U.S. and Russian satellites collide
In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications satellite and a defunct Russian satellite ran into each other Tuesday above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage, officials said today. The international space station does not appear to be threatened by the debris, they said, but it's not yet clear whether it poses a risk to any other military or civilian satellites.
"They collided at an altitude of 790 kilometers (491 miles) over northern Siberia Tuesday about noon Washington time," said Nicholas Johnson, NASA's chief scientist for orbital debris at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. "The U.S. space surveillance network detected a large number of debris from both objects."
A rendering of an Iridium satellite near earth.
(Credit: Iridium Satellite)Air Force Brig. Gen. Michael Carey, deputy director of global operations with U.S. Strategic Command, the agency responsible for space surveillance, said initial radar tracking detected some 600 pieces of debris. He identified the Russian spacecraft as Cosmos 2251, a communications relay station launched in June 1993, and said the satellite is believed to have been non-operational for the past 10 years or so.
"As of about 12 hours ago, I think the head count was up (to around) 600 pieces," Carey told CBS News late today. "It's going to take about two days before we get a solid picture of what the debris fields look like. But you, I think, can imply that the majority of that should be probably along the same line as the original orbits."
He said U.S. STRATCOM routinely tracks about 18,000 objects in space, including satellites and debris, that are 3.9 inches across or larger. Tracking priority and "conjunction analysis"--identifying which objects may pose a threat to manned spacecraft--is the first priority.
"It's going to take a while" to get an accurate count of the debris fragments, Johnson said. "It's very, very difficult to discriminate all those objects when they're really close together. And so, over the next couple of days, we'll have a much better understanding."
Asked which satellite was at fault, Johnson said "they ran into each other. Nothing has the right of way up there. We don't have an air traffic controller in space. There is no universal way of knowing what's coming in your direction."
Iridium Satellite operates a constellation of some 66 satellites, along with orbital spares, to support satellite telephone operations around the world. The spacecrafts, which weigh about 1,485 pounds when fully fueled, are in orbits tilted 86.4 degrees to the equator at an altitude of about 485 miles. Ninety-five Iridium satellites were launched between 1997 and 2002 and several have failed over the years.
"Yesterday, Iridium Satellite LLC lost an operational satellite," the company said in a statement. "According to information shared with the company by various U.S. government organizations that monitor satellites and other space objects (such as debris), it appears that the satellite loss is the result of a collision with a non-operational Russian satellite.
"Although this event has minimal impact on Iridium's service, the company is taking immediate action to address the loss. The Iridium constellation is healthy, and this event is not the result of a failure on the part of Iridium or its technology. While this is an extremely unusual, very low-probability event, the Iridium constellation is uniquely designed to withstand such an event, and the company is taking the necessary steps to replace the lost satellite with one of its in-orbit spare satellites."
Johnson said the collision was unprecedented.
"Nothing to this extent (has happened before)," he said. "We've had three other accidental collisions between what we call catalog objects, but they were all much smaller than this and always a moderate sized objects and a very small object. And these are two relatively big objects. So this is a first, unfortunately."
As for the threat posed by the debris, Johnson said NASA carried out an immediate analysis to determine whether the space station faced any increased risk. The station, carrying three crew members, circles the globe at an altitude of about 220 miles in an orbit tilted 51.6 degrees to the equator.
"There are two issues: the immediate threat and a longer-term threat," he said. "It turns out, when you have a collision like this the debris is thrown very energetically both to higher orbits and to lower orbits. So there are actually debris from this event which we believe are going through the space station's altitude already. Most of it is not, most of it is still clustered up where the event took place. But a small number are going through station's altitude.
"Yesterday, we did an assessment of what the risk might be to station and we found it's going to be very, very small. As time goes on, (that) debris will (come down) some over months, most over years and decades and as the big ones come down they'll be tracked, we'll see them and the worst-case scenario, we'll just dodge them if we have to. It's the small things you can't see are the ones that can do you harm."
Asked if other satellites might be at risk, Johnson said, "Technically, yes. What we're doing now is trying to quantify that risk. That's a work in progress. It's only been 24 hours. We put first things first, which is station and preparing for the next shuttle mission."
Most, if not all, of the debris is expected to eventually burn up in Earth's atmosphere.
Bill Harwood is a space analyst for CBS News.
William Harwood has been covering the U.S. space program full-time since 1984, first as Cape Canaveral bureau chief for United Press International and now as a consultant for CBS News. He has covered more than 115 shuttle missions, every interplanetary flight since Voyager 2's flyby of Neptune, and scores of commercial and military launches. Based at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, Harwood is a devoted amateur astronomer and co-author of "Comm Check: The Final Flight of Shuttle Columbia." You can follow his frequent status updates at the CBSNews.com Space Place, where this story was first published. 





"Beam Us Up - Scotty"!
However, A dead satellite can't be controlled to maintain an altitude like a working on can. Adjusting a working one to AVOID one will cost fuel which will end its useable life sooner. Dead sats also have a somewhat harder to predict altitude (less circular, more eliptical). Therefore it was out of its intended orbit.
This statement bothers me also: "Most, if not all, of the debris is expected to eventually burn up in Earth's atmosphere.". This expectation is unattributed, but I assume it was expressed by either Johnson or Carey. What they may have neglected to mention to the hapless author is that in cosmological terms, "eventually", might as well be forever for some of those higher altitude pieces.
The problem of space debris has been well-known for a while.
IMO, the Russian satellite was intentionally steered into the Iridium satellite of which is used solely by the Department of Defense. It seems fairly obvious to me; but, the US has so many problems right now, we don't have the time, focus or resources to deal with the issue. But you had better damn well know that the top brass in the US are very aware of what really happened.
The media could have gotten this by us in the 60's; but, we aren't nearly as naive these days. Most cognizant people know in their own head, that this is pure BS whether they ever say anything or not.
*They* knew that there was a collision about to take place.
But article says nothing about when the Iridium last maneuvered
Figure the dead soviet satellite wasn't under power and had very predicable orbit
So if the iridium was playing dead the collision would have been calculated days ahead of impact
If it moved to redistribute the iridum set . . .
and "geostationary" crowded?
one - these were both in much lower, crossing orbits with lots less 3D space and lots more space junk.
two - geostationary is so far out that it would take millions of objects to even start getting crowded - and even then they'd all be moving in the same direction and speed ('cept the dead ones which would be moving very slowly in relation to the live ones).
Almost sounds like a SG-1 story plot!!!!!!
Are you kidding that "There is no universal way of knowing what's coming in your direction".
For gods sake the yanks spend millions putting a satellite into space that cant even see where they are going, then they fire them blindly around outerspace like some headless chicken.
Its either that or it was intentional... which is it...?... either way its full of space junk up there and its like mraardvark said:
"If I was sitting in the space station, I'm not sure I'd be comforted by the declaration that the station was safe made by the same people who didn't see this coming in the first place."
"He identified the Russian spacecraft as Cosmos 2251, a communications relay station launched in June 1993, and said the satellite is believed to have been non-operational for the past 10 years or so."
If the Russian was non operational the orbit may have degraded just enough to put it in the path of the iridium satellite.
The launchers usually calculate all this stuff before they put a satellite up there, so this doesn't happen.
- by galeso February 21, 2009 4:51 PM PST
- Usually I would vote against the conspiracy theory, but this one really smells.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (35 Comments)Orbits are determined by speed, so if they were in similar orbits they should be going about the same speed. Why didn't countries agree to drive all satellites in the same direction?
Then if they hit it would just be a tap not a crash.
Yes I oversimplified but what would the odds be for a crash?