Ubuntu 9.04 as slick as Windows 7, Mac OS X
Here's what the official press release won't tell you about Ubuntu 9.04, which formally hit the streets overnight: its designers have polished the hell out of its user interface since the last release in October.
So much so, in fact, that I am starting to prefer using my Ubuntu "Jaunty Jackalope" desktop over the similarly slick Windows 7 beta (which I am currently running full-time on one desktop) and Mac OS X Leopard operating systems, which I also use regularly.
I left Windows Vista, XP, and even Debian lying bruised and battered by the roadside some time ago.
You won't be able to notice the vast improvement in Ubuntu's desktop experience over the past six months by browsing screenshot galleries of 9.04 or looking at new feature lists. What I'm talking about is that elusive slick-and-speedy feel you get from applications launching fast, windows moving around without jerkiness, and everything simply being where it should be in the user interface.
Launching and using Firefox on Ubuntu 8.10 on my 2GHz Core 2 Duo-based machine with 2GB of RAM, a 7200rpm hard disk, and an Nvidia GeForce 8800GTS always seemed to feel like I was going back a few years, to a time when Web browsers were not considered something you always had open to service Web applications like Gmail and Bloglines.
It was the same with Windows Vista.
Now, just like Microsoft has taken the blowtorch to Vista to produce the lightning-quick Windows 7, which so far runs well, even on older hardware, Ubuntu has picked up its own game.
I particularly noticed the Ubuntu difference when I put the operating system to the test by simultaneously launching and using multiple applications, listening to music and more while using my spare CPU cycles in the background to encode high-definition video with Mencoder. Ubuntu still felt very fast--even with traditionally sluggy pieces of software like OpenOffice.org.
It's not just the speed changes, however, that has got me excited about Ubuntu 9.04. It's also the subtle additions to the interface; the logical move of shutdown and reboot options to the far right of the menu; the slick new notifications system; the seamless (finally!) integration of the Nvidia accelerated drivers, and the cleaned-up options and package install systems.
Want Adobe Flash or other proprietary software like multimedia codecs on Ubuntu? Just search for them in the one location, under their own names. No downloading anything from any Web sites. No package management or dependencies. No apt-get. Point and click.
I'm not a Linux novice (in fact, I'm a former Linux and FreeBSD systems administrator), and I've been using Linux on the desktop since the late 1990s. I usually run a combination of Ubuntu and Windows on my PC, and the latest Mac OS X on my laptop.
So I'm in a position to notice step changes in user interface behavior like the one that Ubuntu has brought to the table with 9.04. In short, Ubuntu is now as slick and beautiful as Mac OS X or Windows 7.
As we've noted in earlier articles, Microsoft has also brought its best to the table with Windows 7. However, it's a pity that Apple didn't seem to do so with Leopard. Like some reviewers, I felt that Steve Jobs' latest operating-system opus added a lot of new features, but also some unfortunate erratic behavior that muddied Mac OS X's position as a user interface leader.
As the magazine Macworld has noted, the new Stacks feature in Leopard's Dock is a "mess" and replaced the formerly utilitarian approach to keeping folders in the Dock with a "snazzy but generally less useful pop-up window."
The new "Spaces" feature in Leopard is nothing new; it provides multiple virtual-desktop workspaces, which Unix has had for decades; but I found Apple's implementation erratic.
Then, too, there was the speed price some users paid in Leopard for all the upgrade, though that could just be the older-hardware penalty. On my 1.5GHz G4 laptop with 1280MB of RAM, Leopard runs sluggishly, whereas Tiger runs like a dream. As I don't use any of the new features, the upgrade seemed worthless.
When you consider Microsoft's remarkable rebirth with Windows 7 and the fact that Ubuntu is free, open source, and runs on anything, you would have to wonder what sort of rabbit Steve Jobs will have to pull out of his hat with Snow Leopard to keep growing Mac OS X's share. Sure, there are some apps missing on Linux (say, Photoshop). But the same can be said of Mac OS X in certain areas, and VMware and CrossOver solve a lot of problems.
Looking back to the genesis of Ubuntu 9.04 six months ago, I suspect that its subtle but powerful changes are due to the new user interface team that Ubuntu founder Mark Shuttleworth said at the time he would put in place. If so, that team has already earned its paychecks and even more, and we're looking forward to seeing what another six months of development will produce.
In the meantime, kudos to Ubuntu 9.04: you got game.
Renai LeMay of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.




According to El Reg,
"Acer, the world's joint second largest manufacturer of PCs, has reportedly given October 23 as the date when Microsoft's successor to Windows Vista will become available."
If that date is confirmed, it would be very nice if Canonical could announce a new Ubuntu release on the exact same day.
The reason is simple:
All the news and articles that would talk about Windows 7 will start to mention the free, open source alternative. David vs. Goliath, what a story! Ubuntu 9.10 will surf on Windows 7 waves.
What does that mean to Open Source?
http://capitao-obvio.blogspot.com/2009/05/windows-7-on-october-23-what-that-means.html
It makes me feel so good, when I work with it! It is so nice to have so good UI and UNIX core inside!
Ubuntu > OS X 10.5 = Windows 7 > Windows Xp > Windows Vista > Windows ME
Dynesh, I agree. Recently bought Vista (home premium 64) and still running XP Pro. I'll take Vista over XP. So far, it is more stable. No weird 'explorer' lockup. Better use of multi-core. yes, XP is better on weak hardware. Oh well, Vista makes better use of strong hardware. I am looking forward to '7'.
I have run Ubuntu in the past, but recently moved to OpenSuse 11.1. I may give 9.04 a shot. Previously it gave me to much trouble loading proprietary parts, like Flash. On OpenSuse, that just worked.
Take a look at websites like GNOMElook; thousands upon thousands of different themes for GNOME and others.
For all those who say GNOME is ugly, I doubt you've actually taken the time to consider the amount of changes you can make to the desktop.
With Linux, it's ENCOURAGED that everything and anything should be changed the way you want it.
My understanding is that Dell does ship ubuntu as an option on European purchased machines. However it is FREE GNU Open Source and you are free to install it on any machine you wish. The netbook remix is as implied, to adjust display composition for the various small displays on the mini/netbook laptops that are all the rage.
Great comments and well stated opinions on this thread. Kudos to all!
Think of the things MS and Apple would have to do if a free OS runs well on any system was out there and was easy for the average person to use.
Arguably they have been doing some of them. Apple is trying to make use of as much free code as possible. OS X would not be nearly where it is without free software. Microsoft has been repeatedly forced to extend the availability of XP in order to compete with Linux. The pricing of Windows is poor countries is another example.
I disagree about the value of the Leopard upgrade. The better indexing for Spotlight alone, QuickLook, Spaces, a better designed network preference pane, just to name a few of the features that I miss when I go back to Tiger for some reason. I have it running on several older machines, including a 1 GHz Titanium with 768 MB of ram Powerbook and it runs just fine. Try fixing your directory or other things on your machine because I doubt it's Leopard that is slowing it down.
Therefore, I am excitedly awaiting Mint 7 which should be a better Ubuntu a little bit better again.
I'd really like to use this wonder of Unixdom, but it doesn't work out of the box.
Ubuntu itself works great. I've installed it on two systems so far. One is a fairly easy going collection of hardware making up my "gaming" rig and the other has a fairly annoying collection of hardware consisting of a motherboard that never really worked right. Ubuntu 8.10 and 9.04 installed flawlessly with no issues on both systems.
Really there's no reason to even buy eMachines anymore. You can build your own system with virtually no hassle for as little as $250 (Intel Atom 330 on a Mini-ITX motherboard, 2GB DDR2-667, 320GB drive, DVD-burner, and a Mini-ITX case with PSU).
The WORST OS i have ever used. But Fedora is atleast decent.
I like Fedora for work use - it gives me a straightforward interface without all the toys.
I prefer Ubuntu for home use and as a newbie recommendation, since it is far and away the most user-friendly.
For servers, I prefer Fedora for the light stuff, CentOS for the heavy stuff (except Oracle, but only because Larry Ellison is a punk for not certifying Oracle to run on it, so I use RHEL in that case), and FreeBSD for the networking and edge-facing/DMZ stuff.
That brown turd has hype and not much else going for it. Ubuntu is at least 2 years behind openSUSE and doesn't have nearly as good hardware support. opensuse is the only distro I have seen that installs flawlessly on high end laptops with absolutely no configuration steps. Just install and go. The build service(which supports lots of distros) puts opensuse ahead of everyone. Especially in my line of work where many security tools are a royal pain to get working, they install easily with the build service.
My only complaint is how Novell supports the mono project, which is pointless.
Too bad trolls like you sausage can't offer anything of substance.
For most users, it will do just fine instead of Photoshop, but at the prosumer and pro level? No frickin' way GIMP would hold up entirely. I can use it to aaaaaaaaalmost replace P-Shop, but I have a metric ton of Script-Fu files that allow me to get away with it.
Don't get me wrong - I love the GIMP. OTOH, it is not a complete replacement for Photoshop.
How is the desktop app and server integration? Anyone using it? I want to load a server and WHS is $99 this is free. I'm sure Windows is easier to use and set up but the cost of this is nice.
Is it easy to set up and stream media to other devices?
Is it easy to let others see and share files from it?
I hope they got the wireless to be more stable on the latest Ubuntu.
Most likely that's the case with yours, just plug it in and let it update and you'll be find.
I'm using 9.04 now, haven't tried it with a network though. Check out the Ubuntu forums and you might have better luck finding someone to answer your questions.
Try a LiveCD. You'll be surprised just how much easier it can be to set up Linux than Windows from a fresh install when drivers come into play.
Basically, if an open source driver can be created for it, it will work right away. If it can't and you're using a distro that allows for non-free drivers (proprietary drivers) then just run an update and you should be fine. That's how it is with Ubuntu at the very least, speaking from experience.
I second the opensuse suggestion, few wireless card fail to work with no configuration. YAST is simple, and makes administration a breeze, even for the technically illiterate Windows crowd.
The interface does have the basic idea of the old Gnome interface, it's just, for lack of a better word, slicker than with 8.10.
Or, you could actually take the time to look on the site and look at the incredibly diverse theme collection GNOME look has.
I'm just not looking for a potential project. How about the developers MAKE IT WORK for the masses.
the way I see it, nothing is really free, Ubuntu is free to install, but is (usually) going to take time to setup. you have to do research, and type stuff into command line, but vista costs about $200, unless your free time is worth over $66/hr then you are still coming out ahead. this is ignoring all the advantages to a linux install, like seperate /home partitions and remastersys, less viruses (linux isn't virus or exploit free), and geek points.
That's really not the best advert for Linux that I've heard.
The choice is simple - own your own computer with an OS that isn't the M$ plantation or be a slave to Ballmer's whims. Slavery isn't offensive to everyone, some people can't handle the real world on their own and need someone to control them with a cruel whip. Some people like pain and suffering. Some people like winblows.
The rest of us support Linux in any flavor. We have our favorites (I like Ubuntu myself), but we're united in our freedom against slavery and the cruel whip of winblows genuine disadvantage.
Call people who use Windows slaves and sheep and we wonder why no ones switching.
I've seen you do the same to those not using Windows. Check your own comments before attempting to moderate those of others.
You're a brave person comparing using Windows to slavery. To be fair Jobs keeps a much more Gestapo like control over Apple and OSX than Ballmer does with Windows. I am a Linux user myself (Fedora at work, Ubuntu on my home media server), but I still have to have a Windows workstation because although people like you will always prattle on extolling the virtues of Linux, there are simply things that it cannot do. A case in point would be my render workflow. Basically: create a scene in Maya -> use the Photoshop node to allow a .psd file to contain layers for texturing, bump mapping, luminescence, etc. -> render using Mental Ray. Using Linux would take away a lot of the flexibility I have. So yes, Linux is better, but cruelly insulting those of us lesser beings who still use Windows from time to time is juvenile.
Always go with a brand that uses Atheros cards(Toshiba is one), they work out of the box, even the new n cards.
I prefer Linux, I feel it is superior, but i agree that there are times winblows is useful. For example I LOVE onenote, and have never found an acceptable FOSS alternative so i have to keep an XP virtual machine on my laptop for class
BTW, doesn't this glib use of the word "slave" just diminish and trivialize a dark period in world history?
It's marketing, marketing, marketing. That's why no year will ever be the year of Linux, no new release of a Linux distro will ever substantially change the market share of Linux. Unless ofcourse someone pays alot of money for a marketing campaign.
What 'techies' tend to forget is that OS choice isnt a religion for most people. They just want to do whatever it is they want to do on their PC. And if one OS can be configured easier than another, they're going to gravitate towards it. That little extra finishing polish that a commercial entity like MS or Apple can (and is willing to) add to their product makes a world of difference to the end user.
Main reason Linux isn't sold on anything "desirable" is because of OEMs.
Either they don't sell machines with Linux on them at all or, like some did with early netbooks, they sell a misconfigured version which gives the public a bad opinion.
@LuvThatCO2
I've been using Ubuntu for almost 4 months, the only time I type in apt-get is when I'm too lazy to do a search in the package manager. Before you start in on the package manager, which is easier, going to one place to search for pretty much everything or having to do a google search each and every time you want a new app then doing another google search to make sure it's not malware and then installing it and hoping it works?
MS and Apple have been working on looks almost exclusively. Apple uses a pretty decent amount of open source tech under the hood so they've gotten by quite nicely. Windows works ok mainly because of third parties.
Linux, on the other hand, has been worked on under the hood first. Just about everything works the way it should each and every time and is much easier to install and use than Windows and it has almost all the benefits of OS X (no benefit from a locked down marriage of hardware and software). Now that the engine is right at completion, it's time to work on the rest.
I'm not sure about you but I'd rather have something that runs well but needs a paint-job than something that looks pretty and won't start up or breaks down constantly.
It is not marketing, but preinstallation. The dominance of Windows on "IBM compatible" computers exists primarily because such computers are sold with Windows preinstalled; Microsoft has bullied computer sellers to ensure this, threatening to not allow Windows on any of the seller's computers if any other OS is preinstalled on any of their machines available for purchase. The dominance of Mac OS on Apple computers is again because such computers are sold with Mac OS preinstalled. Linux's best shot at a similar strategy would be if IBM ever follows through with their idea of selling computers with Ubuntu, SUSE, and RedHat.
The 90's called they want their FUD back.
I believe this is completely wrong.
Proof: Mozilla Firefox.
Every time someone asks me for help with Internet Explorer, I ask "Why are you still using that [expletive deleted]?" And I immediately upgrade them to a real browser.
I keep hoping and praying for the day when Linux FINALLY has its act together as well as Firefox does, where I can UNEQUIVOCALLY recommend it.
If you cannot win ME over (and I do want it), the hundred or so people who depend on my recommendation will never use it.
Proof: Vista.
I had a Toshiba which would connect to my wireless under Linux but not under Vista which it came installed with. Apparently according to the supplier I bought it from the Vista wireless problem was a known issue with no known fix.
So In my case Ubuntu worked were Vista just didn't
The REMIX works great on Netbooks and is available for download from the ubuntu site.
As far as Stacks, once Apple added the ability to change the icon back to a folder instead of a pile of crap and allowed you to set a preference for whether you wanted a list, stack or grid, it worked great. Personally, I hated the single stack view, but found the other choices extremely useful; Grid view for smaller folders, list view for packed folders (like my Applications). A "mess"? Only if you choose to be messy.
Granted, I am looking to see some serious performance and stability improvements next time around. It certainly doesn't need any new features. In fact, no modern OS needs any new features, unless that feature is going to be a revolutionary paradigm in human-computer interaction, much the same as the GUI was over CLI based OSes.
I'll probably throw Jaunty on one of my older computers to see if Ubuntu has come along far enough that I'd consider using it on one of my secondary machines, or perhaps a netbook, since I'm eyeballing an HP Mini just for the purpose of surfing the net on the couch. I really want to put it on one of my PPC's.
I'm ambivalent towards Stacks. Yes, it certainly looks pretty but I don't think it adds very much and the Stacks tend to be pretty slow if you have a lot of items in the folder. For folders with small collections it works pretty well and the Quick Look previews certainly help.
- by sammy-n April 24, 2009 8:42 AM PDT
- Screenshots here http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu/904features/ look exactly identical to 8 after the login screen. So, are you saying that "as slick as" means "as fast as" or is it actually more attractive, sleek, sexy?
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Dango517 April 24, 2009 12:01 PM PDT
- Yep, your right! Slick new appearance, my eye.
-
-
- by pithenumber April 24, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
- @Dango517
-
-
- by tm_anon April 24, 2009 3:32 PM PDT
- @sammy-n
-
-
- by ithomas94 June 21, 2009 9:22 PM PDT
- @Dango17 and sammy-n: Obviously, you miss the point of Linux if you judge it based on the default theme.
-
-
Showing 1 of 5 pages (205 Comments)Faster it should be it can only run a tenth the applications Windows can. Of course dyed in the wool Penguins refer to that as blot. Geez, it must scream with the 2GBs Vista has pushed the net to upgrade to. :)
1. Dango tastes good, I like the Teriyaki variation :)
2. WINE remind you of anything? You can even use WINE to run Windows applications, even some games.
Screenshots don't really give it justice. I upgraded prior to release thinking it was just going to have a few updated pieces of software in the background, it really is much more attractive. Though it also tends to be a bit faster than 8.10 on my old hardware and Ubuntu 8.10 was quite a bit faster than Windows XP on this same hardware.
@Dango517
Seeing as you're so dead-set against Linux, judging from your comment, why should anyone listen to what you have to say? Especially when you're making that comment underneath an article with Linux as the topic.
By the way, the 2GB forced upgrade for RAM wasn't for the net, it was for PCs which have to be bought by consumers. If they can get away with 1GB and still have just as good if not better performance with a free OS that does everything 99% of people need a computer for, it doesn't say anything good about Vista.
Of course, with 2GB RAM, my much more streamlined choice of OS will do everything Vista does, except of course, it will do it that much faster.
www.gnome-look.org has a great selection of tons of themes.
Can Mac OS X or Windows change almost every aspect of their GUI's?
In fact, do some ACTUAL research and refrain from clicking on the first link Google provides.