team wanted to make inroads in Spain, it purchased regional networking site eConozco. Hinrichs also emphasized that Xing hoped to make some inroads into the U.S. market, so it's not all that surprising that news would surface concerning a potential Xing acquisition of a big stateside name in business networking.
But as we all know, here in the U.S. there's a big obstacle for Xing in the form of LinkedIn--it's virtually unrivaled in its field at the moment. As a result, any influence-spreading acquisitions on Xing's part would have to be pretty major.
So while this is a rumor, and a rather unsubstantiated one at that, it's certainly a deal that would make some sense if it were to materialize.
Here in the U.S., there's really only one big player in the sector of social networking sites geared toward professionals eager to make business connections: LinkedIn. Other business-oriented social networks have emerged, but none have shown signs of really eating into LinkedIn's stateside market share. That, however, is what Xing is trying to change.
Xing, formerly known as the less catchy OpenBC (BC stands for "Business Club") got its start in Germany and now boasts 1.69 million members. The company's moved beyond Germany largely through acquisitions and partnerships; when it expanded to Spain, it purchased a regional social network (eConozco) in order to ensure success. I met with Xing founder and CEO Lars Hinrichs earlier this week to hear about the company's impending campaign to make a splash on U.S. shores. It's an ambitious goal, since other overseas-based social networking sites have experienced real uphill climbs. On the youth front, Bebo is huge in the U.K. and it'd be an understatement to call South Korea's Cyworld a genuine phenomenon, but in the State they're still playing second fiddle to MySpace.
So the big question is, why Xing over LinkedIn? Hinrichs told me that it's all about the functionality. LinkedIn, he said, is "good for resumes." He said that Xing's simply better at helping people do business. There aren't a whole lot of features that LinkedIn doesn't offer--discussion forums, easy access to expert advice, tagging functionality on profiles, and a mobile platform--but Hinrichs claims the numbers shows that Xing's a better service. According to Comscore statistics, a Xing visit lasts an average of 66 minutes while a LinkedIn visit clocks in at only 19, and 89 percent of LinkedIn's premium members have been active in the past 30 days (which makes sense, since they're the ones forking over cash.) The site, by the way, is completely free of advertising and Xing's business model relies entirely upon revenues from the opt-in subscription accounts.
But here's the truth: better service or not, the secret to success is really in the people who use it. Xing has not yet revealed what kind of partnerships and acquisitions it's planning to leverage in order to break into the U.S. social networking market. If it plays the right cards, it could be a legitimate contender. We'll keep an eye on this one.
- prev
- 1
- next





