Third Chrome beta another notch faster
On the SunSpider JavaScript peformance test, the new Google Chrome beta edges closer to TraceMonkey-enhanced Firefox. But the cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox edges ahead, too.
(Credit: CNET News)Google began updating Chrome users with the new beta version, and my performance tests show the company has ratcheted the browser's speed up another notch.
Google Chrome's latest version, 0.3.154.9, shows a 37 percent JavaScript performance improvement over the initial beta released two months ago.
JavaScript is a programming language used to add some pizazz to innumerable Web pages, but more importantly from Google's perspective, to power sophisticated Web applications such as Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Gmail. JavaScript is also up against Adobe Systems' Flash and Flex, Microsoft's Silverlight, and HTML 5, in the competition for what's the best foundation for Web applications.
Google has begun automatically updating all Chrome users to the new 0.3.154.9 beta version.
(Credit: CNET News)Using Google's JavaScript benchmark I pitted the newest Chrome beta, version 0.3.154.9, against both the initial beta from September and the more raw 0.3.154.3 developer release from mid-October. A higher number is better on this test, and the first beta scored 1,851, the 0.3.154.3 developer release 2,265, and the new 0.3.154.9 beta 2,546.
Google's tests aren't the only game in town; many use the SunSpider test. Here, too, the new Chrome got a notch faster, getting the test done in 2,546 milliseconds compared with 2,904 milliseconds for 0.3.154.3. (We couldn't test the first version because the testing site was down at the time.)
The new Chrome score catches closer to the 2,250 millisecond score of Firefox 3.1 beta 1 with its new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. (Tech-Recipes has useful instructions on how to enable TraceMonkey.)
On blogger Matt Asay's advice, I tested Minefield, the cutting-edge version of Firefox that's updated daily. (Minefield is downloadable from Mozilla's FTP site for those willing to use very untested software).
It had the best SunSpider score so far on my machine, 2,147 milliseconds. However, Firefox still lags on Google's speed test. Chrome's latest score of 2,546 is miles ahead of the 215 score from Minefield.
The latest beta version of Google Chrome is a notch faster on Google's JavaScript speed tests, where a larger number is better. The cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox takes a step back from the the 3.1 beta 1 of Firefox, without the new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. All the Firefox versions trail Chrome on this test significantly.
(Credit: CNET News)There could be something fishy going on here, though: Minefield, which has TraceMonkey turned on, actually is slower than Firefox 3.1 beta 1 with TraceMonkey turned off, which is hardly the result you'd expect for a JavaScript speed test. TraceMonkey-enabled Firefox 3.1 beta 1 couldn't run the test because of a bug, and though that bug was fixed in Minefield, there could be something else awry.
And again with the caveats: These tests were run on a dual-core Windows XP machine, and your mileage will undoubtedly vary. They're synthetic benchmarks that may not accurately represent all the particular JavaScript you have to run. And JavaScript isn't the sole measure of a browser's speed.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 





See http://webkit.org
regards
Mark Buckley
:)
Oh yea... like the naked eye can really see the difference..?!?!
Google Chrome 0.3.154.9---
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 1584.8ms +/- 5.4%
--------------------------------------------
Minefield---
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 1918.2ms +/- 4.8%
--------------------------------------------
Test Environment:
Intel T7500 2.2 G CPU.
3GB RAM
Windows Vista SP1
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 1764.4ms +/- 1.2%
--------------------------------------------
MacBook (early-2008) 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, OS X 10.5.5
Then I'll be back, google, don't you worry.
Was there something you could have done to not get that unwanted installation; other than pay attention to the warnings? Is it CHROME or did you simply just ignore the warning? I'm thinking of installing this browser to see how it works on Vista. I love FIrefox but if this is faster....then I want it!
.....or, quit pirating from untrusty blogs
- by Linearly November 5, 2008 7:38 PM PST
- SunSpider Results using Chromium 0.3.155.0 Build 4705
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Linearly November 5, 2008 8:06 PM PST
- I was bored, so decided to run a few more tests, and i think something is wrong (10points if you can guess where they might be)
- Like this
-
(26 Comments)============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 990.4ms +/- 2.4%
--------------------------------------------
(link to results @ http://tinyurl.com/sunspider-chromeresult )
Core 2 e6600 @ 2.8GHz
4GB DDR2
Windows XP x64 Professional SP2
Unless i did something wrong, thats a rather fast run of SunSpider compared to other results ... i ran it a few more times and it was comparable in speed to that one
SunSpider Results using Chromium 0.3.155.0 Build 4705
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 963.2ms +/- 1.6%
--------------------------------------------
SunSpider Results using Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 22461.2ms +/- 0.5%
--------------------------------------------
SunSpider Results using Opera 9.62 Build 10467
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 3216.2ms +/- 1.0%
--------------------------------------------
SunSpider Results using FireFox 3.0.3
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2516.4ms +/- 0.9%
--------------------------------------------
SunSpider Results using Safari 3.1.2 Build 525.21
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 3010.0ms +/- 1.1%
--------------------------------------------